EPA awards $10.6M contract to TETRA TECH, INC. for environmental services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,620,139 ($10.6M)

Contractor: Tetra Tech, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 1999-12-15

End Date: 2006-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,481 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX (CITY) County, VIRGINIA, 22030

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $10.6 million to TETRA TECH, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to TETRA TECH, INC. for $10.6 million. 2. Services provided to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 3. Contract duration of 2481 days. 4. Awarded under full and open competition. 5. Contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Benchmarking CPFF contracts for similar environmental services is difficult without more detailed scope information.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more favorable pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more efficient use of funds compared to non-competitive awards.

Public Impact

Environmental protection services impacting public health and natural resources. Long-term contract duration suggests ongoing or significant project needs. Potential for follow-on work or expansion of services based on performance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically environmental consulting. Spending in this sector is driven by regulatory compliance, infrastructure projects, and research initiatives.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not involved in this contract, which could be an area for improvement in future solicitations to promote broader economic participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of CPFF contracts is crucial to ensure costs remain reasonable and the fixed fee is justified. The EPA's contracting office is responsible for monitoring performance and expenditures.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

environmental-protection-agency, va, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $10.6 million to TETRA TECH, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TETRA TECH, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 1999-12-15. End: 2006-09-30.

What specific environmental services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with EPA's mission priorities?

The contract likely covers a range of environmental services such as site assessment, remediation, consulting, and technical support. These services are fundamental to the EPA's mission of protecting human health and the environment, addressing issues like pollution control, hazardous waste management, and water quality.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract of this magnitude and duration?

The primary risks include potential cost overruns if the fixed fee is not adequately justified or if unforeseen complexities arise, leading to contractor incentives to increase costs. There's also a risk of scope creep and ensuring the contractor maintains efficiency over the long duration without adequate performance monitoring.

How effectively does the full and open competition method ensure value for money for this type of environmental service contract?

Full and open competition generally ensures value for money by fostering a competitive environment where multiple qualified bidders vie for the contract. This process encourages competitive pricing and innovation, allowing the EPA to select the best technical approach and cost proposal, thereby maximizing taxpayer value.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Contractor Details

Address: 3475 E FOOTHILL BLVD # 30, PASADENA, CA, 28

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Timeline

Start Date: 1999-12-15

Current End Date: 2006-09-30

Potential End Date: 2006-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2009-06-23

More Contracts from Tetra Tech, Inc.

View all Tetra Tech, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts

View all Environmental Protection Agency contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending