DOE awards APTIM Federal Services $161.3M task order for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory remediation services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,137,355 ($16.1M)
Contractor: Aptim Federal Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2024-03-05
End Date: 2026-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,031 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TASK ORDER FOR LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY BUILDING 281 DD&R
Place of Performance
Location: LIVERMORE, ALAMEDA County, CALIFORNIA, 94550
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $16.1 million to APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC for work described as: TASK ORDER FOR LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY BUILDING 281 DD&R Key points: 1. The contract focuses on remediation services at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, a critical national security and research facility. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a broad market search for qualified contractors. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), which can incentivize cost savings and performance but requires careful monitoring. 4. The duration of over 1000 days indicates a significant, long-term project requiring sustained effort and management. 5. The task order is a delivery order against an existing contract, implying a pre-established relationship or framework. 6. The specific remediation services are not detailed, making it difficult to assess the technical scope and associated risks without further information.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this $161.3 million task order is challenging without specific details on the remediation scope and comparable projects. The Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) structure introduces complexity; while it can drive efficiency, it also carries inherent risks of cost overruns if not managed tightly. The pricing will depend heavily on the labor hours, materials, and specialized equipment required for the remediation activities. Without a clear understanding of the unit costs for specific remediation tasks or a comparison to similar environmental cleanup projects at other national laboratories, a definitive value assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This task order was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that the Department of Energy sought proposals from all responsible sources. The number of bidders is not specified, but this approach generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings. The open competition suggests that APTIM Federal Services was selected based on a combination of technical qualifications, past performance, and price, as evaluated against other potential offerors.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a wider pool of bidders and encourages competitive pricing.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Energy and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, ensuring the safe and compliant management of environmental hazards. The services delivered will involve the remediation of contaminated areas, contributing to environmental protection and site safety. The geographic impact is localized to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory site in California. Workforce implications may include the creation of specialized jobs in environmental remediation, engineering, and project management.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- CPIF contracts require robust oversight to ensure costs remain within reasonable bounds and that incentives are effectively driving desired outcomes.
- The lack of specific details on the remediation scope makes it difficult to assess potential environmental or technical risks.
- The duration of the task order suggests a need for sustained project management and potential for scope creep if not carefully controlled.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive process that should yield fair pricing.
- APTIM Federal Services likely has relevant experience given the award for a significant remediation project.
- The task order is for a critical national laboratory, suggesting adherence to high standards of execution and safety.
Sector Analysis
The environmental remediation services sector is a significant part of the federal contracting landscape, particularly for agencies managing large industrial or research facilities like national laboratories. Spending in this sector is driven by regulatory compliance, legacy contamination cleanup, and ongoing operational needs. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large-scale environmental cleanup contracts awarded by agencies such as the EPA, Department of Defense, and Department of Energy at similar facilities.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify any small business set-aside provisions (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct set-aside for small businesses on this specific task order. However, APTIM Federal Services, as the prime contractor, may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill portions of the work, depending on their subcontracting plan and the nature of the services required. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether subcontracting opportunities are made available.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this task order will likely be managed by the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers responsible for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Given the nature of the work and the CPIF contract type, rigorous financial and performance monitoring will be essential. Transparency will depend on the DOE's reporting practices for task orders and the availability of performance metrics. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Operations
- Department of Energy Facility Management
- National Nuclear Security Administration Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract type requires careful monitoring for cost control.
- Lack of specific remediation scope details hinders risk assessment.
- Long contract duration increases potential for cost escalation and scope creep.
Tags
doe, lawrence-livermore-national-laboratory, remediation-services, environmental-cleanup, cost-plus-incentive-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, california, large-contract, national-laboratory, aptim-federal-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $16.1 million to APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC. TASK ORDER FOR LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY BUILDING 281 DD&R
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is APTIM FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-03-05. End: 2026-12-31.
What is APTIM Federal Services' track record with the Department of Energy and similar remediation contracts?
APTIM Federal Services has a history of performing various services for the Department of Energy and other federal agencies, including environmental remediation, engineering, and construction. Their track record with DOE would need to be reviewed for past performance on similar large-scale remediation projects, particularly at national laboratories. This would involve examining their performance ratings, any past disputes or contract modifications, and their experience with Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contracts. A review of their past performance on contracts of similar size and complexity would provide insight into their capability to successfully execute this task order and manage its associated risks and incentives effectively.
How does the $161.3 million value compare to typical remediation task orders at national laboratories?
The $161.3 million value for this task order is substantial and falls within the range of significant environmental remediation projects at large federal facilities. However, 'typical' can vary widely based on the specific contamination, the size of the facility, and the scope of work (e.g., soil remediation, groundwater treatment, demolition of contaminated structures). To benchmark this value, one would compare it to other task orders or contracts for remediation at facilities like Los Alamos, Sandia, or other DOE sites, considering factors such as the duration, complexity, and specific environmental media addressed. Without more granular data on the scope of work here, a precise comparison is difficult, but it indicates a major undertaking.
What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract for environmental remediation?
CPIF contracts, while designed to incentivize cost efficiency and performance, carry inherent risks. For environmental remediation, a key risk is that the 'cost plus' component could lead to cost overruns if the contractor's actual costs exceed initial estimates, even with incentives. The 'incentive fee' requires careful structuring to ensure it aligns with the government's objectives; poorly defined metrics or targets could lead to unintended consequences or disputes. Furthermore, contractors might prioritize achieving incentive targets over thoroughness or long-term effectiveness if not properly overseen. Robust government oversight, clear performance metrics, and detailed cost tracking are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure value for taxpayers.
How will the effectiveness of the remediation services be measured and ensured?
The effectiveness of remediation services under this CPIF contract will be measured through specific performance metrics and technical requirements outlined in the task order's Performance Work Statement (PWS). These metrics likely include achieving specific cleanup standards, meeting environmental regulations, timely completion of milestones, and adherence to safety protocols. The incentive fee structure is designed to reward the contractor for exceeding these targets or achieving them efficiently. The Department of Energy will employ quality assurance personnel and technical experts to monitor progress, review data, and verify that the remediation activities are meeting the defined objectives and regulatory requirements throughout the contract period.
What is the historical spending trend for remediation services at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory?
Analyzing historical spending trends for remediation services at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) would require accessing historical contract data for LLNL specifically. This would involve looking at previous task orders and contracts awarded for environmental cleanup and restoration activities at the site over several years. Trends might reveal patterns in the types of remediation needed, the average cost per project, the duration of contracts, and the primary contractors involved. Understanding these historical patterns can help contextualize the current $161.3 million award, indicating whether it represents a typical expenditure, an increase due to new discoveries, or a shift in remediation strategy.
What are the potential implications of the 1031-day duration on project management and cost?
A duration of 1031 days (approximately 2.8 years) for this remediation task order signifies a long-term, complex project. This extended timeline allows for phased remediation efforts, accommodates potential unforeseen conditions common in environmental cleanup, and provides time for monitoring and verification. However, it also increases the risk of cost escalation due to inflation, changes in regulations, or evolving project requirements. Effective project management will be critical to maintain control over scope, schedule, and budget. The longer duration necessitates robust communication, regular progress reviews, and adaptive planning to ensure the project remains on track and delivers the intended environmental outcomes within the allocated resources.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Veritas Capital Fund Management, L.L.C.
Address: 1725 DUKE ST STE 400, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,137,355
Exercised Options: $16,137,355
Current Obligation: $16,137,355
Actual Outlays: $6,780,762
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 89303320DEM000038
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-03-05
Current End Date: 2026-12-31
Potential End Date: 2026-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-26
More Contracts from Aptim Federal Services, LLC
- Ihnc 392 Permanent Protection & Advanced — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- L-575 Interim/Final Levee Repairs — $222.1M (Department of Defense)
- FT Mccoy Barracks Assessment and Repairs, Fort Mccoy, WI — $142.6M (Department of Defense)
- Dismantlement and Disposal of Navy Surface Ship Support Barge (sssb) Currently Located in Hampton Roads, VA Area — $133.8M (Department of Defense)
- DE23-1592 RED Hill Pipeline Removal, RED Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, Jbphh, HI — $133.0M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)