DoD's $230M contract with General Dynamics Mission Systems for electronic components shows long-term commitment

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $230,621,781 ($230.6M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-01-30

End Date: 2010-09-15

Contract Duration: 2,785 days

Daily Burn Rate: $82.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: SCOTTSDALE, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85257

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $230.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant long-term award valued at over $230 million. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open', suggesting broad market engagement. 3. Contract type 'Cost Plus Fixed Fee' carries inherent cost escalation risks. 4. Sector is 'Other Electronic Component Manufacturing', a critical defense supply chain area.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type, while allowing flexibility, can lead to higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts. The duration of the contract (2003-2010) also suggests potential for cost growth over time.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The 'Full and Open Competition' method is generally positive for price discovery. However, the long duration and CPFF structure may have allowed for cost increases over the contract's lifespan, potentially impacting the final price paid.

Taxpayer Impact: The long-term nature and CPFF structure of this contract warrant scrutiny to ensure taxpayer funds were used efficiently and that the final cost represented good value.

Public Impact

Ensures continued supply of critical electronic components for defense systems. Supports a major defense contractor and its supply chain. Long-term commitment may indicate unique or specialized component needs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under 'Other Electronic Component Manufacturing', a broad category essential for various defense platforms. Spending in this sector is often driven by technological advancements and long-term sustainment needs for military equipment.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not explicitly involved in this contract, as 'sb' is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontractors utilized by General Dynamics included small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), responsible for ensuring contractor performance and compliance. The long duration necessitates ongoing oversight to manage costs and ensure delivery.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-electronic-component-manufacturing, department-of-defense, az, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $230.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $230.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-01-30. End: 2010-09-15.

What was the final cost of the contract compared to the initial estimate, and how did the CPFF structure impact this?

The contract awarded was $230,621,780.95. Without the initial estimate and a breakdown of costs incurred, it's difficult to definitively assess the final cost's value. CPFF contracts inherently allow for costs to fluctuate, making direct comparison to a fixed price challenging. Post-award reviews or audits would be necessary to evaluate cost efficiency.

Given the contract's duration and CPFF structure, what were the primary risks to cost control and taxpayer value?

The primary risks stemmed from the CPFF structure, which incentivizes cost incurrence rather than cost control, and the extended period of performance (over 7 years). This combination increases the likelihood of cost overruns and potential inefficiencies. Without robust oversight and clear performance metrics, the government risks paying more than necessary for the components.

How effective was the 'Full and Open Competition' in achieving competitive pricing over the contract's lifecycle?

While 'Full and Open Competition' is a strong starting point for price discovery, its effectiveness diminishes over a long-term CPFF contract. The initial competition may have secured a reasonable baseline, but the flexibility of CPFF and the passage of time could erode competitive pressure on pricing as costs are reimbursed. Subsequent modifications or contract actions would be key indicators.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingSemiconductor and Other Electronic Component ManufacturingOther Electronic Component Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: WEAPONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 8201 E MCDOWELL ROAD, SCOTTSDALE, AZ, 85257

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-01-30

Current End Date: 2010-09-15

Potential End Date: 2010-09-15 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-22

More Contracts from General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

View all General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending