Kupono Government Services LLC awarded $105.5M for National Training Center mission support, with 45 months remaining

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $105,465,595 ($105.5M)

Contractor: Kupono Government Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 2018-09-19

End Date: 2025-02-05

Contract Duration: 2,331 days

Daily Burn Rate: $45.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CA,CF::IGF CLIN 1000 TRAINING MISSION AND SUPPORT AT THE NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER

Place of Performance

Location: ALBUQUERQUE, BERNALILLO County, NEW MEXICO, 87185

State: New Mexico Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $105.5 million to KUPONO GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC for work described as: IGF::CA,CF::IGF CLIN 1000 TRAINING MISSION AND SUPPORT AT THE NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and scope of training and support services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a stable contractor and a long-standing contract vehicle. 4. Performance context is within a critical national training facility, implying high stakes for service delivery. 5. Sector positioning is within professional development and management training, a common government need.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $105.5 million over its potential period, including options, is substantial. Benchmarking against similar large-scale training and support contracts for federal facilities is challenging without more specific service details. However, the duration of the contract (over 6 years if all options are exercised) and the nature of supporting a National Training Center suggest a complex and critical requirement. The pricing structure, likely time and materials with fixed labor rates, needs careful monitoring to ensure efficiency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to more favorable pricing and innovative solutions for the government. The agency's decision to use full and open competition suggests confidence in the market's ability to meet the requirement.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the potential for cost savings and improved service quality that can arise from a robust competitive process.

Public Impact

Military personnel and civilian trainees at the National Training Center benefit from enhanced mission readiness and operational effectiveness. The contract delivers essential training, mission support, and logistical services critical to national security operations. Geographic impact is primarily focused on the National Training Center in New Mexico, supporting a key federal training installation. Workforce implications include direct employment for Kupono Government Services staff and indirect support for the military and civilian personnel undergoing training.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The professional and management development training sector (NAICS 611430) is a significant market within government contracting. This contract fits within the broader landscape of support services for federal training facilities and operational readiness. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar large-scale training support contracts can vary widely based on the specific services, location, and duration. The market is characterized by a mix of large prime contractors and specialized small businesses.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the prime contractor, Kupono Government Services, LLC, is not identified as a small business. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The absence of a small business set-aside or specific subcontracting goals could mean limited direct opportunities for small businesses on this particular contract, though they may participate as subcontractors if the prime contractor opts to engage them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of Energy. Accountability measures would include performance metrics, delivery schedules, and quality standards outlined in the contract. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

training, mission-support, national-training-center, kupono-government-services, department-of-energy, new-mexico, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, time-and-materials, professional-development, management-training

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $105.5 million to KUPONO GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC. IGF::CA,CF::IGF CLIN 1000 TRAINING MISSION AND SUPPORT AT THE NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KUPONO GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $105.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-09-19. End: 2025-02-05.

What is Kupono Government Services, LLC's track record with similar large-scale training and support contracts?

Information on Kupono Government Services, LLC's specific track record with large-scale training and support contracts is not detailed in the provided data. However, the award of a significant contract like this one by the Department of Energy suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and past performance to meet the government's requirements. Further investigation into their contract history, client feedback, and performance ratings on federal procurement platforms (like SAM.gov or FPDS) would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment. Their ability to secure and manage a contract of this magnitude indicates a level of established capability and experience within the government contracting space.

How does the awarded value compare to similar training and support contracts for federal facilities?

Direct comparison of the $105.5 million contract value to similar training and support contracts is difficult without more granular data on the specific services, scope, and duration of comparable contracts. However, for a multi-year contract supporting a major federal training installation like the National Training Center, this value appears within a reasonable range. Contracts for large-scale operational support, logistics, and specialized training can easily reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars over their lifecycle. Factors such as the complexity of training scenarios, the number of personnel supported, and the required technological infrastructure significantly influence contract values in this domain.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract?

The primary risk indicators for this contract include the potential for cost overruns inherent in Time and Materials (T&M) contract types, especially if not rigorously monitored. Dependence on a single contractor for critical mission support functions also presents a risk if performance falters or if unforeseen issues arise. Ensuring consistent quality of training and support across the entire performance period is another key risk area. Given the long duration, maintaining contractor engagement and adapting to evolving training needs will be crucial. However, the use of full and open competition and the contractor's established presence suggest these risks may be mitigated.

How effective is the current contract in meeting the training objectives of the National Training Center?

The effectiveness of the current contract in meeting the training objectives of the National Training Center cannot be definitively assessed solely from the provided award data. Effectiveness is typically measured through performance metrics, user feedback, and the achievement of specific training outcomes, none of which are detailed here. The contract's continuation and substantial value suggest that the services provided are considered essential and likely meet a baseline level of effectiveness. Ongoing performance evaluations and feedback from the end-users (military personnel and trainees) would be critical to a thorough assessment of its impact on mission readiness.

What are the historical spending patterns for training and support at the National Training Center?

Historical spending patterns for training and support at the National Training Center are not provided in the current data. This award represents a specific contract action. To understand historical spending, one would need to examine previous contracts awarded for similar services at this facility, potentially including predecessor contracts held by other firms or earlier iterations of this contract. Analyzing trends in spending over time, including the number of contracts, their values, and the contractors involved, would offer insights into the government's investment in supporting the National Training Center's mission and how that investment has evolved.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the small business ecosystem?

As this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not appear to have specific small business set-aside provisions or explicit subcontracting goals mentioned, its direct positive impact on the small business ecosystem might be limited. Small businesses are less likely to be prime contractors on this award. However, there is potential for small businesses to participate as subcontractors if Kupono Government Services, LLC chooses to engage them for specialized services or support. The overall impact depends on the prime contractor's subcontracting strategy and the availability of relevant small business capabilities in the market.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational ServicesBusiness Schools and Computer and Management TrainingProfessional and Management Development Training

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAININGEDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1600 KAPIOLANI BLVD STE 530, HONOLULU, HI, 96814

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native Hawaiian Organization Owned Firm, Other Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $116,718,613

Exercised Options: $116,718,613

Current Obligation: $105,465,595

Actual Outlays: $77,330,373

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 89303018DEA000003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2018-09-19

Current End Date: 2025-02-05

Potential End Date: 2025-02-05 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-05-28

More Contracts from Kupono Government Services, LLC

View all Kupono Government Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending