DOE awards $4.06M contract to ICF Incorporated for energy program administration under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,064,577 ($4.1M)
Contractor: ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2023-08-25
End Date: 2026-07-31
Contract Duration: 1,071 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: ORDER 89303023FSE000003 UNDER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S (DOE) THIRD-PARTY REBATE ADMINISTRATION BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) 89303023ASE00001 FOR THE OFFICE OF STATE AND COMMUNITY ENERGY PROGRAMS (SCEP) BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCTURE LAW (BIL)
Place of Performance
Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $4.1 million to ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C. for work described as: ORDER 89303023FSE000003 UNDER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S (DOE) THIRD-PARTY REBATE ADMINISTRATION BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) 89303023ASE00001 FOR THE OFFICE OF STATE AND COMMUNITY ENERGY PROGRAMS (SCEP) BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCTURE LAW (BIL) Key points: 1. Contract focuses on administrative management and consulting services for state and community energy programs. 2. Awarded under a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), suggesting a pre-established relationship and streamlined process. 3. The contract duration of over 3 years indicates a need for sustained support in program implementation. 4. Utilizes a labor hour pricing structure, which can be flexible but requires careful monitoring of effort. 5. The contract is a call against an existing BPA, potentially indicating efficient procurement. 6. The specific NAICS code (541611) points to a focus on management consulting, aligning with program oversight needs.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $4.06 million for a period of approximately 3 years appears reasonable for administrative management and consulting services supporting a significant federal initiative like the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Benchmarking against similar contracts for program administration and consulting within the Department of Energy or other agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The labor hour pricing structure, while common, necessitates diligent oversight to ensure efficient use of resources and prevent cost overruns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the competitive nature of the award suggests that the Department of Energy sought the best value through a transparent process. This approach generally leads to more favorable pricing and service offerings for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a marketplace where contractors vie for the best price and performance, ultimately benefiting the public through well-administered programs.
Public Impact
Benefits state and local governments by providing administrative support for energy programs funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Services delivered include program administration, management consulting, and potentially technical assistance to recipients of energy grants. Geographic impact is nationwide, as the Office of State and Community Energy Programs (SCEP) supports initiatives across the U.S. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized consultants and administrative staff within ICF Incorporated to manage the contract.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Labor hour contracts can sometimes lead to scope creep if not managed tightly.
- Reliance on a single BPA call might limit broader market engagement if not carefully monitored.
- The effectiveness of the administrative support will depend on the specific expertise of the contractor's team.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
- Contract duration of over 3 years allows for consistent program support and knowledge retention.
- The contract supports the implementation of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, a key national priority.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the administrative management and general management consulting services sector (NAICS 541611). This sector is crucial for government agencies to effectively manage complex programs and initiatives. The Department of Energy's reliance on such services for its energy programs, particularly those funded by large legislative packages like the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, highlights the growing demand for specialized consulting expertise in areas of policy implementation and program oversight. Comparable spending in this sector often involves significant investments in program management, strategic planning, and operational efficiency for federal agencies.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract, nor does it detail subcontracting plans. As this is a call against a larger BPA, the initial BPA competition may have included small business considerations. However, without further information, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific award is unclear. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of Energy, specifically the Office of State and Community Energy Programs (SCEP). As a call against an existing BPA, the foundational oversight mechanisms are likely established. Accountability measures would involve performance metrics, reporting requirements, and adherence to the terms of the contract. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though specific performance details may be proprietary. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Funding
- Office of State and Community Energy Programs (SCEP)
- Department of Energy Administrative Support Contracts
- Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs)
- Management and Consulting Services
Risk Flags
- Labor Hour Pricing Structure
- Potential for Scope Creep
- Reliance on Existing BPA
Tags
energy, department-of-energy, administrative-management, consulting-services, bipartisan-infrastructure-law, state-and-community-energy-programs, full-and-open-competition, labor-hours, blanket-purchase-agreement, virginia, federal-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $4.1 million to ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C.. ORDER 89303023FSE000003 UNDER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S (DOE) THIRD-PARTY REBATE ADMINISTRATION BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) 89303023ASE00001 FOR THE OFFICE OF STATE AND COMMUNITY ENERGY PROGRAMS (SCEP) BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCTURE LAW (BIL)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-08-25. End: 2026-07-31.
What is the track record of ICF Incorporated with the Department of Energy and similar federal agencies?
ICF Incorporated, L.L.C. has a significant history of contracting with the Department of Energy and other federal agencies, providing a wide range of services including management consulting, program support, and technical assistance. Their experience often spans areas related to energy, environment, and infrastructure. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those involving large-scale federal initiatives and program administration, would be crucial. This includes reviewing past performance evaluations, any documented issues or successes, and their ability to manage complex projects within budget and schedule. Their established presence suggests a familiarity with federal procurement processes and agency needs, which can be a positive indicator for contract execution.
How does the awarded amount compare to similar administrative support contracts for federal energy programs?
The awarded amount of $4.06 million for approximately three years of administrative management and consulting services for the Office of State and Community Energy Programs (SCEP) appears to be within a reasonable range for supporting significant federal initiatives. However, a precise comparison requires benchmarking against contracts with similar scope, duration, and complexity within the Department of Energy or other agencies managing large infrastructure or energy programs. Factors such as the specific services required (e.g., grant administration, technical assistance, policy analysis), the level of contractor expertise, and the prevailing market rates for consulting services would influence this comparison. The fact that this is a call against an existing BPA might suggest that some pricing structures were pre-negotiated, potentially offering efficiencies.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will success be measured?
While specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are not detailed in the provided data, contracts of this nature typically include metrics related to the efficient and effective administration of energy programs. These could include timeliness of processing applications or reimbursements, accuracy of data management, adherence to program guidelines, stakeholder satisfaction (e.g., state and community program managers), and overall contribution to the successful implementation of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law's energy objectives. The Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers would be responsible for establishing and monitoring these KPIs, likely outlined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) and performance clauses. Regular performance reviews and reporting would be used to assess ICF Incorporated's adherence to these measures.
What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Potential risks for this contract include scope creep, especially given the labor hour pricing structure, where the effort expended could exceed initial estimates without a corresponding increase in defined deliverables. Another risk is the potential for delays in program implementation if administrative support is not timely or efficient. Contractor performance issues, such as a lack of specialized expertise or failure to meet deadlines, also pose a risk. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract management by the Department of Energy, including clear definition of tasks, regular progress monitoring, performance reviews, and potentially the use of incentives or penalties. The competitive award process itself serves as a risk mitigation by selecting a contractor presumed to have the capability to perform.
How does this contract align with the Department of Energy's broader goals for energy transition and infrastructure development?
This contract directly aligns with the Department of Energy's broader goals by providing essential administrative and consulting support for programs funded under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The Office of State and Community Energy Programs (SCEP) plays a critical role in distributing funds and facilitating the implementation of clean energy projects at the state and local levels. By ensuring efficient program administration, this contract helps to accelerate the deployment of clean energy technologies, improve energy efficiency, and strengthen energy infrastructure across the nation. ICF Incorporated's services are thus instrumental in translating legislative funding into tangible progress towards the DOE's strategic objectives for energy transition and climate resilience.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: ICF International, Inc.
Address: 1902 RESTON METRO PLAZA, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $5,061,796
Exercised Options: $4,069,243
Current Obligation: $4,064,577
Actual Outlays: $3,014,823
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 89303023ASE000001
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-08-25
Current End Date: 2026-07-31
Potential End Date: 2028-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-06
More Contracts from ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.
- THE Strategic Objective of the Idds Activity IS to Strengthen the Detection of Diseases of Public Health Importance and Identification of AMR in Priority Infectious Diseases, and Improve the Quality of Real-Time Surveillance Systems for Existing and Emerging Pathogens. Idds Activity Will Directly Contribute to the Goals and Strategic Objectives of Usaids Infectious Disease Office in the GH Bureau. the Contractor Will Contribute to This Purpose by Addressing the Following Three of the Idds Activities IR 1 National Diagnostic Network Strengthened to BE Accessible, Accurate, Adaptable, Timely and Integrated, IR 2 National Indicator- and Event-Based Surveillance System Developed and Capable of Detecting Events of Significance for Public Health, Animal Health and Health Security, and IR 3 Evidence-Based Guidance and Innovative Solutions Developed and Applied to Strengthen In-Country Diagnostic Networks and Surveillance Systems — $135.6M (Agency for International Development)
- Defense Cyber Operations Research and Supporting Elements — $106.1M (Department of Defense)
- Child Welfare Capacity Building Center for States — $99.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- ACF Children's Bureau Cwig - ICF Base Award Hybrid Cpff/Ffp 09/25/2020 -09/24/2020 69 Clins — $95.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Saqmma09l0811 IS Awarded to ICF to Provide a Wide Array of IT Project Management Services. BPA Call Objective IS to Acquire Support Services to Improve CST S Continuous Improvement and Program Management Processes and to Assist in Relevant Operational Areas for CST. BPA Call Scope IS to Provide a Wide Array of IT Project Management Services in Support of CST S Mission — $65.3M (Department of State)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)