Army awards $38.5M for Environmental Management Support, extending contract to 2001
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $38,482,844 ($38.5M)
Contractor: Concurrent Technologies Corp
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 1996-10-29
End Date: 2001-10-31
Contract Duration: 1,828 days
Daily Burn Rate: $21.1K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 199703!2100!0069!AE30 !U.S. ARMY ARMAMENT RD&E CENTER !DAAA2193C0046 !A!*!P00059 !19961029!19971231!030813091!030813091!030813091!N!99999!GEO-CENTERS INC !7 WELLS AVE !NEWTON !MA!02459!38288!021!42!JOHNSTOWN !CAMBRIA !PENN !0001!+000000078850!N!N!000000000000!AH96!RDTE/OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION-MGMT SUPPORT !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !7389!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!D !U!U!1!001!N!1G!Z!Y!Z!* !* !N!Z!*!*!*!A!A!A!*!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!
Place of Performance
Location: JOHNSTOWN, CAMBRIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 15904
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $38.5 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: 199703!2100!0069!AE30 !U.S. ARMY ARMAMENT RD&E CENTER !DAAA2193C0046 !A!*!P00059 !19961029!19971231!030813091!030813091!030813091!N!99999!GEO-CENTERS INC !7 WELLS AVE !NEWTON !MA!02459!38288!021!42!JOHNSTOWN !CAMBRI… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to GEO-CENTERS INC for environmental management support. 2. Significant value of $38.5 million over 1828 days. 3. Contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, indicating potential for cost overruns. 4. Sector is Defense, specifically R&D for environmental protection management. 5. Limited competition due to 'NOT COMPETED' status.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $38.5 million for a 5-year period is substantial. Benchmarking against similar environmental management support contracts is difficult without more specific service details, but the 'NOT COMPETED' status raises concerns about potential overpricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was explicitly marked as 'NOT COMPETED', indicating a lack of full and open competition. This significantly limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition suggests taxpayers may not have received the best possible price for these environmental management services.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying due to lack of competitive bidding. Environmental protection services are critical for military readiness and compliance. Long contract duration of nearly 5 years could lock in potentially inefficient practices. The specific environmental services provided are not detailed, hindering public understanding.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Long contract duration
- Unclear service details
Positive Signals
- Supports critical environmental protection mission
- Long-term commitment to a specific provider
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically supporting R&D for environmental protection management. Spending in this area is crucial for military operations and regulatory compliance, but competitive bidding is essential to ensure cost-effectiveness.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT COMPETED' status suggests potential weaknesses in the procurement process. Robust oversight is needed to ensure that sole-source or limited-competition contracts are justified and that pricing remains fair.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition raises concerns about fair pricing.
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure can lead to cost overruns.
- Limited transparency regarding specific services provided.
- Potential for contractor lock-in due to long contract duration.
- No clear indication of small business participation.
Tags
department-of-defense, pa, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $38.5 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 199703!2100!0069!AE30 !U.S. ARMY ARMAMENT RD&E CENTER !DAAA2193C0046 !A!*!P00059 !19961029!19971231!030813091!030813091!030813091!N!99999!GEO-CENTERS INC !7 WELLS AVE !NEWTON !MA!02459!38288!021!42!JOHNSTOWN !CAMBRIA !PENN !0001!+000000078850!N!N!000000000000!AH96!RDTE/OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION-MGMT SUPPORT !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !7389!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!D !U!U!1!0
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $38.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 1996-10-29. End: 2001-10-31.
What specific environmental management support services were provided under this contract, and how do they align with the Army's R&D objectives?
The data indicates the contract was for 'RDTE/OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION-MGMT SUPPORT'. While R&D (Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation) is mentioned, the specific services are not detailed. Understanding the precise nature of the support is crucial to assess its value and effectiveness in advancing the Army's environmental protection research and management capabilities.
What was the justification for not competing this contract, and were alternative sources considered?
The contract was marked 'NOT COMPETED', implying a justification was made for limiting competition. However, the specific reason is not provided in the data. Without this justification, it's impossible to assess if alternative sources were adequately considered or if this limited competition was truly necessary and in the government's best interest.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure impact the government's ability to control costs and ensure efficient service delivery?
A Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract allows the contractor to recover all allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. While it incentivizes the contractor to complete the work, it can lead to cost overruns if initial cost estimates are inaccurate. The government bears the risk of cost increases, potentially impacting overall value and taxpayer investment.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 100 CTC DR, JOHNSTOWN, PA, 15904
Business Categories: Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 1996-10-29
Current End Date: 2001-10-31
Potential End Date: 2001-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-06-03
More Contracts from Concurrent Technologies Corp
- Rdt&e Systems Operations and Maintenance — $193.7M (Department of Defense)
- 199808!2100!0494!AE30 !U.S. Army Armament RD&E Center !daae3098c1050 !A!*!* !19980430!20030430!189737810!189737810!189737810!n!0w151!concurrent Technologies Corpor!100 CTC DR !johnstown !pa!15904!38288!021!42!johnstown !cambria !penn !0001!+000002313250!n!n!000000000000!ah96!rdte/Other Environmental Protection-Mgmt Support !S1 !services !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !7389!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!D !u!u!1!001!n!1g!z!y!z!* !* !n!z!*!*!*!a!a!a!*!* !*!n!a!c!n!*!*!*!*!*! — $154.7M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $94.0M (Department of Defense)
- Basic Effort - Exercised Portion — $50.0M (Department of Defense)
- Operations and Sustainment, Technical Management, and Analytical Support to Mishap, Risk, Health and Resilience, and Drug Demand Reduction Education and Training, Implementation, Data Collection and Analysis, Reporting, Maintenance, and, Assessment for the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, USD (P&R), Personnel Risk Reduction — $49.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)