Department of Energy awards $13.8M for administrative and engineering support to S & K Logistics Services LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,810,016 ($13.8M)
Contractor: S & K Logistics Services LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2023-03-15
End Date: 2026-03-14
Contract Duration: 1,095 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THIS AWARD IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICE AND ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES UNDER IDIQ CONTRACT NO. 89303723DEM000011.
Place of Performance
Location: AIKEN, AIKEN County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29802
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $13.8 million to S & K LOGISTICS SERVICES LLC for work described as: THIS AWARD IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICE AND ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES UNDER IDIQ CONTRACT NO. 89303723DEM000011. Key points: 1. The contract focuses on administrative, engineering, and technical services, indicating a need for specialized support. 2. The award is a delivery order against an existing IDIQ contract, suggesting a pre-established relationship or framework. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs by setting a predetermined price for the services. 4. The duration of 1095 days (3 years) provides a stable period for service delivery and planning. 5. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, which may limit opportunities for smaller firms in this segment. 6. The geographic location of South Carolina is specified, potentially indicating a concentration of facilities or operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount of $13.8 million over three years for administrative and engineering support services appears to be within a reasonable range for such a contract. Benchmarking against similar support service contracts would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to manage cost predictability, but without detailed service breakdowns, a precise value assessment is challenging. The absence of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the spending.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
The contract is listed as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' which is a critical detail. This suggests that the award was likely made under specific circumstances, such as a sole-source justification, a follow-on to a previous contract where competition was previously established, or an emergency procurement. Without further details on the justification for 'not available for competition,' it is impossible to assess the level of competition or the number of bidders considered. This lack of transparency in the procurement process raises questions about potential price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: When a contract is not competed, taxpayers may not benefit from the competitive pricing that typically drives down costs. This can lead to higher overall expenditures for the government.
Public Impact
The Department of Energy benefits from essential administrative and technical support, enabling its core functions. Services delivered likely include operational support, facility management, and technical assistance crucial for DOE operations. The geographic impact is concentrated in South Carolina, where the services will be performed. Workforce implications may include the creation or maintenance of jobs for administrative and engineering professionals.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding raises concerns about potential overpayment and reduced value for taxpayer dollars.
- The 'not available for competition' status requires further investigation to understand the justification and ensure fairness.
- Limited transparency in the procurement process hinders a full assessment of the contract's value and efficiency.
Positive Signals
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- The multi-year duration offers stability for service delivery and planning.
- The award is made under an IDIQ contract, suggesting a potentially streamlined process for task orders.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which is a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. This sector is crucial for ensuring the smooth functioning of various government agencies. Spending in this area can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs, modernization efforts, and operational requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale support service contracts awarded by federal agencies for similar facility types and service scopes.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This means that the procurement was open to all eligible contractors, including large businesses. Consequently, there are no specific subcontracting requirements mandated for small businesses under this award. The impact on the small business ecosystem is neutral in terms of direct set-aside opportunities, but large prime contractors may still engage small businesses as subcontractors if it aligns with their business strategy.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. As a delivery order under an IDIQ, the initial IDIQ contract likely had its own oversight mechanisms. Transparency is limited by the 'not available for competition' status, making it difficult to assess public accountability. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Facilities Management Contracts
- Administrative Support Services
- Engineering and Technical Services Contracts
- Department of Energy IDIQ Contracts
Risk Flags
- Lack of Competition
- Limited Transparency in Procurement
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-energy, south-carolina, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, not-available-for-competition, administrative-support, engineering-services, technical-services, s-and-k-logistics-services-llc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $13.8 million to S & K LOGISTICS SERVICES LLC. THIS AWARD IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICE AND ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES UNDER IDIQ CONTRACT NO. 89303723DEM000011.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is S & K LOGISTICS SERVICES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-03-15. End: 2026-03-14.
What specific administrative and engineering/technical services are included under this delivery order?
The provided data indicates the award is for 'ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICE AND ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SERVICES' under IDIQ contract NO. 89303723DEM000011. However, the specific breakdown and scope of these services are not detailed in the summary data. Typically, administrative support can encompass functions like personnel management, financial processing, records management, and general office operations. Engineering and technical services could range from facility maintenance and repair, systems engineering, project management support, cybersecurity, to specialized scientific or research support, depending on the Department of Energy's specific needs at the facility or program this order supports. A detailed review of the delivery order document itself would be necessary to ascertain the precise nature and extent of the services required.
What is the justification for this contract being 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'?
The designation 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' implies that the contract was not awarded through a full and open competitive process. Common justifications for such a status include: sole-source procurement (only one responsible source can satisfy agency requirements), follow-on contracts where competition was previously established and a specific contractor is uniquely positioned, or urgent and compelling needs that preclude a competitive solicitation. Without the specific justification document (e.g., a Justification and Approval - J&A), it is impossible to determine the exact reason. This lack of competition can impact price and potentially limit innovation, making it crucial for agencies to adhere strictly to regulations when invoking such exceptions.
How does the $13.8 million award compare to similar administrative and engineering support contracts within the Department of Energy or other federal agencies?
A direct comparison of the $13.8 million award for administrative and engineering support services requires access to a broader dataset of federal contract awards. The value of this contract, spread over three years, suggests a significant scope of work. Benchmarking would involve identifying contracts with similar North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (e.g., 561210 - Facilities Support Services) and service descriptions awarded by agencies like the Department of Energy, Department of Defense, or General Services Administration. Factors such as contract duration, geographic location, specific service requirements, and the level of technical complexity would need to be considered for a meaningful comparison. Without such comparative data, assessing whether this award represents excellent, good, or fair value is speculative.
What are the potential risks associated with awarding a contract of this magnitude without full competition?
Awarding a contract of $13.8 million without full competition introduces several potential risks. Firstly, there's a risk of paying a higher price than would be achieved through a competitive bidding process, as the government may not benefit from the cost-saving pressures inherent in competition. Secondly, it can limit the pool of innovative solutions or approaches that different contractors might offer. Thirdly, it may create a perception of favoritism or a lack of equal opportunity for other capable businesses. Finally, without the vetting process of a competitive bid, there's a slightly elevated risk related to contractor performance or capacity, although this is mitigated if it's a sole-source award based on specific qualifications.
What is the track record of S & K Logistics Services LLC in performing similar government contracts?
Information regarding the track record of S & K Logistics Services LLC in performing similar government contracts is not provided in the summary data. To assess their past performance, one would typically consult resources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), or agency-specific past performance databases. These systems often contain ratings and feedback on previous contracts, including aspects like timeliness of delivery, quality of work, cost control, and overall customer satisfaction. A thorough review of their performance history is essential for understanding their reliability and capability in executing this $13.8 million award.
How does the duration of the contract (1095 days) align with typical support service contracts of this nature?
A contract duration of 1095 days, equivalent to three years, is a common and often preferred term for significant support service contracts. This duration provides stability for both the government agency and the contractor, allowing for effective planning, resource allocation, and the development of a strong working relationship. For services like administrative and engineering support, a multi-year term enables the contractor to build institutional knowledge and optimize service delivery. While shorter terms offer more frequent re-competition opportunities, longer terms can lead to greater efficiencies and potentially better value, provided performance is consistently satisfactory. The three-year period strikes a balance, offering stability without excessively long-term commitment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 138 PEACHTREE PKWY, BYRON, GA, 31008
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $14,002,459
Exercised Options: $14,002,459
Current Obligation: $13,810,016
Actual Outlays: $12,748,094
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 89303723DEM000011
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-03-15
Current End Date: 2026-03-14
Potential End Date: 2026-04-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-14
More Contracts from S & K Logistics Services LLC
- This Contract IS for the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (umtra) Project Technical Assistance Contract (TAC). the Requirements Were Set-Aside in Accordance With Section 8(A) of the Small Business ACT and Will BE Awarded on a Sole Source Basis to a Tribal Organization. the TAC Will BE Responsible for Records Management, Training, Information Technology and Telecommunications Infrastructure, Safeguards and Security, Safety, Quality Assurance, Property Management, Community Relations, Groundwater Monitoring, Sampling and Analysis, Groundwater Restoration and Compliance, and the Integrated Moab Project Baseline. the TAC Will Provide Services to DOE and in Support of the Remedial Action Contract (RAC) — $21.6M (Department of Energy)
- Contract Type: Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity Task Order Contract (idiq) Period of Performance: 12/12/2023 - 12/11/2026 Ceiling Value: $24M Contract Line-Item NO. 0001 Professional Support Services-Swat Ftes Contract Line-Item NO. 000 — $9.9M (Department of Energy)
- Incrementally Fund NEW Contract (12/30/2020 - 12/29/2021) for 2xnuclear Materials Positions on the Tech Contract — $2.6M (Department of Energy)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)