HUD awards $12.4M contract to Leidos Aspen Systems Corp for community connections program

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,422,489 ($12.4M)

Contractor: Leidos Aspen Systems Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development

Start Date: 2000-12-27

End Date: 2004-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,465 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.5K/day

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: AWARD OF PERFORMANCE BASED TASK ORDER #3 FOR COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20410

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $12.4 million to LEIDOS ASPEN SYSTEMS CORP for work described as: AWARD OF PERFORMANCE BASED TASK ORDER #3 FOR COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for community connections program, indicating a focus on social services or infrastructure. 2. Performance-based task order suggests a focus on measurable outcomes and service delivery. 3. The contract duration of approximately 4 years allows for sustained program support. 4. Awarded by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, aligning with its mission. 5. The contractor, Leidos Aspen Systems Corp, has experience in government contracting. 6. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can incentivize cost control but requires careful oversight.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award amount of $12.4 million for a 4-year community connections program appears to be within a reasonable range for such services, though specific benchmarks are difficult to ascertain without more detail on the program's scope. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure necessitates close monitoring to ensure value for money, as it allows for cost reimbursement plus a predetermined profit. Without comparative data on similar community connection initiatives or detailed cost breakdowns, a definitive value assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The competition level for this task order is not specified in the provided data. Task orders under larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts can vary widely in their competitive nature. If this was competed under a broad IDIQ, it may have had several bidders. However, if it was a specific task order with limited scope or specialized requirements, the competition might have been more restricted. The lack of detail prevents an assessment of how effectively price discovery was achieved.

Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition directly impacts taxpayer value. Robust competition typically drives down prices and encourages innovation, leading to better use of public funds. Limited competition can result in higher costs and potentially less optimal solutions.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely individuals and communities served by the 'Community Connections' program, which could encompass a range of social services, outreach, or support initiatives. The services delivered are aimed at fostering connections within communities, potentially addressing social isolation, improving access to resources, or enhancing community engagement. The geographic impact is centered in the District of Columbia, as indicated by the 'ST' and 'SN' fields. Workforce implications could include employment opportunities for program staff, community outreach workers, and administrative personnel managed by the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts require diligent oversight to prevent cost overruns and ensure the fixed fee remains appropriate.
The specific nature of 'Community Connections' is vague, making it difficult to assess performance metrics and potential risks without further clarification.
Limited information on competition makes it hard to gauge if the government secured the best possible price and service.

Positive Signals

Awarding a performance-based task order suggests a focus on achieving defined outcomes.
The contract duration of over three years allows for continuity of services and program development.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development's involvement indicates alignment with established federal social service goals.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broad category of government services, likely related to social programs or community development. The market for such services involves numerous non-profit organizations and government contractors specializing in program management, outreach, and social support. Benchmarking spending in this specific niche is challenging without a clearer definition of 'Community Connections,' but it represents a segment of federal spending dedicated to improving social welfare and community infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate whether this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements. Without this information, it is impossible to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem or the extent to which small businesses will participate in fulfilling this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). As a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract, HUD's contracting officers and program managers would be responsible for monitoring costs, ensuring adherence to the fixed fee, verifying performance against task order requirements, and ensuring compliance with all federal acquisition regulations. Transparency would depend on HUD's reporting practices and the public availability of contract performance data.

Related Government Programs

Community Development Block Grants
Housing Choice Vouchers Program
Homeless Assistance Programs
Social Services Block Grants

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires robust oversight.
Lack of specific service details hinders performance assessment.
Competition level is unknown, impacting price discovery analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $12.4 million to LEIDOS ASPEN SYSTEMS CORP. AWARD OF PERFORMANCE BASED TASK ORDER #3 FOR COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEIDOS ASPEN SYSTEMS CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-12-27. End: 2004-12-31.

What specific services are encompassed by the 'Community Connections' program?

The provided data offers only the title 'Community Connections' and does not detail the specific services rendered. Typically, such programs managed by HUD could involve a wide array of activities, including but not limited to, outreach to underserved populations, facilitating access to housing resources, providing case management, coordinating social services, promoting community engagement initiatives, or supporting local infrastructure projects that enhance community well-being. A precise understanding of the services is crucial for evaluating the contract's effectiveness and value.

How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure compare to other contract types for similar services?

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure reimburses the contractor for allowable costs incurred, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. This structure is often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined or is expected to evolve. Compared to Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contracts, CPFF offers less cost certainty for the government but can be advantageous when innovation or flexibility is paramount. Compared to Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), CPFF provides a fixed profit regardless of performance variations, whereas CPIF can adjust profit based on meeting specific performance targets. For services like community outreach, where outcomes might be less predictable than manufacturing, CPFF can provide necessary flexibility, but it demands rigorous oversight to control costs.

What is the historical spending pattern for 'Community Connections' programs at HUD?

The provided data pertains to a single award of $12.4 million for a task order ending in 2004. To understand historical spending patterns for 'Community Connections' programs at HUD, one would need to analyze contract databases for similar awards over multiple fiscal years. This would involve searching for contracts with related keywords, program names, or objectives managed by HUD. Without access to a comprehensive database and specific search parameters, it is impossible to establish a trend or benchmark for this particular program's historical funding.

What is Leidos Aspen Systems Corp's track record with HUD and similar community-focused contracts?

The data identifies 'LEIDOS ASPEN SYSTEMS CORP' as the contractor. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their past performance on contracts with HUD and other federal agencies, particularly those involving community programs or social services. This would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, any documented issues or successes, and the types and values of previous contracts they have held. Leidos is a large government contractor, and Aspen Systems was acquired by Leidos, suggesting a significant operational capacity. However, specific performance details for this 'Community Connections' contract or similar endeavors would require further investigation into federal procurement records.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being measured?

As this is a 'Performance Based Task Order,' it implies that specific performance metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) should be defined within the contract's statement of work. However, these KPIs are not detailed in the provided summary data. Typically, for a 'Community Connections' program, KPIs might include metrics related to the number of individuals or families served, the types of services provided, client satisfaction rates, successful referrals to other resources, or community engagement levels. The effectiveness of performance measurement hinges on the clarity and measurability of these defined KPIs and the rigor of the government's monitoring process.

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)

Address: 2277 RESEARCH BLVD, ROCKVILLE, MD, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,422,489

Exercised Options: $12,422,489

Current Obligation: $12,422,489

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: COPC21191

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline