DoD's $12.8M CFSR Support Contract Awarded to PAE Aviation and Technical Services LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,825,436 ($12.8M)

Contractor: PAE Aviation and Technical Services LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-06-15

End Date: 2009-02-28

Contract Duration: 624 days

Daily Burn Rate: $20.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CONTRACTOR FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (CFSR) SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: MOUNT LAUREL, BURLINGTON County, NEW JERSEY, 08054

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.8 million to PAE AVIATION AND TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC for work described as: CONTRACTOR FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (CFSR) SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded under firm-fixed-price terms, indicating a defined scope and payment structure. 2. The contract was competed using full and open competition, suggesting a broad market search. 3. Awarded to a single contractor, PAE Aviation and Technical Services LLC, for specific support activities. 4. The contract duration was 624 days, spanning from June 2007 to February 2009. 5. The contract falls under 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' NAICS code. 6. The contract was not set aside for small businesses.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of $12.8 million for approximately two years of service needs to be benchmarked against similar support contracts for air transportation. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure implies that the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator if the price was competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which typically involves a broad solicitation to all eligible bidders. This method is designed to maximize competition and potentially achieve better pricing. The fact that only one award was made suggests that either PAE Aviation and Technical Services LLC was the sole responsive and responsible bidder, or it offered the best value among the competitors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and encourage innovation. However, the ultimate value depends on the number and quality of bids received and the evaluation process.

Public Impact

This contract provided essential support services for air transportation operations within the Department of Defense. The services likely contributed to the operational readiness and efficiency of military air assets. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around military air bases or operational areas where these services were required. The contract supported specialized technical services, potentially requiring a skilled workforce in aviation support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it hard to assess effectiveness.
Limited public information on the specific nature of 'CFSR Support' hinders understanding of value.
The contract's age (2007-2009) means current market rates and technologies may differ significantly.

Positive Signals

Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Firm-fixed-price contract structure shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Contractor, PAE Aviation and Technical Services LLC, has a history of performing government contracts.

Sector Analysis

The 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' sector encompasses a range of services essential for the functioning of air travel and logistics. This includes maintenance, repair, ground support, and operational assistance. The market size for such services is substantial, driven by both commercial aviation and significant defense sector needs. This contract fits within the broader defense logistics and support services market, where specialized technical expertise is often required.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, its direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal, as the primary award went to a larger entity. Future contracts in this category could explore small business participation through set-asides or subcontracting plans.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of the Army, likely through contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be tied to the firm-fixed-price terms and any performance standards outlined in the contract. Transparency is limited by the public availability of detailed contract performance data; however, basic award information is accessible.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Aviation Support Contracts
Air Transportation Services Contracts
Logistics and Maintenance Support Contracts
Federal Aviation Support Services

Risk Flags

Contract Awarded in 2007 - Data may not reflect current market conditions or technologies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.8 million to PAE AVIATION AND TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC. CONTRACTOR FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (CFSR) SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PAE AVIATION AND TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-06-15. End: 2009-02-28.

What specific services did 'CONTRACTOR FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (CFSR) SUPPORT' entail under this contract?

The specific services encompassed by 'CONTRACTOR FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (CFSR) SUPPORT' are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, Field Service Representatives (FSRs) provide on-site technical support, maintenance, troubleshooting, training, and operational assistance for complex equipment or systems. In the context of air transportation for the Department of the Army, this could involve support for aircraft, ground support equipment, communication systems, or related aviation infrastructure. The exact nature of the support would have been defined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW), which is not publicly available in this summary.

How does the $12.8 million contract value compare to similar contracts for air transportation support?

Benchmarking the $12.8 million value requires comparing it to contracts with similar scope, duration, and service requirements within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies. Given the contract's duration of approximately two years (624 days), the annual value is roughly $6.4 million. This figure needs to be assessed against the complexity and criticality of the support provided. Without specific details on the services rendered (e.g., number of personnel, types of equipment supported, geographic locations), a precise comparison is challenging. However, for specialized technical support in aviation, this value range is plausible, though a detailed analysis would necessitate access to comparable contract awards and their associated performance metrics.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. For a firm-fixed-price contract, performance is typically measured against the requirements outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW). Success would likely be defined by the contractor's ability to deliver the specified support services reliably, on time, and within the agreed-upon scope. Common metrics in such contracts might include response times for support requests, availability of personnel, successful completion of maintenance tasks, or adherence to safety and operational protocols. The absence of explicit KPIs in the summary limits a granular assessment of the contractor's performance.

What is PAE Aviation and Technical Services LLC's track record with similar government contracts?

PAE Aviation and Technical Services LLC, and its parent company PAE, have a significant history of performing various government contracts, including those related to aviation, logistics, technical support, and base operations, primarily for the Department of Defense and other federal agencies. Their portfolio often includes complex services requiring specialized expertise. While this specific contract was awarded in 2007 and completed in 2009, PAE's broader experience suggests a capability to handle such requirements. A comprehensive assessment of their track record would involve reviewing their performance history on other relevant contracts, including any past performance evaluations or awards/debarments.

Were there any identified risks or challenges associated with this contract during its performance period?

The provided summary data does not explicitly list any risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this contract. However, general risks inherent in large-scale support contracts include potential scope creep, unforeseen technical difficulties, personnel availability issues, logistical challenges, and changes in operational requirements. For aviation support, factors like equipment obsolescence, regulatory changes, or geopolitical events could also pose risks. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor bore the primary financial risk for cost overruns, but performance risks related to meeting service level agreements would still be present.

How has federal spending in 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' evolved since this contract was awarded?

Federal spending in 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' has likely seen fluctuations influenced by defense budgets, operational tempo, and technological advancements since this contract was awarded between 2007 and 2009. The Department of Defense, a major consumer of these services, often adjusts spending based on global security needs and strategic priorities. Post-2009, there may have been shifts towards more advanced technologies, cybersecurity considerations in aviation systems, and potentially greater emphasis on efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Analyzing trends would require examining historical spending data for the relevant NAICS codes (like 488190) across different agencies over the past decade and a half.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Support Activities for Air Transportation › Other Support Activities for Air Transportation

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W58RGZ07R0014

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: PAE Holding Corporation (UEI: 968071493)

Address: 12000 HORIZON WAY, MOUNT LAUREL, NJ, 03

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,825,436

Exercised Options: $12,825,436

Current Obligation: $12,825,436

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W9115104D0015

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline