DOE/NNSA awards $80.9M for Technical Support Services under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $80,896,239 ($80.9M)
Contractor: Project Enhancement Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2016-07-01
End Date: 2022-09-08
Contract Duration: 2,260 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (DOE/NNSA)OFFICE OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS (NA-40)AND THE OFFICE OF COUNTERTERRORISM AND COUNTER-PROLIFERATION (NA-80)TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20585
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $80.9 million to PROJECT ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (DOE/NNSA)OFFICE OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS (NA-40)AND THE OFFICE OF COUNTERTERRORISM AND COUNTER-PROLIFERATION (NA-80)TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Significant contract value for specialized technical support. 2. Competition method was full and open, suggesting broad market engagement. 3. Contract duration is substantial, spanning over 6 years. 4. Focus on environmental consulting and counterterrorism support.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount is $80.9M over approximately 6 years. Without specific task order details or comparable contract data, assessing the value proposition is challenging. The benchmark of $35,795 for a similar contract suggests this award is significantly larger, potentially reflecting broader scope or different service levels.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing and allows for a wide range of potential contractors to bid. This method is generally expected to yield fair market prices.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential technical support services for critical national security and emergency operations within the DOE/NNSA.
Public Impact
Supports critical national security functions of the DOE/NNSA. Ensures availability of specialized expertise for emergency operations and counterterrorism. Contract duration provides stability for essential services. Potential for innovation through competitive bidding.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics or KPIs.
- Potential for cost overruns given the long duration.
- Limited visibility into specific task order costs and effectiveness.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Supports critical national security missions.
- Long-term contract provides service continuity.
Sector Analysis
The sector involves specialized technical and consulting services for government agencies, particularly in areas of national security and environmental management. Spending benchmarks for such niche services can vary widely based on expertise required and contract scope.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as 'sb' is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or achieved through subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting officers within DOE/NNSA, ensuring adherence to contract terms and performance standards. The long duration necessitates consistent monitoring to ensure value and effectiveness.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Consulting Services
- Department of Energy Contracting
- Department of Energy Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may lead to price escalation or reduced flexibility.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes effectiveness assessment difficult.
- Potential for scope creep over the 6-year period.
- No indication of small business subcontracting goals.
Tags
environmental-consulting-services, department-of-energy, dc, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $80.9 million to PROJECT ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION. IGF::CL::IGF U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY/NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (DOE/NNSA)OFFICE OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS (NA-40)AND THE OFFICE OF COUNTERTERRORISM AND COUNTER-PROLIFERATION (NA-80)TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PROJECT ENHANCEMENT CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $80.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-07-01. End: 2022-09-08.
What specific environmental consulting and counterterrorism services are included under this contract, and how do they align with NA-40 and NA-80 missions?
This contract likely encompasses a broad range of technical support, including risk assessments, emergency preparedness planning, technical analysis for counter-proliferation efforts, and potentially specialized scientific or engineering consulting. The services are crucial for the operational readiness and effectiveness of the Office of Emergency Operations and the Office of Counterterrorism and Counter-Proliferation within the DOE/NNSA, ensuring they have the necessary expertise to address national security threats and manage nuclear materials safely.
How does the $80.9M award compare to historical spending for similar technical support services within the DOE/NNSA?
Comparing the $80.9M award requires context on the specific services rendered and the duration. Given the 6-year period, the annual average is approximately $13.5M. This figure needs to be benchmarked against previous contracts for similar scope and complexity within the DOE/NNSA to determine if it represents a fair market value or an escalation in costs. The provided benchmark of $35,795 is too dissimilar in scale to be a useful comparison.
What mechanisms are in place to ensure accountability and measure the effectiveness of the services provided by Project Enhancement Corporation over the contract's lifespan?
Accountability is typically ensured through contract clauses requiring regular reporting, performance metrics (KPIs), and adherence to service level agreements. The DOE/NNSA contracting officers and technical monitors are responsible for overseeing performance, approving deliverables, and managing payments. Measuring effectiveness would involve evaluating the quality and timeliness of support, its contribution to mission objectives, and potentially periodic reviews or audits throughout the contract's 6-year duration.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: DE-SOL-0009699
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 20300 CENTURY BOULEVARD, SUITE 175, GERMANTOWN, MD, 20874
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $87,340,312
Exercised Options: $87,340,312
Current Obligation: $80,896,239
Actual Outlays: $21,891,557
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00F0004T
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-07-01
Current End Date: 2022-09-08
Potential End Date: 2022-09-08 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-09-09
More Contracts from Project Enhancement Corporation
- U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration (doe/Nnsa)office of Counterterrorism and Counter-Proliferation (NA-80) Technical Support Services — $105.2M (Department of Energy)
- NEW Support Service Contract, Training&federal Agent Support for Office of Secure Transportation - NA-15 — $50.9M (Department of Energy)
- THE Purpose of This Task Order IS to Provide the Department of Energy Office of Health, Safety and Security With Technical and Administrative Support Services — $47.1M (Department of Energy)
- U.S. Department of Energys (DOE) Office of the Associate Under (AU) Secretary for Environment, Health and Safety Technical Support Services Doe/Nnsa Teps BPA De-Na0003061 (mele) — $35.3M (Department of Energy)
- Nuclear Safety and Environment, Safety&health Technical Support Services to Support the Office of the Associate Under Secretary for Environmental, Health, Safety and Security Office (AU) — $32.8M (Department of Energy)
View all Project Enhancement Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)