DOE awards $29.2M for Technical and Management Support Services to Performance Results Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $29,237,997 ($29.2M)
Contractor: Performance Results Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2007-09-12
End Date: 2013-03-11
Contract Duration: 2,007 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.6K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: TECHNIAL AND MANAGMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: GERMANTOWN, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20874
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $29.2 million to PERFORMANCE RESULTS CORPORATION for work described as: TECHNIAL AND MANAGMENT SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Performance Results Corporation for $29.2M. 2. Services provided under a competitive delivery order. 3. Contract duration spans from 2007 to 2013. 4. The contract type is Time and Materials. 5. The awarding agency is the Department of Energy.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's total value is $29.2M over six years. Without specific per-unit cost data or benchmarks for similar technical and management support services, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing fairness. The Time and Materials pricing structure can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
This was awarded as a competitive delivery order, suggesting that multiple vendors likely competed for this specific task order. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government compared to sole-source awards.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is a positive sign for taxpayer value, as it implies that the government sought the best price and performance through a bidding process.
Public Impact
Government reliance on contractors for essential technical and management support. Potential for long-term contractor relationships impacting future competition. Importance of effective contract oversight to ensure value for taxpayer money. The specific services rendered are crucial for the Department of Energy's operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials contract type can inflate costs if not managed.
- Long contract duration (6 years) may limit flexibility.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes precise value assessment challenging.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive process.
- Contract supports critical agency functions.
- Established performance period.
Sector Analysis
Technical and management support services are common across many government agencies, often supporting core operational functions. Spending benchmarks vary widely depending on the specific services and agency needs. This $29.2M contract over six years represents a significant investment in maintaining operational capacity.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors on this award. Further investigation would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The competitive delivery order structure implies some level of oversight during the bidding process. However, the effectiveness of ongoing oversight throughout the contract's six-year term, particularly with a Time and Materials structure, is not detailed in this data.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Energy Contracting
- Department of Energy Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
- Long contract duration may indicate a lack of flexibility or market responsiveness.
- Limited transparency on specific services and performance metrics.
- Unclear small business participation.
Tags
department-of-energy, md, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $29.2 million to PERFORMANCE RESULTS CORPORATION. TECHNIAL AND MANAGMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PERFORMANCE RESULTS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $29.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-09-12. End: 2013-03-11.
What specific technical and management support services were provided, and how did their scope align with the $29.2M cost over six years?
The provided data lacks specifics on the exact services rendered. Understanding the detailed scope of work, including technical expertise, project management, and administrative support, is crucial for a thorough value assessment. Without this, it's difficult to determine if the $29.2M expenditure was justified relative to the outcomes achieved and the market rates for comparable services.
What were the key performance metrics and how did Performance Results Corporation perform against them throughout the contract's duration?
The data does not include information on performance metrics or the contractor's performance history. Effective oversight requires tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) to ensure the contractor is meeting contractual obligations and delivering quality services. Assessing performance is vital for determining if the government received adequate value and for informing future contracting decisions.
Were there any cost-saving measures or efficiencies implemented by Performance Results Corporation or the Department of Energy during the contract period?
The provided data does not offer insights into cost-saving initiatives. For a Time and Materials contract, proactive measures to control costs and identify efficiencies are essential. Understanding whether such measures were in place and effective would provide a clearer picture of the overall financial management and taxpayer impact of this contract.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: DE-RQ01-07EW07061
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 444 TYRONE AVERY RD, MORGANTOWN, WV, 02
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Other Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $34,563,987
Exercised Options: $30,610,467
Current Obligation: $29,237,997
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0376M
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-09-12
Current End Date: 2013-03-11
Potential End Date: 2013-03-11 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-10-24
More Contracts from Performance Results Corporation
- THE Contractor Shall Provide Technical and Administrative Support to the Portsmouth/Paducah Project Office. the Contractor IS Expected to Have Personnel Physically Located AT Each of the Pppo Offices (lexington, KY; Paducah, KY; Portsmouth, OH) AS Ordered to Support the Aforementioned Activities. Contractor Personnel Will BE Required to Routinely And/Or Periodically Travel Between Sites Regardless of Where Their Office IS Physically Located. the Contractor Shall Provide Personnel With the Expertise Necessary to Perform the Services Identified in the Statement of Work and AS Ordered by the Contracting Officer. Section B Identifies Labor Categories Under Which the Expertise IS Required to BE Encompassed — $31.9M (Department of Energy)
- Provide Administrative Support Services to Netl — $23.4M (Department of Energy)
View all Performance Results Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)