DOJ's ATF Spends $37.2M on Computing Infrastructure, Awarded via Non-Competitive SAP
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $37,218,293 ($37.2M)
Contractor: Rolling BAY, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Justice
Start Date: 2015-01-01
End Date: 2016-06-30
Contract Duration: 546 days
Daily Burn Rate: $68.2K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF FOR CRITICAL FUNCTIONS
Place of Performance
Location: MARTINSBURG, BERKELEY County, WEST VIRGINIA, 25401
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Justice obligated $37.2 million to ROLLING BAY, LLC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF FOR CRITICAL FUNCTIONS Key points: 1. Significant spending on essential computing services. 2. Lack of competition raises concerns about price discovery. 3. Potential for better value through competitive bidding. 4. IT sector spending, but specific service details are limited.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $37.2 million for a 1.5-year period is substantial. Without competitive benchmarks, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty but may not reflect market efficiencies.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
This contract was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a potential limitation in the competitive process. The award method as a delivery order suggests it might be part of a larger, potentially non-competitive, framework.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of robust competition may result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for these critical computing services.
Public Impact
Ensures critical functions of the ATF are supported by necessary computing infrastructure. The award method raises questions about the government's ability to secure the best value. Transparency in the procurement process could be improved to foster greater public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition
- Potential for overpayment
- Lack of transparency in award
Positive Signals
- Supports critical government functions
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT sector, specifically for computing infrastructure and hosting services. Spending in this area is crucial for government operations, but competitive procurement is vital to ensure cost-effectiveness.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed.
Oversight & Accountability
The award method, not competed under SAP, warrants further review to ensure adherence to procurement regulations and to confirm that the government obtained fair and reasonable pricing.
Related Government Programs
- Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services
- Department of Justice Contracting
- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for inflated pricing
- Limited transparency in award justification
- No clear indication of small business participation
Tags
computing-infrastructure-providers-data-, department-of-justice, wv, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Justice awarded $37.2 million to ROLLING BAY, LLC. IGF::CT::IGF FOR CRITICAL FUNCTIONS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ROLLING BAY, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Acquisition and Property Management Division).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $37.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2015-01-01. End: 2016-06-30.
What specific computing services were provided under this contract, and how do they align with the agency's needs?
The contract covers 'Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services.' While broad, the specific deliverables and performance metrics are not detailed in the provided data. Understanding the precise nature of these services is crucial for assessing their necessity and value to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives' critical functions.
What was the justification for not competing this contract under SAP, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?
The data states 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP,' implying a deviation from standard competitive procedures for acquisitions below the simplified threshold. The specific justification for this decision, such as urgency, unique capabilities, or sole-source justification, is not provided. Without this information, it's impossible to assess if the non-competitive approach was warranted or if it limited potential cost savings.
How does the $37.2 million expenditure compare to industry benchmarks for similar computing infrastructure and hosting services?
A direct comparison to industry benchmarks is challenging without more granular details on the services rendered, service level agreements, and the specific technologies employed. However, for a 1.5-year contract, $37.2 million represents a significant investment. A thorough market research and cost analysis would be required to determine if this price is competitive and represents good value for the taxpayer.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Information › Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services › Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: OLD Harbor Native Corporation (UEI: 187615534)
Address: 10440 BALLS FORD RD STE 200, MANASSAS, VA, 20109
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $37,218,293
Exercised Options: $37,218,293
Current Obligation: $37,218,293
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DJA11ICO0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2015-01-01
Current End Date: 2016-06-30
Potential End Date: 2016-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-06-06
More Contracts from Rolling BAY, LLC
- FOR Critical Functions — $26.1M (Department of Justice)
- FOR Critical Functions Rolling BAY, LLC "subject to Availability of FY13 Funds" Start 01/01/2013 END 12/31/2013 — $23.0M (Department of Justice)
- Rolling BAY, LLC "subject to Avaiablity of FY11 Funds" Start 10-1-10 END 9-30-11 — $23.0M (Department of Justice)
- Rolling BAY, LLC — $22.3M (Department of Justice)
Other Department of Justice Contracts
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 3,500 LOW Security Male Inmates — $794.5M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)
- Detention Services - SAN Diego — $776.9M (THE GEO Group, Inc.)
- CO: Telly Renfroe Award of NEW Task Order Base Year Initial Funding — $616.4M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- TAS 151060 - Services for the Management and Operation of a Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated, Correctional Facility for 2,567 Beds in Adams County, Mississippi — $574.3M (Corecivic, Inc.)
- Provide Services for the Management and Operation of a Correctional Facility in Accordance With Rfp-Pcc-0014 — $568.9M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)