DOE's $16.4M Environmental Consulting Contract Awarded to Project Enhancement Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,417,670 ($16.4M)
Contractor: Project Enhancement Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2007-09-28
End Date: 2012-06-27
Contract Duration: 1,734 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.5K/day
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: DEACTIVATION AND DECOMMISSIONING POLICY, PROCEDURES, AND TECHNOLOGIES; WASTE ANALYSIS AND DISPOSAL; NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND SPECIAL NUCLEAR FUEL DISPOSITION PLANNING AND INTEGRATION; TRANSPORTATION & PACKAGING MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS; GROUNDWATER AND SOIL REMEDIATION; WASTE PROCESSING; AND VALUE ENGINEERING.
Place of Performance
Location: GERMANTOWN, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20874
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $16.4 million to PROJECT ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION for work described as: DEACTIVATION AND DECOMMISSIONING POLICY, PROCEDURES, AND TECHNOLOGIES; WASTE ANALYSIS AND DISPOSAL; NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND SPECIAL NUCLEAR FUEL DISPOSITION PLANNING AND INTEGRATION; TRANSPORTATION & PACKAGING MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS; GROUNDWATER AND SOIL REMEDIATION; WASTE PROCES… Key points: 1. The contract focuses on critical environmental services including waste management, remediation, and nuclear material disposition. 2. Project Enhancement Corporation, the sole awardee, has a significant role in the Department of Energy's environmental programs. 3. The contract duration of 1734 days suggests a long-term need for these specialized services. 4. The use of Time and Materials pricing may present cost control challenges if not closely monitored.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's value of $16.4M over approximately 4.75 years is moderate for specialized environmental consulting. Benchmarking is difficult without specific service details, but the Time and Materials pricing structure warrants careful scrutiny to ensure value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This appears to be a sole-source award, potentially limiting price discovery and competition. The justification for sole-source is not provided, which raises questions about whether full and open competition was explored.
Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this contract may result in higher costs for taxpayers if competitive bidding could have secured a lower price.
Public Impact
Ensures critical environmental cleanup and waste management operations for the Department of Energy. Supports the safe handling and disposition of nuclear materials, a high-priority national security concern. Addresses long-term environmental remediation needs, potentially impacting public health and natural resources. The contract's focus on value engineering suggests an effort to optimize costs for taxpayer benefit.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competition and price discovery.
- Time and Materials pricing can lead to cost overruns.
- Lack of detailed justification for sole-source award.
Positive Signals
- Addresses critical environmental and nuclear material disposition needs.
- Focus on value engineering indicates cost optimization efforts.
- Long-term contract provides stability for essential services.
Sector Analysis
The environmental consulting sector is vital for government agencies managing complex environmental liabilities and regulatory compliance. Spending in this sector often involves long-term remediation and waste management projects, with significant cost implications.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this contract. Further investigation would be needed to assess small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Energy is responsible for overseeing this contract. The use of Time and Materials and a sole-source award necessitate robust oversight to ensure cost efficiency and adherence to contract terms.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Consulting Services
- Department of Energy Contracting
- Department of Energy Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award potentially limits competition.
- Time and Materials pricing carries inherent cost escalation risk.
- Lack of transparency regarding sole-source justification.
- Potential for cost overruns without stringent oversight.
- Need for detailed performance metrics to assess effectiveness.
Tags
environmental-consulting-services, department-of-energy, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $16.4 million to PROJECT ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION. DEACTIVATION AND DECOMMISSIONING POLICY, PROCEDURES, AND TECHNOLOGIES; WASTE ANALYSIS AND DISPOSAL; NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND SPECIAL NUCLEAR FUEL DISPOSITION PLANNING AND INTEGRATION; TRANSPORTATION & PACKAGING MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS; GROUNDWATER AND SOIL REMEDIATION; WASTE PROCESSING; AND VALUE ENGINEERING.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PROJECT ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-09-28. End: 2012-06-27.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?
The provided data does not include the justification for the sole-source award. Typically, sole-source contracts are used when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. Agencies must document why full and open competition is not feasible. Without this documentation, it's difficult to assess if taxpayers received the best possible value or if competitive pressures were forgone.
How effectively was the Time and Materials pricing structure managed to control costs and ensure value for the taxpayer over the contract's duration?
The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing model can be susceptible to cost escalation if not rigorously managed. Effective oversight would involve detailed tracking of labor hours, material costs, and adherence to established rates. Without performance reports or audits, it's challenging to definitively assess cost control effectiveness. The contract's total value suggests significant expenditure, making diligent management crucial.
What were the key performance outcomes and environmental impacts achieved under this contract, particularly concerning waste analysis, disposal, and remediation?
The data focuses on contract award details rather than performance outcomes. To assess effectiveness, one would need to review project reports, environmental monitoring data, and compliance records related to waste processing, nuclear material disposition, and soil/groundwater remediation. The contract's scope implies significant environmental responsibilities, and measuring success requires evaluating the tangible results of these efforts.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Contractor Details
Address: 20300 CENTURY BOULEVARD, SUITE 175, GERMANTOWN, MD, 20874
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $17,670,927
Exercised Options: $17,670,927
Current Obligation: $16,417,670
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00F0004T
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-09-28
Current End Date: 2012-06-27
Potential End Date: 2013-05-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-06-14
More Contracts from Project Enhancement Corporation
- U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (doe/Nnsa)office of Counterterrorism and Counter-Proliferation (NA-80) Technical Support Services — $105.2M (Department of Energy)
- U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (doe/Nnsa)office of Emergency Operations (na-40)and the Office of Counterterrorism and Counter-Proliferation (na-80)technical Support Services — $80.9M (Department of Energy)
- NEW Support Service Contract, Training&federal Agent Support for Office of Secure Transportation - NA-15 — $50.9M (Department of Energy)
- THE Purpose of This Task Order IS to Provide the Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security With Technical and Administrative Support Services — $47.1M (Department of Energy)
- U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Office of the Associate Under (AU) Secretary for Environment, Health and Safety Technical Support Services Doe/Nnsa Teps BPA De-Na0003061 (mele) — $35.3M (Department of Energy)
View all Project Enhancement Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)