HUD awards $54.7M contract to FIRST PRESTON MANAGEMENT, INC. for unspecified services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $54,727,502 ($54.7M)

Contractor: First Preston Management, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development

Start Date: 2000-01-15

End Date: 2004-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,477 days

Daily Burn Rate: $37.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 51

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: ADDISON, DALLAS County, TEXAS, 75001

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $54.7 million to FIRST PRESTON MANAGEMENT, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $54.7M over 4 years. 2. Awarded via full and open competition. 3. No specific service details provided, limiting risk assessment. 4. Sector context is unclear due to lack of service description.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Without knowing the services provided, it's impossible to assess if the pricing is competitive or represents good value. The benchmark is not applicable.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. However, the lack of service details makes it difficult to confirm if the competition effectively drove down costs for the specific needs.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized, but the specific impact on taxpayers cannot be determined without understanding the services rendered and their necessity.

Public Impact

Lack of transparency regarding the services procured raises concerns about accountability. Potential for funds to be used for non-essential or poorly defined services. Citizens cannot ascertain the direct benefit or purpose of this significant expenditure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The sector for this contract is not specified, making it difficult to provide context or compare spending benchmarks. The nature of the services is crucial for sector classification.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not a factor in this award, as the 'sb' field is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses could have provided these services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is challenging due to the absence of clear service descriptions. HUD's internal controls and post-award monitoring would be critical to ensure funds are used appropriately.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-housing-and-urban-developm, tx, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $54.7 million to FIRST PRESTON MANAGEMENT, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FIRST PRESTON MANAGEMENT, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $54.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-01-15. End: 2004-01-31.

What specific services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with HUD's mission?

The provided data does not specify the services procured. This lack of detail prevents an assessment of their alignment with HUD's mission to create strong, sustainable, inclusive communities. Understanding the services is paramount to evaluating the contract's value and effectiveness.

What risks are associated with awarding a $54.7M contract without clearly defined services?

The primary risk is the potential for misuse of funds, lack of accountability, and failure to achieve intended outcomes. Without defined services, it's difficult to measure performance, ensure quality, or verify that the contract meets a genuine need, leading to potential waste.

How can the effectiveness of this contract be measured given the lack of service details?

Measuring effectiveness is severely hampered without knowing the services. Typically, effectiveness is gauged against predefined objectives and performance metrics tied to the services. In this case, without that information, effectiveness can only be broadly assessed by whether the funds were spent without apparent fraud.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 51

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 5040 ADDISON CIR, ADDISON, TX, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $87,821,344

Exercised Options: $87,821,344

Current Obligation: $54,727,502

Timeline

Start Date: 2000-01-15

Current End Date: 2004-01-31

Potential End Date: 2004-01-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-04-01

More Contracts from First Preston Management, Inc.

View all First Preston Management, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Housing and Urban Development Contracts

View all Department of Housing and Urban Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending