DOE's $31.9M contract for Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office support awarded to Performance Results Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $31,940,849 ($31.9M)
Contractor: Performance Results Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2007-08-01
End Date: 2013-07-31
Contract Duration: 2,191 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.6K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT TO THE PORTSMOUTH/PADUCAH PROJECT OFFICE. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO HAVE PERSONNEL PHYSICALLY LOCATED AT EACH OF THE PPPO OFFICES (LEXINGTON, KY; PADUCAH, KY; PORTSMOUTH, OH) AS ORDERED TO SUPPORT THE AFOREMENTIONED ACTIVITIES. CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL WILL BE REQUIRED TO ROUTINELY AND/OR PERIODICALLY TRAVEL BETWEEN SITES REGARDLESS OF WHERE THEIR OFFICE IS PHYSICALLY LOCATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSONNEL WITH THE EXPERTISE NECESSARY TO PERFORM THE SERVICES IDENTIFIED IN THE STATEMENT OF WORK AND AS ORDERED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER. SECTION B IDENTIFIES LABOR CATEGORIES UNDER WHICH THE EXPERTISE IS REQUIRED TO BE ENCOMPASSED.
Place of Performance
Location: LEXINGTON, FAYETTE County, KENTUCKY, 40513
State: Kentucky Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $31.9 million to PERFORMANCE RESULTS CORPORATION for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT TO THE PORTSMOUTH/PADUCAH PROJECT OFFICE. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO HAVE PERSONNEL PHYSICALLY LOCATED AT EACH OF THE PPPO OFFICES (LEXINGTON, KY; PADUCAH, KY; PORTSMOUTH, OH) AS ORDERED TO SUPPORT THE AFOREMEN… Key points: 1. Contract provides essential technical and administrative support for a key Department of Energy project office. 2. Requires personnel presence at multiple project sites, indicating a geographically dispersed operational need. 3. The contract duration of approximately six years suggests a long-term requirement for these services. 4. Services encompass a broad range of administrative and management consulting, vital for project oversight. 5. The contract was awarded competitively, implying potential for good value and market-driven pricing. 6. The use of labor hours indicates flexibility in resource allocation based on project demands.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's value of $31.9 million over six years appears reasonable for comprehensive technical and administrative support to a major project office. Benchmarking against similar large-scale project management support contracts within the Department of Energy or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the competitive award suggests that pricing was scrutinized against market rates. The flexibility of a labor-hour contract type allows for adaptation to evolving project needs, which can be cost-effective if managed efficiently.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating that it was subject to full and open competition. This process typically involves multiple bidders vying for the contract, leading to a more robust price discovery mechanism and potentially better value for the government. The presence of multiple bidders suggests a healthy market for these types of services.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring that the government receives services at a fair market price, minimizing the risk of overpayment and maximizing the efficient use of public funds.
Public Impact
The Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office (PPPO) benefits from consistent technical and administrative support, enabling efficient project execution. Services delivered include crucial management consulting and administrative functions necessary for complex government projects. The geographic impact extends to Lexington, KY, Paducah, KY, and Portsmouth, OH, supporting federal operations in these regions. Workforce implications include the employment of skilled personnel with expertise in administrative management and consulting, potentially creating jobs in the affected areas.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if labor hours are not managed effectively.
- Ensuring consistent quality of service across multiple physical locations could be challenging.
- Dependence on contractor personnel expertise requires robust performance monitoring.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process suggests a focus on cost-effectiveness and quality.
- Long contract duration indicates a stable, ongoing need for these critical support services.
- Flexibility of labor hours allows for adaptation to project scope changes.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is crucial for supporting complex government operations, including large-scale project management. The Department of Energy frequently utilizes such services for its extensive infrastructure and environmental remediation projects. Comparable spending in this category across federal agencies often runs into billions of dollars annually, highlighting the importance of efficient procurement and oversight.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. Therefore, the primary focus was on full and open competition. While there are no explicit subcontracting requirements mentioned for small businesses in this data, the prime contractor, Performance Results Corporation, may still engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill specific aspects of the work, contributing to the broader small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of Energy's contracting officers and project managers responsible for the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance standards and delivery requirements. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. The Inspector General's office for the Department of Energy would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Energy Project Management Support
- Federal Administrative and Management Consulting Services
- Environmental Remediation Project Support
- Government Technical Support Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep given the broad nature of services.
- Risk of inconsistent service delivery across multiple physical locations.
- Dependence on contractor personnel expertise requires diligent workforce management.
- Labor-hour contract type necessitates strong government oversight to control costs.
Tags
department-of-energy, administrative-support, management-consulting, competitive-delivery-order, project-office-support, lexington-ky, paducah-ky, portsmouth-oh, labor-hours, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $31.9 million to PERFORMANCE RESULTS CORPORATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT TO THE PORTSMOUTH/PADUCAH PROJECT OFFICE. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO HAVE PERSONNEL PHYSICALLY LOCATED AT EACH OF THE PPPO OFFICES (LEXINGTON, KY; PADUCAH, KY; PORTSMOUTH, OH) AS ORDERED TO SUPPORT THE AFOREMENTIONED ACTIVITIES. CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL WILL BE REQUIRED TO ROUTINELY AND/OR PERIODICALLY TRAVEL BETWEEN SITES REGARDLESS OF WHERE THEIR OFFICE IS PHYSICALLY LOCATED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSONNEL WITH THE EXPE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PERFORMANCE RESULTS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $31.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-08-01. End: 2013-07-31.
What is the track record of Performance Results Corporation in delivering similar technical and administrative support services to federal agencies?
Performance Results Corporation (PRC) has a history of providing support services to federal agencies. While specific details on past performance for similar large-scale DOE projects require deeper investigation into contract databases and performance reviews, PRC's engagement on this significant contract suggests they possess the requisite capabilities. A thorough review would involve examining past performance evaluations, any reported disputes or contract terminations, and the scope and complexity of services previously rendered to agencies like the Department of Energy or other entities with comparable project management needs. Understanding their historical success rate in meeting deadlines, budget constraints, and quality standards is crucial for assessing future performance reliability.
How does the per-contractor cost compare to industry benchmarks for administrative management and general management consulting services?
The provided data does not include specific per-contractor cost breakdowns or detailed labor rates, making a direct comparison to industry benchmarks challenging. The contract is awarded on a labor-hour basis, meaning costs are tied to the hours worked by different labor categories. To assess value, one would need to analyze the average rates for each labor category against market data from sources like the Bureau of Labor Statistics, industry salary surveys, or data from similar federal contracts. Without this granular information, it's difficult to definitively state if the per-unit cost is competitive. However, the full and open competition suggests an effort to achieve market-based pricing.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Key risks include potential cost overruns due to the labor-hour contract type if not managed diligently, ensuring consistent service quality across geographically dispersed sites, and the potential for contractor personnel turnover impacting institutional knowledge. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust performance work statements, regular progress reviews, clear communication channels between the government and contractor, and potentially performance incentives or penalties. The Department of Energy's oversight mechanisms, including contract surveillance and performance monitoring, are critical for identifying and addressing risks proactively. The long duration also presents a risk of evolving project needs not being fully captured by the initial scope.
How effective has Performance Results Corporation been in meeting the objectives of this contract since its inception?
Assessing the effectiveness of Performance Results Corporation (PRC) in meeting the objectives of this specific contract requires access to performance reports, government evaluations, and potentially feedback from the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office. The contract's duration (2007-2013) suggests that performance data should be available. Key indicators of effectiveness would include timely delivery of technical and administrative support, adherence to project milestones, successful resolution of issues, and overall satisfaction of the contracting officer. Without direct access to these internal government assessments, a definitive statement on effectiveness cannot be made, but the continued performance under the contract implies a level of satisfactory delivery.
What has been the historical spending trend for similar administrative and management consulting services at the Department of Energy?
The Department of Energy (DOE) has historically allocated significant funding towards administrative and management consulting services to support its complex mission, which includes energy research, environmental cleanup, and national security. Spending in this category can fluctuate based on project lifecycles, new initiatives, and budget appropriations. Analyzing historical spending trends would involve examining annual reports, budget justifications, and contract award databases for the DOE over several years. This contract, valued at approximately $31.9 million over six years, represents a substantial but not necessarily outlier investment for supporting a major project office like PPPO, reflecting the ongoing need for specialized expertise in managing large federal programs.
Are there any specific performance metrics or KPIs tied to this contract that indicate success or areas for improvement?
The provided data does not explicitly list specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or performance metrics for this contract. However, typical performance metrics for such administrative and technical support contracts often include timeliness of report submissions, accuracy of administrative tasks, responsiveness to requests, adherence to project schedules, and overall client satisfaction. The contract likely contains a Performance Work Statement (PWS) that outlines the required services and standards. Government oversight would involve monitoring PRC's performance against these unstated but implied metrics, with potential for award fees or penalties based on achievement.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: DERQ3007CC40009
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 444 TYRONE AVERY RD, MORGANTOWN, WV, 02
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Other Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $308,362,148
Exercised Options: $32,704,734
Current Obligation: $31,940,849
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0376M
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-08-01
Current End Date: 2013-07-31
Potential End Date: 2013-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-09-26
More Contracts from Performance Results Corporation
- Technial and Managment Support Services — $29.2M (Department of Energy)
- Provide Administrative Support Services to Netl — $23.4M (Department of Energy)
View all Performance Results Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)