DoD awards $12.8M construction contract to Bristol Construction Services, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,819,031 ($12.8M)
Contractor: Bristol Construction Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-06-30
End Date: 2010-11-05
Contract Duration: 858 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: TEMF, MEDIUM
Place of Performance
Location: TACOMA, PIERCE County, WASHINGTON, 98433
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $12.8 million to BRISTOL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC for work described as: TEMF, MEDIUM Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. 2. Full and open competition was utilized after exclusion of sources. 3. The contract duration was 858 days. 4. The award value was $12,819,031.08.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $12.8M is within a reasonable range for commercial and institutional building construction projects of this scale. Benchmarking against similar projects would provide a more precise assessment of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process. However, the exclusion of sources warrants further investigation to ensure maximum price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests a reasonable effort to secure fair pricing for taxpayers, though the exclusion of sources could have limited the ultimate cost savings.
Public Impact
Supports infrastructure development within the Department of the Army. Provides construction services potentially impacting local economies where work is performed. Ensures facilities are available for military operations and personnel.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Exclusion of sources in a full and open competition process needs justification.
- Lack of small business participation noted.
Positive Signals
- Contract awarded through a competitive process.
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector is driven by infrastructure needs across government agencies. Benchmarks vary widely based on project scope and location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business. There is no specific information provided on efforts to subcontract with small businesses, which is a missed opportunity for broader economic impact.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms. The 'AW' (Awarding Agency) and 'SA' (Servicing Agency) fields suggest internal tracking.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
- No small business participation indicated.
- Contract duration is substantial, increasing risk of unforeseen issues.
- Lack of detailed bid information hinders full value assessment.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, wa, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $12.8 million to BRISTOL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC. TEMF, MEDIUM
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BRISTOL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-06-30. End: 2010-11-05.
What was the specific justification for excluding certain sources in this full and open competition?
The justification for excluding sources in a full and open competition is crucial for understanding the procurement strategy. Without this information, it's difficult to assess if the exclusion was necessary and if it potentially limited competition or led to suboptimal pricing. Further review of the solicitation documents and award justification would be required.
What was the total value of bids received, and how did Bristol Construction Services' bid compare?
Knowing the total value of bids received and how Bristol Construction Services' bid compared is essential for a thorough value assessment. This information helps determine the competitiveness of the bidding process and whether the awarded price represents a good deal for the government. The provided data only shows the awarded amount, not the full bid landscape.
Were there any performance issues or contract modifications during the contract period?
Information on performance issues or contract modifications is vital for assessing the effectiveness and overall success of the contract. Significant modifications or repeated performance problems could indicate underlying issues with the initial contract terms, the contractor's capabilities, or the project management. This data is not available in the provided snippet.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912HN07R0097
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Bristol BAY Native Corporation (UEI: 060036357)
Address: 111 W 16 AVE 3RD FL, ANCHORAGE, AK, 00
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,591,648
Exercised Options: $12,819,031
Current Obligation: $12,819,031
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912HN08D0027
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-06-30
Current End Date: 2010-11-05
Potential End Date: 2010-11-05 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-12-07
More Contracts from Bristol Construction Services, LLC
- Repair Rail Line AT Motsu — $54.8M (Department of Defense)
- ; E: NYC, NY; Brooklyn Bridge Hazard Mitigation — $43.8M (Department of Defense)
- Removal of Existing Landfill Material and Sampling AT Landfill Number 1 AT Cape Yakataga — $15.2M (Department of Transportation)
- Company Operations Facilitiy Matoc — $14.0M (Department of Defense)
View all Bristol Construction Services, LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)