DOE awards $14M for Management Consulting Services to Leidos Aspen Systems Corp
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $14,092,832 ($14.1M)
Contractor: Leidos Aspen Systems Corp
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2000-05-15
End Date: 2004-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,691 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.3K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 51
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: MARYLAND
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $14.1 million to LEIDOS ASPEN SYSTEMS CORP for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting. 2. Leidos Aspen Systems Corp. is the contractor. 3. The contract was awarded by the Department of Energy. 4. The contract duration is over 1600 days. 5. The contract type is competitive delivery order.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount is $14,009,283.13. Without specific unit pricing or comparison data, it's difficult to definitively assess value. However, the duration and total value suggest a significant engagement.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
The contract is listed as a 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER'. However, the specific competition method and how price discovery was achieved are not detailed. This lack of transparency makes it hard to evaluate the effectiveness of the competition.
Taxpayer Impact: The impact on taxpayers is moderate, given the $14M award. Ensuring competitive pricing and efficient service delivery is crucial for maximizing taxpayer value.
Public Impact
The Department of Energy utilizes consulting services for management and administrative functions. The contract spans several years, indicating a long-term need for these services. The award amount suggests a substantial investment in external expertise. The nature of the services (management consulting) implies a focus on improving operational efficiency or strategic planning within the agency.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed competition method.
- Limited transparency on price discovery.
- No specific performance metrics provided.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under a competitive delivery order.
- Significant contract value indicates agency reliance.
- Contractor has a substantial award amount.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under administrative management and general management consulting services, a common area of government spending. Benchmarks for this sector vary widely based on the specific services rendered and agency needs.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further investigation would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight of this contract would typically involve the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Ensuring adherence to contract terms and performance standards is key to accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Energy Contracting
- Department of Energy Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed competition information.
- Unclear price discovery mechanisms.
- No performance metrics provided.
- Potential for cost overruns without clear benchmarks.
- Limited transparency on small business participation.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-energy, md, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $14.1 million to LEIDOS ASPEN SYSTEMS CORP. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS ASPEN SYSTEMS CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $14.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2000-05-15. End: 2004-12-31.
What specific management consulting services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Department of Energy's mission?
The contract was for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611). These services likely encompassed areas such as organizational efficiency, strategic planning, process improvement, or program management support. The specific contributions would depend on the tasks assigned and the outcomes achieved, aiming to enhance the Department of Energy's operational effectiveness and achieve its programmatic goals.
Given the 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER' designation, what was the competitive landscape, and how was price reasonableness ensured for this $14M award?
While designated as competitive, the specifics of the competition are not detailed. It's unclear if this was a competitive task order against a pre-existing contract vehicle or a standalone competitive award. Price reasonableness would typically be assessed through market research, comparison of offers, or negotiation, but the exact methods used here are not specified in the provided data.
What is the assessed value for money considering the $14M award over approximately 4.5 years for consulting services?
Assessing value for money is challenging without performance metrics or benchmarks. The $14M award over 1691 days (approx. 4.6 years) averages around $3M per year. This figure needs to be evaluated against the tangible benefits and efficiencies gained by the Department of Energy from these consulting services to determine true value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Offers Received: 51
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)
Address: 2277 RESEARCH BLVD, ROCKVILLE, MD, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $-7,668
Exercised Options: $-7,668
Current Obligation: $14,092,832
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0070J
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2000-05-15
Current End Date: 2004-12-31
Potential End Date: 2004-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-04-05
More Contracts from Leidos Aspen Systems Corp
- Edpubs — $60.5M (Department of Education)
- Processing of Information, Complaints and Reports From Consumers Using the Do-Not-Call, Consumer Response Center, and Customer Information Systems of the FTC — $47.9M (Federal Trade Commission)
- Ncjrs Core Requirements — $42.2M (Department of Justice)
- Federal Contract — $42.1M (Department of Education)
- TAS::75 0849::TAS "support for the Cancer Information Service" — $39.7M (Department of Health and Human Services)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)