DOE awards $5.1M facilities support contract to Akima Facilities Operations LLC for 2.5 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,099,530 ($5.1M)

Contractor: Akima Facilities Operations LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 2025-02-26

End Date: 2027-03-31

Contract Duration: 763 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ADMINISTRATIVE, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, DRAFTER, MAINTENANCE, AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES.

Place of Performance

Location: LOVELAND, LARIMER County, COLORADO, 80538

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $5.1 million to AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC for work described as: ADMINISTRATIVE, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, DRAFTER, MAINTENANCE, AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential administrative, property management, drafting, maintenance, and engineering support. 2. Akima Facilities Operations LLC, a known entity, secured this award. 3. The contract is a delivery order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle, suggesting potential for future task orders. 4. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts cost risk to the contractor. 5. Awarded via full and open competition, indicating a broad search for qualified vendors. 6. The duration of the contract is over two years, providing stable support.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $5.1 million over approximately 2.5 years averages to about $2 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar facilities support contracts requires access to a broader dataset of comparable services and geographic locations. However, the firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally favorable for the government when scope is well-defined, as it caps the contractor's potential earnings and transfers cost overrun risk. The number of bids received (3) provides a limited basis for price assessment, but suggests some level of market interest.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. Three bids were received for this delivery order. While three bidders indicate some level of competition, it is on the lower end for a contract of this nature and value, which could potentially limit price discovery compared to a scenario with a larger number of competitive offers.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value by encouraging a wider range of potential contractors to bid, driving down prices through market forces.

Public Impact

The Department of Energy (DOE) benefits from consistent and reliable administrative, property management, drafting, maintenance, and engineering support services. These services are crucial for the operational efficiency and upkeep of DOE facilities. The contract is geographically focused on Colorado, supporting local infrastructure and operations within that state. The contract likely supports a workforce within the facilities management and engineering sectors, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in Colorado.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services fall under the broader commercial and professional services sector. This sector is characterized by a wide range of providers, from large corporations to specialized small businesses. The market size for facilities management is substantial, driven by the ongoing need for operational upkeep, maintenance, and administrative support across government and commercial entities. This contract represents a specific instance of federal spending within this sector, contributing to the overall demand for such services.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As such, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses mandated by a set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Akima Facilities Operations LLC, may choose to subcontract portions of the work to small businesses as part of their business strategy, which could indirectly benefit the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. They are responsible for monitoring performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and managing any modifications or disputes. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facilities-support, administrative-support, maintenance, engineering-support, property-management, department-of-energy, doe, colorado, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, akima-facilities-operations-llc

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $5.1 million to AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC. ADMINISTRATIVE, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, DRAFTER, MAINTENANCE, AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-02-26. End: 2027-03-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at the Department of Energy in Colorado?

Analyzing historical spending for facilities support services at the Department of Energy (DOE) specifically within Colorado requires access to detailed contract databases and filtering capabilities. Without direct access to such granular data, a precise historical pattern cannot be established. However, federal agencies like the DOE typically have ongoing needs for facilities maintenance, operations, and administrative support across their various installations. Spending in this category is often driven by the operational tempo of the facilities, infrastructure age, and specific mission requirements. Contracts can range from short-term maintenance tasks to long-term comprehensive support agreements. The current award of $5.1 million over 2.5 years suggests a consistent, medium-term need for these services in the Colorado region, aligning with the general expectation of sustained federal investment in facility upkeep.

How does the number of bidders (3) compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the DOE?

The number of bidders for federal contracts can vary significantly based on the contract's scope, value, duration, and the specific market conditions for the services required. For facilities support services, especially those involving a broad range of administrative, maintenance, and engineering tasks, a competition with three bidders is not uncommon, but it may indicate a less robustly competitive environment than ideal. Many larger or more specialized contracts can attract five, ten, or even more bids. A lower number of bidders, such as three, might suggest that the pool of qualified contractors is limited, the geographic scope is narrow, or the contract's specific requirements are highly specialized. This can sometimes lead to less aggressive pricing as the contractor faces less direct competitive pressure.

What is the track record of Akima Facilities Operations LLC in performing similar government contracts?

Akima Facilities Operations LLC is a subsidiary of Akima LLC, a company with a significant presence in government contracting, particularly in areas such as facilities management, logistics, and technical services. Akima LLC has a history of performing large-scale contracts for various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and other civilian agencies. While specific performance details for Akima Facilities Operations LLC on this particular type of contract would require a deep dive into contract performance reports and past performance evaluations (often not publicly detailed), the parent company's extensive experience suggests a foundational capability to manage complex operations. Government contractors are typically assessed on past performance during the bidding process, and Akima's established position implies they have met performance expectations on prior awards.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm-fixed-price contract for facilities support services?

Firm-fixed-price (FFP) contracts are generally favored by the government for well-defined scopes of work as they place the cost risk on the contractor. However, for services like facilities support, which can involve unforeseen issues (e.g., emergency repairs, unexpected equipment failures), there are potential risks. If the contractor underestimates the labor, materials, or time required to perform the services within the fixed price, they may incur losses. Conversely, if the scope of work is not precisely defined or if there are significant changes, the contractor might seek change orders, potentially increasing the overall cost to the government. Effective contract management and clear definition of services are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure the contractor delivers the required support without excessive cost overruns or scope creep.

How does the $5.1 million contract value compare to the overall federal spending on facilities support services?

The $5.1 million contract value for facilities support services awarded to Akima Facilities Operations LLC is a specific instance of federal spending. Overall federal spending on facilities support services is substantial, encompassing a wide array of contracts across numerous agencies and geographic locations. This includes everything from building maintenance and groundskeeping to complex engineering and property management. While $5.1 million represents a significant investment for this particular contract and location (Colorado), it is a relatively small fraction of the total federal expenditure in this broad category. Federal agencies collectively spend billions annually on maintaining their vast real estate portfolios and operational infrastructure, making this contract a component within a much larger spending landscape.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 89503224QWA000622

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Nana Regional Corporation, Inc.

Address: 2553 DULLES VIEW DR STE 700, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,429,989

Exercised Options: $6,485,988

Current Obligation: $5,099,530

Actual Outlays: $1,825,622

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSMS24D004S

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-02-26

Current End Date: 2027-03-31

Potential End Date: 2030-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-30

More Contracts from Akima Facilities Operations LLC

View all Akima Facilities Operations LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending