DOE's Nevada Support Facility contract awarded to Chenega Reliable Services LLC for $2.64M
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,640,631 ($2.6M)
Contractor: Chenega Reliable Services LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2025-05-19
End Date: 2026-05-18
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.3K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: DOE/NNSA NEVADA SUPPORT FACILITY (NSF) OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES (OMSS) AT THE NEVADA FIELD OFFICE (NFO) IN LAS VEGAS, NV.
Place of Performance
Location: NORTH LAS VEGAS, CLARK County, NEVADA, 89030
State: Nevada Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $2.6 million to CHENEGA RELIABLE SERVICES LLC for work described as: DOE/NNSA NEVADA SUPPORT FACILITY (NSF) OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES (OMSS) AT THE NEVADA FIELD OFFICE (NFO) IN LAS VEGAS, NV. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for facilities support services. 2. Limited competition due to contract type raises questions about optimal pricing. 3. Performance risk is moderate, given the nature of facilities operations. 4. Contract duration is standard for this type of service. 5. Sector positioning is within government facilities management. 6. No small business set-aside noted, impacting subcontracting opportunities.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $2.64 million for one year of operations, maintenance, and support services at the Nevada Field Office appears to be within a reasonable range for facilities support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for large federal facilities would provide a more precise assessment, but the price per day is approximately $7,254, which seems competitive for comprehensive services. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government.
Cost Per Unit: $7,254 per day
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. The absence of a competitive bidding process means that the government did not explore multiple vendor options, which could potentially lead to higher prices than if the contract had been open to competition. The rationale for the sole-source award is not provided but is critical for understanding the procurement strategy.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may not have benefited from the cost savings that a competitive bidding process could have generated.
Public Impact
The Department of Energy's Nevada Field Office benefits from uninterrupted operations and maintenance. Essential support services are delivered to maintain critical government infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to Las Vegas, Nevada. The contract supports a workforce involved in facilities management and operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition may result in suboptimal pricing for taxpayers.
- Sole-source awards can reduce market pressure on contractors to innovate or improve efficiency.
- Transparency regarding the justification for the sole-source award is limited.
Positive Signals
- Chenega Reliable Services LLC is an established contractor, suggesting a degree of reliability.
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- The contract duration is for one year, allowing for future reassessment of competition.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the facilities support services sector, a critical component of government operations. This sector encompasses a wide range of services including maintenance, repair, security, and administrative support for federal buildings and installations. The market for these services is substantial, with numerous private sector firms competing for government contracts. The DOE's Nevada Field Office requires specialized support due to its unique operational needs.
Small Business Impact
The contract indicates that small business participation was not a primary consideration, as it is not a small business set-aside and the prime contractor is not identified as a small business. This suggests limited direct subcontracting opportunities for small businesses on this specific award. Future contracts for similar services should explore set-aside options to foster small business engagement.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract's performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is dependent on the agency's public disclosure policies regarding contract awards and performance. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Energy Facilities Operations
- Nevada Field Office Support Services
- Government Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Operations and Maintenance Services
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing pressure.
- Limited transparency on justification for sole-source award.
- No small business set-aside noted.
Tags
department-of-energy, facilities-support-services, nevada, las-vegas, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, operations-maintenance-support, federal-agency, support-services, chenega-reliable-services-llc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $2.6 million to CHENEGA RELIABLE SERVICES LLC. DOE/NNSA NEVADA SUPPORT FACILITY (NSF) OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES (OMSS) AT THE NEVADA FIELD OFFICE (NFO) IN LAS VEGAS, NV.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHENEGA RELIABLE SERVICES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-05-19. End: 2026-05-18.
What is the track record of Chenega Reliable Services LLC in performing similar federal contracts?
Chenega Reliable Services LLC has a history of performing various federal contracts, including those related to facilities support, logistics, and base operations. Their experience often spans multiple agencies, including defense and civilian departments. A detailed review of their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those involving operations, maintenance, and support services for federal facilities, would be necessary to fully assess their capability and reliability for this specific DOE contract. Past performance evaluations and any documented issues or successes would provide crucial context for understanding potential risks and ensuring successful contract execution.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar facilities support services?
The awarded price of approximately $7,254 per day for comprehensive facilities support services at the Nevada Field Office needs to be benchmarked against market rates for similar services in the Las Vegas, Nevada region and for federal installations of comparable size and complexity. Factors such as the scope of services (e.g., janitorial, HVAC, security, groundskeeping), the specific security requirements of the facility, and the labor costs in the area will influence market rates. Without specific market data or comparable federal contract awards, it is difficult to definitively state if the price is optimal. However, the firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
The primary risks associated with this contract include potential performance issues by the contractor, such as failure to meet service level agreements, and risks related to the sole-source nature of the award, which could lead to suboptimal pricing. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by the Department of Energy, clear performance metrics and reporting requirements, and regular communication with the contractor. For the pricing risk, the firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty, but future procurements should prioritize competition to ensure best value. The contractor's past performance and established presence also serve as a mitigating factor.
What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at the Nevada Field Office?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services at the Nevada Field Office is crucial for understanding the long-term cost trends and identifying any significant fluctuations. This would involve examining previous contracts for similar services, noting their values, durations, and the contractors involved. Understanding whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable over time can provide insights into the efficiency of service delivery, changes in operational needs, or shifts in market pricing. A consistent or escalating spending trend might warrant a deeper investigation into the necessity and cost-effectiveness of the services provided.
What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis is critical for understanding why competition was not pursued. Common reasons for sole-source awards include the urgency of the requirement, the unavailability of other sources, or specific technical capabilities possessed by only one contractor. Without this justification, it is difficult to assess whether the government acted prudently in foregoing a competitive process. Transparency regarding this rationale is essential for ensuring accountability and demonstrating that taxpayer funds are being used effectively and efficiently.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: 89233125QNA000390
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5253 PRUE RD STE 230, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78240
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,312,566
Exercised Options: $4,193,481
Current Obligation: $2,640,631
Actual Outlays: $1,477,246
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-05-19
Current End Date: 2026-05-18
Potential End Date: 2030-05-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-14
More Contracts from Chenega Reliable Services LLC
- Beale Refueler Parking LOT Repairs — $6.6M (Department of Defense)
- Snow Accumulation Event — $3.0M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Onsite Health Clinic Services — $2.9M (Department of Commerce)
- Medical Logicians and Supply Technicians — $2.8M (Department of Defense)
- Fence-To-Fence (F2F) Environmental Services (ES) Travis AIR Force Base (tafb) — $2.2M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)