DOJ's $10.8M IT contract to Leidos Aspen Systems Corp. for facilities management services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,793,383 ($10.8M)

Contractor: Leidos Aspen Systems Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2007-08-10

End Date: 2009-08-31

Contract Duration: 752 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.4K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: NCJRS 2008 CORE / LOT 1

Place of Performance

Location: ROCKVILLE, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20850

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $10.8 million to LEIDOS ASPEN SYSTEMS CORP for work described as: NCJRS 2008 CORE / LOT 1 Key points: 1. Contract awarded for computer facilities management, indicating a need for specialized IT infrastructure support. 2. The delivery order was competitively sourced, suggesting a degree of market price discovery. 3. A 2-year duration suggests a need for ongoing, but not necessarily long-term, facility management. 4. The contract's value falls within a moderate range for IT services of this nature. 5. Performance is located in Maryland, potentially impacting local IT workforce and service providers.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $10.8 million over two years for IT facilities management services appears within a reasonable range for a government contract of this scope. Benchmarking against similar contracts for computer facilities management services would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Without specific per-unit cost data or comparison to market rates for similar services, a definitive assessment of pricing efficiency is challenging. However, the competitive nature of the award suggests that pricing was scrutinized against market alternatives.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of 4 bidders suggests a reasonable level of competition for this requirement. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives offers from various market participants, potentially driving down costs and improving service quality.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely resulted in a more favorable price compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario. It ensures that public funds are used efficiently by leveraging market forces to obtain the best value.

Public Impact

The Department of Justice benefits from the provision of essential IT facilities management services, ensuring operational continuity. The contract supports the maintenance and operation of critical computer infrastructure within the Office of Justice Programs. Services are delivered within Maryland, potentially creating or sustaining local IT jobs. The contract ensures the availability of reliable IT services for DOJ operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs without adequate oversight.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical IT facilities management could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Competitive award process suggests a focus on achieving value for money.
Defined delivery order period limits long-term financial commitment and allows for reassessment.
The contractor, Leidos Aspen Systems Corp., likely has experience in government contracting.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically focusing on IT facilities management. This sub-sector involves the maintenance, operation, and support of data centers, server rooms, and related IT infrastructure. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous providers ranging from large system integrators to specialized IT support firms. Government spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need to maintain secure and efficient IT operations across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate if this contract included small business set-asides or subcontracting goals. As a competitive delivery order, it's possible that small businesses could have participated as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement and its impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Office of Justice Programs within the Department of Justice. Accountability measures would include performance monitoring, adherence to contract terms, and delivery of services as specified. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases and reporting requirements, though specific oversight details are not provided in the data.

Related Government Programs

IT Services
Computer Facilities Management
Department of Justice IT Contracts
Office of Justice Programs IT Spending

Risk Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.
Reliance on contractor for critical IT infrastructure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $10.8 million to LEIDOS ASPEN SYSTEMS CORP. NCJRS 2008 CORE / LOT 1

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEIDOS ASPEN SYSTEMS CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Office of Justice Programs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-08-10. End: 2009-08-31.

What is the track record of Leidos Aspen Systems Corp. with the Department of Justice and similar federal agencies?

Leidos Aspen Systems Corp. has a history of performing contracts with the Department of Justice and other federal agencies. Their experience often spans various IT services, including facilities management, network support, and system integration. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, including any past performance evaluations or awards, would provide insight into their reliability and capability. A review of their contract history can reveal patterns in contract types, values, and durations, helping to assess their suitability for this specific delivery order and identify any potential performance risks or strengths.

How does the $10.8 million contract value compare to industry benchmarks for similar IT facilities management services?

The $10.8 million contract value for two years of IT facilities management services needs to be benchmarked against industry standards and comparable government contracts. Factors such as the scope of services (e.g., number of facilities, types of equipment managed, level of support), geographic location, and specific technical requirements significantly influence pricing. Without detailed service level agreements and a breakdown of costs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, general market data for IT infrastructure management suggests that this value is within a moderate range for a federal agency of the Department of Justice's size, assuming standard service levels.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Primary risks for this IT facilities management contract include potential service disruptions due to contractor performance issues, cybersecurity vulnerabilities within the managed facilities, and cost overruns from scope creep or unforeseen technical challenges. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust performance monitoring by the contracting officer's representative (COR), adherence to strict security protocols, clear definition of contract scope, and contingency planning. The competitive nature of the award may also mitigate some risks by selecting a vendor with a proven track record. However, ongoing vigilance and proactive management are crucial throughout the contract's lifecycle.

How effective has the Office of Justice Programs been in managing its IT facilities management contracts historically?

Assessing the historical effectiveness of the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) in managing IT facilities management contracts requires a review of their procurement processes, contract performance metrics, and any reported issues or successes. Factors to consider include the timeliness of contract awards, the quality of services delivered, the ability to control costs, and the level of competition achieved in their solicitations. Examining past OJP Inspector General reports or GAO reviews related to IT services could provide specific insights into their management practices and identify areas for improvement in contract oversight and performance.

What has been the historical spending trend for IT facilities management services by the Department of Justice?

Historical spending trends for IT facilities management services by the Department of Justice (DOJ) can be analyzed by examining procurement data over several fiscal years. This analysis would reveal the total amount spent on such services, the primary contractors utilized, and the types of contract vehicles employed (e.g., delivery orders, task orders, prime contracts). Understanding these trends helps in identifying patterns of increasing or decreasing investment, potential consolidation of services, and the overall reliance on external support for IT infrastructure. Such data can inform future budgeting and strategic sourcing decisions for the DOJ.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Facilities Management Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)

Address: 2277 RESEARCH BLVD, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20850

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,800,177

Exercised Options: $10,800,177

Current Obligation: $10,793,383

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJO2004C007

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline