DoD's $246M contract for ADPE system configuration awarded to General Dynamics Mission Systems

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $246,002,288 ($246.0M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2002-08-12

End Date: 2007-04-02

Contract Duration: 1,694 days

Daily Burn Rate: $145.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200211!004189!2100!AB07 !USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0702CE801 !A!N! !N! !20020812!20050405!188991954!116187758!001381284!N!GENERAL DYNAMICS GOVERNMENT SY!400 JOHN QUINCY ADAMS RD !TAUNTON !MA!02780!69170!005!25!TAUNTON !BRISTOL !MASS !+000001726473!N!N!000000000000!7010!ADPE SYSTEM CONFIGURATION !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !334111!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B!C!N!A! !A!U!J!2!003!B! !Z!N!A! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001!

Place of Performance

Location: TAUNTON, BRISTOL County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02780

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $246.0 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: 200211!004189!2100!AB07 !USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0702CE801 !A!N! !N! !20020812!20050405!188991954!116187758!001381284!N!GENERAL DYNAMICS GOVERNMENT SY!400 JOHN QUINCY ADAMS RD !TAUNTON !MA!02780!69170!005!25!TAUNTON !BRIST… Key points: 1. Contract value of $246M over its lifecycle. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Contract duration of 1694 days. 4. Primarily for ADPE System Configuration services. 5. General Dynamics Mission Systems is the sole awardee. 6. Located in Taunton, MA.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total contract value is $246,002,287.69. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for ADPE system configuration is challenging without more specific service details. However, the duration of nearly five years suggests a substantial and ongoing need. The pricing structure is 'FIRM FIXED PRICE', which typically offers predictability but can lead to overpayment if costs are lower than anticipated.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION', indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited. The data indicates there were 3 bids received. A competitive process like this generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government compared to sole-source awards.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition suggests that taxpayers benefited from a potentially more competitive pricing environment, as multiple companies vied for the contract.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense is the primary beneficiary, receiving ADPE system configuration services. The contract supports the operational readiness and technological infrastructure of defense systems. The geographic impact is centered around the contractor's location in Taunton, MA, and potentially extends to DoD installations where the systems are deployed. Workforce implications include employment opportunities at General Dynamics Mission Systems and potentially its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader Information Technology and Defense sectors, specifically related to 'ADPE System Configuration' and 'Electronics and Communication Equipment'. The market for defense IT and electronic systems is substantial, driven by the need for advanced technological capabilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific nature of the ADPE systems and the complexity of the configuration services required.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that this was not a small business set-aside, and the prime contractor is General Dynamics Mission Systems, a large business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this data snippet. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not discernible from this record alone.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), as indicated by the 'sa' field. Accountability measures are inherent in the 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, though detailed performance metrics are often not publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, general-dynamics-mission-systems, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, massachusetts, taunton, adpe-system-configuration, electronics-and-communication, large-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $246.0 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC.. 200211!004189!2100!AB07 !USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0702CE801 !A!N! !N! !20020812!20050405!188991954!116187758!001381284!N!GENERAL DYNAMICS GOVERNMENT SY!400 JOHN QUINCY ADAMS RD !TAUNTON !MA!02780!69170!005!25!TAUNTON !BRISTOL !MASS !+000001726473!N!N!000000000000!7010!ADPE SYSTEM CONFIGURATION !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !334111!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $246.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-08-12. End: 2007-04-02.

What specific types of ADPE systems were configured under this contract?

The provided data identifies the Product Service Code (PSC) as '334111' for ADPE System Configuration and the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code as '334111' for Electronic Computer Manufacturing. However, it does not specify the exact types or models of Automatic Data Processing Equipment (ADPE) that were configured. This level of detail would typically be found in the contract's statement of work (SOW) or task orders, which are not included in the provided snippet. Understanding the specific systems is crucial for assessing the technical complexity and relevance of the configuration services.

How does the $246M contract value compare to similar ADPE configuration contracts within the DoD?

Directly comparing the $246M contract value to similar ADPE configuration contracts requires access to a broader dataset of historical DoD procurements with detailed service descriptions. Without knowing the specific scope, duration, and complexity of the configuration tasks performed, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, a contract of this magnitude, spanning nearly five years, suggests a significant and potentially complex undertaking. It is advisable to consult specialized contract analysis tools or databases that allow for filtering by PSC, NAICS, agency, and dollar thresholds to identify comparable awards and assess if this contract represents a typical or outlier investment for such services.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract?

The provided data snippet does not contain specific details regarding the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or deliverables for this contract. Typically, these would be outlined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or individual task orders. For ADPE system configuration, common deliverables might include successful installation and testing of hardware and software, system integration reports, configuration documentation, and performance validation. The 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' nature of the contract implies that the contractor is obligated to meet these defined requirements within the agreed-upon budget.

What is the track record of General Dynamics Mission Systems in fulfilling similar large-scale IT and configuration contracts for the DoD?

General Dynamics Mission Systems (GDMS) is a well-established defense contractor with a significant history of delivering complex IT, C4ISR, and mission systems solutions to the Department of Defense and other government agencies. While this specific contract represents a substantial award, GDMS has a broad portfolio of large-scale programs. Their track record generally includes experience with system integration, hardware/software configuration, cybersecurity, and lifecycle support for various defense platforms. A deeper dive into their contract history, performance ratings (if available), and past performance on similar programs would provide a more granular assessment of their capabilities for this specific type of work.

Were there any significant challenges or modifications to this contract during its performance period?

The provided data does not include information on contract modifications, challenges, or disputes that may have occurred during the performance period of this contract (2002-2007). Contract modifications, such as change orders or extensions, are typically documented separately and may affect the total value or schedule. Assessing potential challenges would require reviewing contract modification history, performance reports, or any publicly available audit findings related to this award. Without this additional information, it's impossible to determine if the contract encountered significant hurdles.

How does the 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' contract type influence the risk allocation between the government and General Dynamics?

Under a 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' (FFP) contract, the contractor, General Dynamics Mission Systems, assumes the primary risk for cost overruns. They are obligated to deliver the specified goods or services for the agreed-upon price, regardless of their actual costs. This provides the government with cost certainty and predictability. Conversely, if GDMS can complete the work under budget, they retain the savings, creating an incentive for efficiency. The government's risk is primarily related to potential quality compromises if the contractor seeks to reduce costs, or if the initial price was not adequately competitive.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingComputer and Peripheral Equipment ManufacturingElectronic Computer Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp

Address: 400 JOHN QUINCY ADAMS RD, TAUNTON, MA, 02780

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2002-08-12

Current End Date: 2007-04-02

Potential End Date: 2007-04-02 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2022-04-07

More Contracts from General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

View all General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending