DoD's Army awarded $15.5M for administrative management consulting, with Engility Corp. as the prime contractor
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,554,586 ($15.6M)
Contractor: Engility Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-10-10
End Date: 2005-05-31
Contract Duration: 599 days
Daily Burn Rate: $26.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200401!000032!2100!W911S0!ACA, NRCC - GENERAL SUPPORT DIVI!GS10F0250K !C!N! !N!DABJ0103F1069!P00001!20031010!20040915!127110182!008898884!008898843!N!SYCOLEMAN CORPORATION, WHOLLY !5170 SEPULVEDA BLVD SUITE !SHERMAN OAKS !FL!91403!29216!650!51!FORT MONROE !HAMPTON (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000008737362!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!E! !6! ! !H! ! !99990909!B!E!N! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: FORT MONROE, HAMPTON (CITY) County, VIRGINIA, 23651
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $15.6 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION for work described as: 200401!000032!2100!W911S0!ACA, NRCC - GENERAL SUPPORT DIVI!GS10F0250K !C!N! !N!DABJ0103F1069!P00001!20031010!20040915!127110182!008898884!008898843!N!SYCOLEMAN CORPORATION, WHOLLY !5170 SEPULVEDA BLVD SUITE !SHERMAN OAKS !FL!91403!29216!650!51!FORT MONROE !HAMP… Key points: 1. Contract value of $15.5M for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating a focus on defense-related operational support. 3. The contract was competed on a full and open basis, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The duration of the contract was approximately 20 months, from October 2003 to May 2005. 5. The primary service category is 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services'. 6. The contractor, Engility Corporation, has a significant presence in the federal contracting space.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $15.5 million for administrative management and general management consulting services over a period of 20 months appears to be within a reasonable range for federal contracts of this nature. However, without specific details on the scope of services and deliverables, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services within the Department of Defense would provide a clearer picture of whether the pricing was competitive and represented good value. The fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that cost overruns were the responsibility of the contractor, which can be a positive indicator for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, meaning that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this contract. While full and open competition is generally preferred for maximizing price discovery and ensuring fair access to government contracts, the specific number of bidders can influence the intensity of competition. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more aggressive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to offer their best pricing and services, potentially leading to cost savings for the government.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Department of the Army, receiving support for administrative and general management functions. The services delivered are focused on enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of Army operations through expert consulting. The contract's geographic impact is centered in Virginia, where the contractor's facility is located and services were likely performed. The contract supports the federal workforce by engaging a private sector contractor for specialized management expertise.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if not clearly defined in the initial contract.
- Reliance on contractor expertise may lead to a knowledge gap within the agency if not managed properly.
- Ensuring contractor performance meets the required standards for administrative and management consulting.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
- Fixed-price contract type can provide cost certainty for the government.
- Contractor's location in Virginia may align with regional economic development goals.
Sector Analysis
The federal sector for administrative management and general management consulting services is a significant market within the broader professional services industry. This contract falls under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611. Spending in this category often supports government agencies in optimizing their operations, improving efficiency, and implementing strategic initiatives. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the average contract values and durations for similar consulting services awarded to agencies within the Department of Defense and other federal entities.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'ss': false. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem. Without specific subcontracting goals or reporting, it is difficult to assess the direct impact on small businesses through this particular award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be tied to the performance standards outlined in the contract and the firm fixed-price nature of the award. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, which provide public access to contract details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Defense-wide Administrative Support Services
- Management and Consulting Services for Federal Agencies
- Army Operational Support Contracts
- Professional Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for undefined scope impacting final cost.
- Reliance on contractor expertise may create agency dependency.
- Ensuring consistent quality of consulting services over contract duration.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, administrative-management, general-management-consulting, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, engility-corporation, virginia, professional-services, consulting-services, federal-contracting
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $15.6 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION. 200401!000032!2100!W911S0!ACA, NRCC - GENERAL SUPPORT DIVI!GS10F0250K !C!N! !N!DABJ0103F1069!P00001!20031010!20040915!127110182!008898884!008898843!N!SYCOLEMAN CORPORATION, WHOLLY !5170 SEPULVEDA BLVD SUITE !SHERMAN OAKS !FL!91403!29216!650!51!FORT MONROE !HAMPTON (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000008737362!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541611!E! !6! ! !H! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGILITY CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-10-10. End: 2005-05-31.
What was the specific scope of administrative and general management consulting services provided under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' under NAICS code 541611. However, the specific details of the services rendered, such as strategic planning, organizational analysis, process improvement, or policy development, are not detailed in the extract. Typically, such contracts aim to enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and overall management capabilities of the contracting agency. Further investigation into the contract's statement of work (SOW) would be necessary to understand the precise deliverables and objectives.
How does the awarded amount of $15.5 million compare to other similar administrative consulting contracts within the Department of Defense?
The awarded amount of $15.5 million for approximately 20 months of service places this contract in the mid-to-large range for federal consulting engagements. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare it against contracts with similar scopes of work, durations, and complexity awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies. Factors such as the specific expertise required, the level of the consultants engaged, and the criticality of the services would influence pricing. Without access to a comprehensive database of comparable contracts, a precise comparison is difficult, but this value suggests a substantial engagement.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Engility Corporation's performance on this contract?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or evaluation criteria used for this contract. However, for administrative and general management consulting services, typical KPIs might include adherence to project timelines, quality of deliverables (reports, recommendations), effectiveness of implemented solutions, client satisfaction, and achievement of defined project objectives. As this was a firm fixed-price contract, performance would likely be assessed against the requirements outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW), with penalties or remedies for non-performance.
What is Engility Corporation's track record with the Department of the Army and similar federal agencies?
Engility Corporation (and its predecessors/successors) has historically been a significant contractor for the Department of Defense and other federal agencies, providing a wide range of services including IT, engineering, and management consulting. Their track record would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, contract awards, and any documented issues or successes. A detailed review of their contract history with the Army would reveal their experience in delivering similar administrative and management consulting services, their ability to meet performance requirements, and their overall reliability as a government contractor.
Were there any significant challenges or risks identified during the performance of this contract?
The provided data does not detail any specific challenges or risks encountered during the performance of this contract. However, common risks in management consulting contracts include scope creep, difficulties in achieving desired outcomes, resistance to change within the client organization, and contractor performance issues. The firm fixed-price nature of this contract implies that the contractor bore the financial risk associated with cost overruns. Any significant challenges would typically be documented in contract performance reports or through formal contract modifications.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 008898843)
Address: 3750 CENTERVIEW DR, CHANTILLY, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0250K
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-10-10
Current End Date: 2005-05-31
Potential End Date: 2005-05-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-07-25
More Contracts from Engility Corporation
- IT Support for Network Operation and Security Center for Usafcent — $150.8M (General Services Administration)
- [piin: W912cm-05-D-0011-0011] Migrated Award & Mods UP to 0005 — $121.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $113.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200303!000021!1700!A8305 !naval AIR Warfare Center Trainin!n6133900d0032 !A!N! !N!0003 !20021203!20040614!177153319!008898884!008898843!N!L-3 Communications Government !3750 Centerview Drive !chantilly !va!20151!03000!013!51!arlington !arlington !virginia !+000039861464!n!n!000000000000!6930!operational Training Devices !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipme!2afx!f-18 Hornet !333319!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!a!u!m!2!002!b! !Z!N!F! ! !n!b!y!n! ! !Z! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $91.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200208!000084!5700!GV68 !esc/Ack !gs35f5396h !C!N! !N!F1962802F8162 !20020409!20040131!081080707!011147928!048341838!n!the Titan Corporation !1900 Campus Commons Drive !reston !va!20191!01375!037!24!andover Estates !ST. Mary S !maryland !+000011005449!n!n!000000000000!r499!other Professional Services !A7 !electronics and Communication !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !334290!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !y!c!n!n! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $86.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)