Transportation contract for landfill work awarded to Bristol Construction Services LLC for over $15.1 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,154,466 ($15.2M)

Contractor: Bristol Construction Services LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2007-03-19

End Date: 2008-04-10

Contract Duration: 388 days

Daily Burn Rate: $39.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: REMOVAL OF EXISTING LANDFILL MATERIAL AND SAMPLING AT LANDFILL NUMBER 1 AT CAPE YAKATAGA.

Place of Performance

Location: MARYSVILLE, SNOHOMISH County, WASHINGTON, 98270

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $15.2 million to BRISTOL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC for work described as: REMOVAL OF EXISTING LANDFILL MATERIAL AND SAMPLING AT LANDFILL NUMBER 1 AT CAPE YAKATAGA. Key points: 1. The contract value of $15.1 million for landfill material removal and sampling appears substantial for the specified duration. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. The contract was awarded in 2007, providing historical context for current spending. 5. The project falls under the Federal Aviation Administration's purview, related to airport infrastructure. 6. The contractor, Bristol Construction Services LLC, has secured this significant award.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $15.1 million for landfill material removal and sampling at Cape Yakataga is a significant investment. Without specific benchmarks for similar landfill remediation projects in remote Alaskan locations, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the duration of the contract (388 days) and the scope of work (material removal and sampling) suggest a considerable undertaking. The fixed-price nature of the contract aims to control costs, but the overall cost-effectiveness hinges on the efficiency of the contractor and the unforeseen complexities of the site.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited and considered. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a degree of competition, which is generally favorable for price discovery and achieving a reasonable market price. This competitive environment should have allowed the FAA to select the most advantageous offer based on price and other factors.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and ensures that the government is not overpaying due to a lack of alternatives.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration, ensuring compliance and safety at Cape Yakataga's landfill. The services delivered include the critical tasks of removing existing landfill material and conducting necessary sampling. The geographic impact is localized to Cape Yakataga, Alaska, addressing specific environmental and operational needs at the landfill. Workforce implications would involve employment opportunities for construction and environmental sampling personnel during the contract period.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen environmental conditions are encountered at the landfill.
Logistical challenges in a remote location like Cape Yakataga could impact project timelines and costs.
Ensuring the quality and accuracy of sampling data is crucial for environmental compliance.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Fixed-price contract type helps to establish cost certainty for the government.
The contract addresses a specific environmental and operational need for the FAA.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader construction and environmental services sector, specifically related to infrastructure development and maintenance. The Federal Aviation Administration often engages in projects to ensure the safety and operational integrity of airports and surrounding areas. While specific market size data for landfill remediation in remote Alaskan regions is scarce, such projects are critical for environmental compliance and land use management. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within federal and state environmental protection agency contracts for similar remediation efforts.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. The award went to Bristol Construction Services LLC, and the number of bidders (3) does not provide insight into small business participation. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if there were specific outreach efforts made.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards, reporting requirements, and payment schedules tied to milestones. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed project execution reports may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Aviation Administration Airport Improvement Program
Environmental Remediation Contracts
Department of Transportation Infrastructure Projects
Landfill Management and Closure Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to remote location logistics.
Environmental risks associated with landfill material.
Contract performance monitoring in a remote setting.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $15.2 million to BRISTOL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC. REMOVAL OF EXISTING LANDFILL MATERIAL AND SAMPLING AT LANDFILL NUMBER 1 AT CAPE YAKATAGA.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BRISTOL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-03-19. End: 2008-04-10.

What is the track record of Bristol Construction Services LLC with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Transportation or FAA?

A review of federal contract databases would be necessary to fully assess Bristol Construction Services LLC's track record. However, this specific award of over $15.1 million from the FAA in 2007 indicates they were capable of handling significant federal projects at that time. Further analysis would involve examining the number of contracts awarded, their values, performance ratings (if available), and any history of disputes or contract terminations. Understanding their past performance, especially on similar environmental or construction projects, would provide context for the success and efficiency of this particular landfill remediation effort.

How does the $15.1 million contract value compare to similar landfill remediation projects in remote or challenging environments?

Benchmarking this $15.1 million contract value against similar projects is challenging without specific comparative data for landfill remediation in remote Alaskan locations. Factors such as remoteness, environmental conditions, accessibility, and the specific scope of work (material type, volume, sampling complexity) significantly influence costs. Generally, projects in remote areas incur higher logistical costs for labor, equipment, and materials. While $15.1 million is a substantial sum, it may be within a reasonable range for a project of this nature in such a location, assuming the scope was comprehensive and addressed significant environmental concerns. A detailed cost breakdown and comparison with projects of similar scale and complexity in comparable environments would be needed for a definitive assessment.

What were the key performance indicators and milestones for this contract, and were they met?

The specific key performance indicators (KPIs) and milestones for this contract are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, for a landfill remediation project, KPIs would include metrics related to the volume of material removed, the timeline for completion of specific phases (e.g., excavation, sampling, backfilling), adherence to environmental safety protocols, and the quality of sampling and analysis. Milestones would likely be tied to the completion of these phases. Without access to the contract's statement of work and performance reports, it's impossible to definitively state whether all KPIs and milestones were met. However, the contract's completion date (April 10, 2008) suggests it was brought to a conclusion within its scheduled timeframe.

What were the primary risks identified for this project, and how were they mitigated?

The primary risks for a landfill remediation project in a remote location like Cape Yakataga would likely include environmental hazards (e.g., hazardous materials, soil contamination), logistical challenges (transportation, weather delays, limited resources), potential for unforeseen site conditions, and contractor performance issues. Mitigation strategies would typically involve thorough site assessments prior to award, detailed environmental and safety plans, contingency planning for logistical disruptions, robust contract management and oversight by the FAA, and potentially performance bonds from the contractor. The fixed-price contract structure also shifts some financial risk to the contractor. Specific risk mitigation plans for this contract would be detailed in the project documentation.

How has federal spending on landfill remediation and related environmental services evolved since this contract was awarded in 2007?

Federal spending on landfill remediation and environmental services has likely seen fluctuations and potential increases since 2007, driven by evolving environmental regulations, increased awareness of environmental protection, and infrastructure needs. Agencies like the EPA and DOT, along with others, manage numerous contracts for site cleanup, hazardous waste management, and environmental monitoring. Factors such as technological advancements in remediation techniques, changes in funding priorities, and the overall economic climate influence spending patterns. While this specific contract represents a snapshot from 2007, broader trends indicate a continued and significant federal investment in environmental compliance and remediation across various sectors.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Utility System Construction › Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 4TH ST STE D, MARYSVILLE, WA, 01

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $56,200,973

Exercised Options: $15,154,466

Current Obligation: $15,154,466

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DTFAAL05D00003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline