Forest Service awards $17.75M for PM Support to Concurrent Technologies Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,750,992 ($17.8M)

Contractor: Concurrent Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2008-11-24

End Date: 2015-03-31

Contract Duration: 2,318 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.7K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: PM SUPPORT FOR HCM

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22209

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $17.8 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: PM SUPPORT FOR HCM Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Concurrent Technologies Corp for Program Management Support. 2. Services fall under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting. 3. The contract was a competitive delivery order. 4. Spending spans from 2008 to 2015.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award value is $17.75 million over approximately 6.3 years. Without specific unit cost data or detailed service descriptions, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the duration suggests a moderate annual spend.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

This was a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors likely had an opportunity to bid. The competitive nature of the award suggests a degree of price discovery, though the specific mechanism isn't detailed.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for necessary services.

Public Impact

Supports program management functions within the Forest Service. Services provided by Concurrent Technologies Corp. Contract duration of over six years. Awarded under the Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services NAICS code.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics.
Potential for scope creep over a long contract duration.
Limited transparency on specific deliverables.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process.
Clear identification of the service provided.
Defined contract period.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under administrative and management consulting services, a common area of government spending. Benchmarks for this sector vary widely based on the specific services rendered and the level of expertise required.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors in this award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the Forest Service contracting officer and program managers to ensure service delivery meets requirements. Accountability is tied to contract performance metrics.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Department of Agriculture Contracting
Forest Service Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration (over 6 years) may lead to price increases or reduced flexibility.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes objective evaluation difficult.
Potential for vendor lock-in if services are highly specialized.
Limited insight into the specific nature of 'PM SUPPORT FOR HCM'.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $17.8 million to CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP. PM SUPPORT FOR HCM

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Forest Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-11-24. End: 2015-03-31.

What specific program management functions were supported, and how did they contribute to the Forest Service's mission?

The contract details 'PM SUPPORT FOR HCM,' likely referring to Human Capital Management. Effective program management support in this area would streamline HR processes, improve employee services, and ensure compliance, ultimately contributing to the Forest Service's operational efficiency and ability to manage its workforce effectively.

How did the competitive bidding process ensure the best value for the government?

A competitive delivery order implies that multiple vendors submitted proposals, allowing the Forest Service to compare technical capabilities and pricing. The agency would select the offer that represented the best value, considering factors beyond just the lowest price, thus aiming to optimize resource allocation.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of the support provided?

The provided data does not specify the KPIs. Effective oversight would require clearly defined KPIs related to the efficiency of HR processes, timeliness of support, accuracy of information, and user satisfaction. These metrics are crucial for evaluating contractor performance and ensuring accountability.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 100 CTC DR, JOHNSTOWN, PA, 15904

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,750,992

Exercised Options: $17,750,992

Current Obligation: $17,750,992

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F0072M

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline