DOE awards $19.7M technical support contract to Technomics Inc. for NNSA, emphasizing engineering services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,706,273 ($19.7M)
Contractor: Technomics Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2024-12-05
End Date: 2026-06-01
Contract Duration: 543 days
Daily Burn Rate: $36.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TEP III ORDER TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO THE NNSA.
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20585
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $19.7 million to TECHNOMICS INC for work described as: TEP III ORDER TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO THE NNSA. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the duration and scope of technical support required. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. This contract supports critical technical functions for the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). 5. The contract is positioned within the engineering services sector, a key area for government technical support. 6. Performance duration of over 1.5 years indicates a significant, ongoing need for these services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $19.7 million over 543 days (roughly 1.5 years) for technical support to the NNSA seems aligned with industry standards for specialized engineering services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for technical advisory and management support within the Department of Energy (DOE) or other defense-related agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions. The number of bidders is not specified, but the method of competition suggests a robust process aimed at achieving fair market value.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is the most advantageous for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for competitive pricing and ensures that the government receives the best possible value by considering a wide range of qualified offerors.
Public Impact
The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) benefits from enhanced technical support, aiding its mission. Specialized engineering services are delivered, likely contributing to program management, analysis, and technical oversight. The contract's impact is primarily national, supporting a federal agency's operations. The contract supports a workforce skilled in engineering and technical support roles.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if technical requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical technical support could pose a risk if performance falters.
- Ensuring continued alignment with evolving NNSA technical needs throughout the contract period.
Positive Signals
- Fixed-price contract structure incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
- Full and open competition suggests a strong market offering and potential for competitive pricing.
- The contractor, Technomics Inc., is likely selected based on demonstrated expertise in engineering services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS code 541330), a significant segment of the federal contracting market. This sector encompasses a wide range of professional services related to design, development, and application of engineering principles. Spending in this area is often driven by complex government missions requiring specialized technical expertise, such as those undertaken by the NNSA. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large engineering support contracts awarded by defense and energy agencies.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify any small business set-aside provisions (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct analysis of small business set-aside impact. However, large prime contracts often include subcontracting plans that may involve small businesses, though details are not provided here. The absence of a set-aside suggests the primary award was not targeted at small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers responsible for the NNSA. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being made under full and open competition, with details likely available through federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- NNSA Technical Support Services
- Department of Energy Engineering Contracts
- Federal Engineering Consulting Services
- National Defense Technical Support
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance issues if scope is not well-defined.
- Contractor personnel security and access to sensitive information.
- Risk of key personnel turnover impacting continuity.
- Ensuring alignment with evolving NNSA technical requirements.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-energy, national-nuclear-security-administration, technomics-inc, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, technical-support, federal-contract, defense-adjacent, district-of-columbia, delivery-order
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $19.7 million to TECHNOMICS INC. TEP III ORDER TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO THE NNSA.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TECHNOMICS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-12-05. End: 2026-06-01.
What is Technomics Inc.'s track record with the Department of Energy and similar agencies?
A comprehensive review of Technomics Inc.'s contract history with the Department of Energy (DOE) and other federal agencies is necessary to assess their track record. This would involve examining past performance evaluations, any documented disputes or contract terminations, and the types and values of previous contracts awarded to the company. Agencies often maintain performance assessment reporting systems (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) that provide insights into a contractor's reliability, technical competence, and management capabilities. Understanding their history with complex technical support or engineering services contracts, particularly those supporting national security missions, would be crucial for evaluating their suitability for this NNSA award.
How does the $19.7 million contract value compare to similar technical support contracts for nuclear security agencies?
Benchmarking the $19.7 million contract value against similar technical support contracts awarded to agencies like the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) requires access to detailed contract databases and market research. Factors such as contract duration (543 days), scope of services (technical support, engineering services), and specific technical requirements (e.g., nuclear weapons complex support) must be considered. Generally, contracts for specialized technical and engineering support for high-security government functions can range from several million to tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on complexity and duration. Without specific comparable contract data, it's difficult to definitively state if this value is high or low, but it appears within a plausible range for a multi-year, specialized support role.
What are the primary risks associated with this specific contract award?
Key risks for this contract include potential performance issues if Technomics Inc. fails to meet the technical requirements or deadlines, leading to delays in NNSA operations. There's also a risk of cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price contract doesn't adequately account for unforeseen complexities, although this risk is primarily borne by the contractor. A significant risk could be the potential for contractor personnel turnover, impacting institutional knowledge and continuity of support. Furthermore, ensuring the security and integrity of sensitive NNSA information handled by contractor personnel is paramount. Finally, the reliance on a single entity for critical technical support could pose a vulnerability if the contractor's capabilities degrade or if they face financial instability.
How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring program effectiveness for technical support?
The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in ensuring program effectiveness for technical support by incentivizing the contractor to manage costs efficiently and deliver services within the agreed budget. This structure shifts the financial risk of cost overruns to the contractor, encouraging them to optimize resource allocation and operational processes. For technical support, FFP can drive performance by clearly defining deliverables and milestones. However, its effectiveness hinges on a well-defined scope of work; if requirements are ambiguous or change frequently, it can lead to disputes or necessitate costly contract modifications. For complex technical services, an FFP contract requires meticulous upfront planning and specification to maximize its benefits.
What are the historical spending patterns for technical support services within the Department of Energy?
Historical spending patterns for technical support services within the Department of Energy (DOE) typically show significant and consistent investment, particularly in areas supporting its core missions like nuclear security, energy research, and environmental management. The DOE frequently utilizes various contract types, including cost-plus and fixed-price, to procure a wide range of services from engineering and scientific consulting to program management and operational support. Spending often fluctuates based on congressional appropriations, major project lifecycles, and national security priorities. Analyzing historical data would reveal trends in the volume and value of technical support contracts, the dominant contract vehicles used, and the key sectors or companies receiving these awards, providing context for current spending levels.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 201 12TH ST S STE 612, ARLINGTON, VA, 22202
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,814,678
Exercised Options: $23,814,678
Current Obligation: $19,706,273
Actual Outlays: $15,467,186
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00F103DA
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-12-05
Current End Date: 2026-06-01
Potential End Date: 2026-06-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-16
More Contracts from Technomics Inc
- Non-Personal Support Services in the Areas of Cyber Security, System Security, Information System and Data Engineering and Cost Engineering and Estimating Support Services for PEO IWS C, D, 1.0, 4.0, 8.0, 9.0 and 10.0 — $34.9M (Department of Defense)
- Technical Support to the Office of Fiscal Planning&analysis (na-Mb-90) — $23.0M (Department of Energy)
- Non-Personal Services to Support the Full Range of Cost Engineering and Estimating, and Data Analytical Support Services Necessary for Cradle-To-Grave Program Management of the PEO IWS for PEO IWS 2.0 and PEO IWS 3.0 — $10.9M (Department of Defense)
- Requisition 19MA002034 WAS Created to Provide Project Management Support to the Department of Energy. the Period of Performance IS: Base Year: 09/13/19 to 09/12/20 Option Year 1: 09/13/20 to 09/12/21 Option Year 2: 09/13/21 to 09/12/22 Option YEA — $7.9M (Department of Energy)
- Cost Data Collection Support Services for the Office of Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation (cepe) (NA-1.3) — $7.8M (Department of Energy)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)