Department of Defense awards $70.5M contract for professional services to Engility Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $70,483,341 ($70.5M)
Contractor: Engility Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-08-01
End Date: 2008-08-31
Contract Duration: 1,857 days
Daily Burn Rate: $38.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200311!002228!2100!SW01 !DEF. CONTRACT. CMD. - WASHINGTON!GS10F0250K !C!N! !N!DASW0103F1044 !20030801!20040802!127110182!008898884!008898843!N!SYCOLEMAN CORPORATION !5170 SEPULVEDA BLVD SUITE !SHERMAN OAKS !FL!91403!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000003277194!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541618!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: HOPEWELL, HOPEWELL CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23860
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $70.5 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION for work described as: 200311!002228!2100!SW01 !DEF. CONTRACT. CMD. - WASHINGTON!GS10F0250K !C!N! !N!DASW0103F1044 !20030801!20040802!127110182!008898884!008898843!N!SYCOLEMAN CORPORATION !5170 SEPULVEDA BLVD SUITE !SHERMAN OAKS !FL!91403!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLIN… Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for administrative management and general management consulting services. 3. Performance period spans over 1800 days, indicating a long-term need for these services. 4. The contract was awarded to Engility Corporation, a known entity in government contracting. 5. The contract type is fixed-price, which shifts some risk to the contractor. 6. The contract is categorized under 'Other Professional Services', a broad service area.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount of $70.5 million over approximately five years suggests a significant investment in professional services. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for administrative and management consulting services within the Department of Defense is challenging without more granular data on the specific tasks performed. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the government has a defined scope and expects cost control from the contractor. The absence of specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns makes a definitive value-for-money assessment difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified in the provided data, which is crucial for assessing the intensity of the competition. A robust competition typically leads to better pricing and service offerings for the government. Without knowing the number of bids received, it's difficult to definitively state how well price discovery was achieved.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve the quality of services received. This approach ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, potentially leading to more cost-effective solutions.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely Department of Defense agencies requiring administrative and management consulting expertise. Services delivered are expected to support the operational efficiency and management functions of the Army. The geographic impact is centered around Arlington, Virginia, where the contracting activity is located. Workforce implications may include the employment of consultants and administrative staff by Engility Corporation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it hard to gauge effectiveness.
- Limited detail on the scope of 'administrative management and general management consulting services'.
- No information on small business subcontracting plans or achievements.
Positive Signals
- Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
- Fixed-price contract type can provide cost certainty for the government.
- Long performance period indicates a sustained need and potential for stable service delivery.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on management consulting. This is a significant area of government spending, as agencies often require external expertise to optimize operations, implement new strategies, and manage complex projects. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms vying for government contracts. The Department of Defense, in particular, is a major client for such services due to its vast and complex operational requirements.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no information available regarding subcontracting plans or performance. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, and the extent to which small businesses will participate in fulfilling this contract through subcontracting is not discernible from the data.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight mechanisms for this contract would typically involve the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Army, responsible for monitoring performance and ensuring compliance with contract terms. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract structure, where the contractor is responsible for delivering services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is limited by the available public data; while the award is recorded, detailed performance reports or audit findings are not readily accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Professional Services Contracts
- Management and Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracts
- Department of the Army Contracts
- Fixed-Price Contracts
Risk Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics.
- Limited detail on service deliverables.
- Unknown number of bidders in a 'full and open' competition.
- No information on small business subcontracting.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, professional-services, management-consulting, fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, arlington-virginia, large-business, administrative-services, general-management
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $70.5 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION. 200311!002228!2100!SW01 !DEF. CONTRACT. CMD. - WASHINGTON!GS10F0250K !C!N! !N!DASW0103F1044 !20030801!20040802!127110182!008898884!008898843!N!SYCOLEMAN CORPORATION !5170 SEPULVEDA BLVD SUITE !SHERMAN OAKS !FL!91403!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000003277194!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541618!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGILITY CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $70.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-08-01. End: 2008-08-31.
What specific tasks and deliverables were expected under this "Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services" contract?
The provided data offers a high-level description of the service category (NAICS 541611) but lacks specific details on the tasks and deliverables for this particular contract. Typically, 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' can encompass a wide range of activities, including organizational structure analysis, strategic planning, process improvement, policy development, and operational efficiency assessments. For this Department of Defense contract, the services likely supported specific Army initiatives or ongoing administrative functions. Without access to the contract's statement of work (SOW) or task orders, the precise nature of the work performed remains unspecified. This lack of detail hinders a thorough evaluation of the contract's effectiveness and value.
How does the awarded amount of $70.5 million compare to typical spending on similar consulting services by the Department of Defense?
Comparing the $70.5 million award to typical spending requires context on the duration and scope of services. This contract spans approximately five years (1857 days), making the annual value around $14.1 million. The Department of Defense is a massive organization with diverse needs, and spending on professional services, including management consulting, can vary significantly year to year and across different branches and agencies. While $14.1 million annually for consulting might seem substantial, it needs to be evaluated against the scale of operations and the specific challenges the Army aimed to address. Benchmarking against publicly available data for similar large-scale, multi-year consulting contracts within the DoD would provide a more accurate comparison, but such specific comparative data is not readily available in the provided snippet.
What is Engility Corporation's track record with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Defense?
Engility Corporation (which later merged with SAIC) has a significant history of performing federal contracts, including numerous awards from the Department of Defense. Their portfolio often included IT services, engineering, logistics, and professional support services. While this specific contract was awarded to 'SYCOLEMAN CORPORATION' according to the data string, the 'co' field lists 'ENGILITY CORPORATION'. Assuming Engility is the relevant entity, their track record with the DoD is generally extensive. However, the performance quality and value delivered can vary across contracts. A deeper analysis would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, any contract disputes, and the overall success rate of their previous DoD engagements to assess their reliability and effectiveness as a contractor.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?
The provided data does not include any information regarding Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or specific metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract. For professional services contracts, especially those involving management consulting, KPIs often relate to project completion timelines, adherence to budget, quality of recommendations, successful implementation of proposed changes, and client satisfaction. The absence of such data makes it impossible to objectively assess whether Engility Corporation met or exceeded performance expectations. Future analysis would benefit from accessing contract performance reports or any associated quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs).
How has historical spending on 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' by the Department of the Army trended over the past decade?
Analyzing historical spending trends for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611) by the Department of the Army requires access to comprehensive federal procurement databases covering multiple fiscal years. The provided data snippet represents a single contract award from 2003-2008. To understand broader trends, one would need to aggregate spending data for this specific NAICS code across various Army commands and contracting offices over a longer period. Factors influencing these trends could include shifts in strategic priorities, budget allocations, outsourcing policies, and the increasing complexity of military operations requiring specialized management expertise. Without this broader dataset, it's impossible to comment on historical spending patterns.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 008898843)
Address: 3750 CENTERVIEW DR, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $40,631,735
Exercised Options: $56,432,872
Current Obligation: $70,483,341
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0250K
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-08-01
Current End Date: 2008-08-31
Potential End Date: 2008-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-10-06
More Contracts from Engility Corporation
- IT Support for Network Operation and Security Center for Usafcent — $150.8M (General Services Administration)
- [piin: W912cm-05-D-0011-0011] Migrated Award & Mods UP to 0005 — $121.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $113.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200303!000021!1700!A8305 !naval AIR Warfare Center Trainin!n6133900d0032 !A!N! !N!0003 !20021203!20040614!177153319!008898884!008898843!N!L-3 Communications Government !3750 Centerview Drive !chantilly !va!20151!03000!013!51!arlington !arlington !virginia !+000039861464!n!n!000000000000!6930!operational Training Devices !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipme!2afx!f-18 Hornet !333319!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!a!u!m!2!002!b! !Z!N!F! ! !n!b!y!n! ! !Z! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $91.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200208!000084!5700!GV68 !esc/Ack !gs35f5396h !C!N! !N!F1962802F8162 !20020409!20040131!081080707!011147928!048341838!n!the Titan Corporation !1900 Campus Commons Drive !reston !va!20191!01375!037!24!andover Estates !ST. Mary S !maryland !+000011005449!n!n!000000000000!r499!other Professional Services !A7 !electronics and Communication !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !334290!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !y!c!n!n! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $86.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)