EPA Awards $19.5M for R&D to DYNAMC Corp, Full & Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,541,260 ($19.5M)
Contractor: Dynamac Corporation
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2000-12-15
End Date: 2005-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,842 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: R&D
Place of Performance
Location: ROCKVILLE, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20850
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $19.5 million to DYNAMAC CORPORATION for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to DYNAMC Corporation for $19.5 million. 2. Competition type: Full and Open Competition. 3. Contract type: Cost Plus Award Fee. 4. Sector: Research and Development (Physical, Engineering, Life Sciences).
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's Cost Plus Award Fee structure allows for potential overruns if performance targets are not met, but also incentivizes exceeding expectations. Benchmarking against similar R&D contracts is difficult without specific performance metrics.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of full and open competition suggests a robust price discovery process. However, the Cost Plus Award Fee structure can lead to higher final costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed closely.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for research and development, with the potential for value depending on the successful outcomes of the R&D efforts.
Public Impact
Supports scientific advancement in physical, engineering, and life sciences. Potential for innovation and new technologies to emerge from the R&D. Contract duration of over 5 years indicates a significant investment in the research area.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure can lead to cost uncertainty.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment challenging.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition promotes a competitive bidding environment.
- Long contract duration suggests a strategic investment in R&D.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences. Spending in this area is crucial for innovation but can be subject to inherent uncertainties in research outcomes.
Small Business Impact
No specific information is provided regarding small business participation in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if opportunities were missed.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's oversight would focus on monitoring research progress, adherence to cost controls, and achievement of award fee criteria. The EPA's contracting office is responsible for ensuring accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
- Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
- Environmental Protection Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics for value assessment.
- Uncertainty of R&D outcomes.
- Limited insight into small business participation.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, environmental-protection-agency, md, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $19.5 million to DYNAMAC CORPORATION. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DYNAMAC CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2000-12-15. End: 2005-12-31.
What specific R&D objectives were prioritized, and how will their achievement be measured to justify the award fee?
The specific R&D objectives are not detailed in the provided data. A thorough review of the contract's statement of work and performance work statement would be necessary to identify these objectives. Measurement of achievement would likely involve technical reviews, milestone completion, and evaluation of deliverables against predefined criteria to determine the award fee payout.
How does the Cost Plus Award Fee structure compare to alternative contract types for similar R&D projects in terms of cost efficiency and risk mitigation?
Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contracts offer flexibility for R&D where scope may evolve, incentivizing performance through award fees. However, they carry higher cost risk for the government than fixed-price contracts. For R&D with well-defined objectives, fixed-price incentive fee contracts might offer better cost control while still rewarding performance.
What is the potential long-term impact of this R&D investment on the EPA's mission and environmental protection efforts?
The long-term impact hinges on the success of the research. If the R&D yields breakthroughs in areas like pollution control, environmental monitoring, or sustainable technologies, it could significantly enhance the EPA's ability to fulfill its mission. Conversely, if the research does not yield actionable results, the investment may not translate into tangible environmental benefits.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Dynamac International, Inc (UEI: 074828419)
Address: 2275 RESEARCH BLVD, ROCKVILLE, MD, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business
Timeline
Start Date: 2000-12-15
Current End Date: 2005-12-31
Potential End Date: 2005-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-04-12
More Contracts from Dynamac Corporation
- Life Sciences — $132.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Research and Technology Development Services (R&T) - Providing Scientific, Engineering, Technical, and Documentation Support for the Various Areas of Research and Technology Development Work Within, BUT NOT Limited to, the Science Directorate AT Nasa ARC. Examples ARE Regenerative Life Support Research, Gravitational Biology Research, Infrared Detector Technology Development, Cryogenics Research, ETC — $20.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Technical Support — $14.1M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- On-Site Technical Support — $10.8M (Environmental Protection Agency)
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)