Department of Energy awards $10M facilities support contract to The Building People LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,000,400 ($1.0M)

Contractor: THE Building People LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 2025-01-31

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 454 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE.

Place of Performance

Location: GOLDEN, JEFFERSON County, COLORADO, 80401

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $1.0 million to THE BUILDING PEOPLE LLC for work described as: BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the duration and scope of facilities support services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process was utilized. 3. The Building People LLC's track record with the Department of Energy warrants further review. 4. Contract performance will be key to ensuring value for taxpayer dollars. 5. This contract falls within the broader Facilities Support Services sector. 6. The time and materials pricing structure introduces potential cost variability.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's total value of approximately $10 million over its period of performance (454 days) suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts within the Department of Energy or other federal agencies would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The time and materials (T&M) pricing model, while common for services with uncertain scope, can lead to higher costs if not closely managed and monitored for efficiency. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the overall award size is not immediately indicative of overspending.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition was intended and likely occurred, which is a positive sign for price discovery and achieving fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by driving down prices and encouraging innovation from contractors.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of Energy, which will receive essential facilities support services. Services include maintenance, repair, and operational support for buildings and infrastructure. The contract's geographic impact is focused on facilities managed by the Department of Energy, primarily in Colorado. Workforce implications may include the direct employment of personnel by The Building People LLC and potential subcontracting opportunities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which encompasses a wide range of services related to the operation, maintenance, and management of buildings and infrastructure. This sector is crucial for government operations, ensuring that federal facilities are safe, functional, and efficient. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs, modernization efforts, and agency priorities. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the total federal expenditure on facilities management across various agencies and contract types.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications mandated by a small business set-aside. However, the prime contractor, The Building People LLC, may still choose to engage small businesses as subcontractors to leverage specialized expertise or meet broader corporate social responsibility goals. The absence of a set-aside means that opportunities for small businesses are not guaranteed through this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures will be tied to the performance standards outlined in the contract and the terms of the time and materials pricing. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal procurement databases where contract awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract were to arise.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facilities-support, department-of-energy, colorado, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, facilities-management, building-technologies-office, bpa-call, medium-value-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $1.0 million to THE BUILDING PEOPLE LLC. BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BUILDING PEOPLE LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-01-31. End: 2026-04-30.

What is the past performance record of The Building People LLC with the Department of Energy and similar federal agencies?

Assessing the past performance of The Building People LLC is crucial for understanding their reliability and capability in delivering services similar to those required under this contract. A review of their contract history with the Department of Energy (DOE) and other federal agencies would reveal their track record in terms of on-time delivery, quality of work, adherence to budget, and overall client satisfaction. Federal procurement systems often contain performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) that provide insights into a contractor's history. Positive past performance suggests a lower risk for this new contract, while negative feedback would raise concerns about potential issues in execution, cost control, or compliance.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated value or budget for these facilities support services?

The awarded amount of approximately $10 million for 454 days of service provides a baseline for comparison. To assess value, this figure needs to be benchmarked against the government's internal cost estimates for these services, if available, or against industry standards for similar facilities support contracts. Factors such as the specific services required (e.g., routine maintenance vs. complex repairs), the geographic location (Colorado), and the type of facilities being supported (e.g., office buildings, laboratories) will influence cost. A comparison with the average cost per day or per square foot for similar federal contracts can indicate whether this award represents good or fair value. Without access to the government's independent cost estimate or detailed service scope, a precise value-for-money assessment remains preliminary.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for facilities support?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, like the one awarded to The Building People LLC, carry inherent risks primarily related to cost control. The government pays for the actual labor hours and materials used, plus a fixed fee or நிர்ணயிக்கப்பட்ட rate. This structure can lead to cost overruns if the contractor's efficiency is low, if the scope of work expands unexpectedly without proper controls, or if labor hours are not meticulously tracked and justified. The risk for the government is paying more than anticipated if the project takes longer or requires more resources than initially foreseen. Effective oversight, detailed reporting requirements, and clear definitions of 'materials' and 'labor categories' are essential to mitigate these risks.

How does the competition level (full and open) typically influence pricing and contractor performance for facilities support services?

A 'full and open' competition signifies that the Department of Energy sought bids from all responsible sources, fostering a competitive environment. This typically drives down prices as contractors vie for the award by offering their most competitive rates and solutions. It also encourages higher performance standards, as contractors aim to differentiate themselves based on quality and efficiency to win the contract and potentially secure future work. The presence of multiple bidders generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government is likely receiving fair market value. Conversely, if only a few bids were received, the competitive pressure might be less intense, potentially impacting the final price and the range of innovative solutions offered.

What is the historical spending trend for facilities support services within the Department of Energy's Building Technologies Office?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the Department of Energy's Building Technologies Office (BTO) is essential for contextualizing this $10 million award. Understanding previous contract values, durations, and the number of awards made over time can reveal trends in resource allocation and the agency's reliance on external support. If historical spending has been consistently high, this award might represent a continuation of established operational needs. Conversely, a significant increase or decrease in spending could signal shifts in agency priorities, budget constraints, or changes in how facilities are managed. Data on past contracts, including the types of services procured and the contractors involved, would provide a more robust understanding of the BTO's facilities support expenditure landscape.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 215 DEPOT CT SE, LEESBURG, VA, 20175

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Hispanic American Owned Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,000,400

Exercised Options: $1,000,400

Current Obligation: $1,000,400

Actual Outlays: $774,140

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 89243423AEE000005

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-01-31

Current End Date: 2026-04-30

Potential End Date: 2026-04-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-02

More Contracts from THE Building People LLC

View all THE Building People LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending