DOE awards $49.2M for logistics support to Innovative Technology Partnerships LLC, with 1 delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $49,159,291 ($49.2M)

Contractor: Innovative Technology Partnerships LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 2020-02-17

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 2,325 days

Daily Burn Rate: $21.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES TO INCLUDE LOGISTICS PLANNING AND SUPPORT, PERSONAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, MUNITIONS MANAGEMENT, ARMORY OPERATIONS/FIREARMS MANAGEMENT, MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATIONS AND FLEET MANAGEMENT, AND ADMINISTRATION SUPPORT.

Place of Performance

Location: FORT SMITH, SEBASTIAN County, ARKANSAS, 72916

State: Arkansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $49.2 million to INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS LLC for work described as: LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES TO INCLUDE LOGISTICS PLANNING AND SUPPORT, PERSONAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, MUNITIONS MANAGEMENT, ARMORY OPERATIONS/FIREARMS MANAGEMENT, MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATIONS AND FLEET MANAGEMENT, AND ADMINISTRATION SUPPORT. Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in essential logistics operations. 2. The full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Delivery order structure indicates flexibility in tasking and potential for phased execution. 4. The contract duration spans over six years, suggesting a long-term need for these services. 5. Focus on diverse logistics functions points to a comprehensive support requirement. 6. The contract's geographic focus on Arkansas may indicate regional operational needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $49.2 million over approximately six years for comprehensive logistics support appears reasonable given the scope of services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale logistics contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Time and Materials pricing structure, while flexible, warrants careful monitoring to ensure costs remain aligned with the work performed and market rates.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service quality. The number of bidders was not specified, but the open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the potential for competitive pricing and a wider pool of qualified contractors vying for the work, which can drive down costs and improve service delivery.

Public Impact

The Department of Energy benefits from streamlined and efficient logistics operations. Services include critical functions like personal property management, munitions management, and fleet management. The contract supports operations primarily within Arkansas. Workforce implications include potential job creation for logistics specialists and administrative support personnel in the region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which encompasses a broad range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of facilities. The market for logistics support services is substantial, driven by government and commercial entities requiring efficient management of supply chains, inventory, and asset tracking. The $49.2 million award is a significant contract within this sub-sector, reflecting the complexity and scale of the Department of Energy's logistical needs.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates the awardee is not a small business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. This suggests that the primary focus of this contract is not on direct small business participation, though Innovative Technology Partnerships LLC may engage small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of this contract will likely be managed by the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated by the contract's public availability, but detailed operational oversight mechanisms are not specified in the provided data.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

logistics-support, facilities-support-services, department-of-energy, innovative-technology-partnerships-llc, delivery-order, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, arkansas, large-contract, government-contracting

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $49.2 million to INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS LLC. LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES TO INCLUDE LOGISTICS PLANNING AND SUPPORT, PERSONAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, MUNITIONS MANAGEMENT, ARMORY OPERATIONS/FIREARMS MANAGEMENT, MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATIONS AND FLEET MANAGEMENT, AND ADMINISTRATION SUPPORT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIPS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $49.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-02-17. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of Innovative Technology Partnerships LLC in performing similar logistics support services for federal agencies?

Assessing the track record of Innovative Technology Partnerships LLC requires a review of their past performance on similar federal contracts. This would involve examining contract databases for previous awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or contract terminations. A strong history of successful delivery on complex logistics contracts would indicate a lower performance risk for this new award. Conversely, any past issues with cost control, schedule adherence, or quality of service would raise concerns and necessitate closer monitoring by the Department of Energy.

How does the awarded value compare to similar logistics support contracts awarded by the Department of Energy or other agencies?

To benchmark the $49.2 million award, one would compare it to contracts for similar logistics support services, considering factors like contract duration, scope of work (e.g., types of property managed, operational tempo), and geographic location. For instance, contracts for base operations support at large federal installations or comprehensive supply chain management for agencies with significant physical assets could serve as comparators. If similar contracts of comparable scope and duration are valued significantly higher or lower, it would suggest potential overpricing or underestimation of the work required. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing also needs to be considered, as T&M contracts can vary widely in total cost based on actual labor hours and material usage.

What are the primary risks associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type for this scope of services?

The primary risk with a Time and Materials contract type for extensive logistics support is the potential for cost escalation if not rigorously managed. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the cost of materials. This structure can incentivize longer task durations or higher labor rates if oversight is insufficient. For the Department of Energy, risks include exceeding the contract ceiling prematurely, difficulty in accurately forecasting total expenditure, and the need for robust monitoring of labor hours, material costs, and contractor efficiency to ensure fair and reasonable pricing and prevent scope creep.

How effective are the current oversight mechanisms in place to ensure contractor performance and cost control for this contract?

The effectiveness of oversight mechanisms hinges on the Department of Energy's implementation of contract management best practices. Key elements include regular performance reviews, audits of labor hours and material charges, clear communication channels for issue resolution, and the utilization of performance metrics defined in the contract. The presence of a dedicated contract officer's representative (COR) or quality assurance personnel is crucial. Without specific details on the DOE's oversight plan for this contract, it's assumed they will employ standard government contract management procedures, including site visits, progress reports analysis, and potentially independent cost analyses to ensure the contractor meets performance standards and that costs remain within budgetary expectations.

What is the historical spending pattern for logistics support services within the Department of Energy, and how does this award fit?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for logistics support within the Department of Energy (DOE) would involve examining annual budget allocations and actual expenditures for similar services over the past several fiscal years. This includes looking at contracts awarded to various entities for functions like property management, supply chain, fleet operations, and facility support. This $49.2 million award, spread over approximately six years, represents a significant but potentially consistent level of investment if the DOE has historically relied on substantial contracts for these essential functions. Understanding past spending trends can help determine if this award is an increase, decrease, or continuation of previous investment levels and identify any shifts in contracting strategies or service providers.

What are the potential implications of this contract on the small business industrial base in Arkansas?

As this contract was awarded under full and open competition and the awardee is not a small business, the direct impact on the small business industrial base in Arkansas is likely limited unless significant subcontracting opportunities arise. The Department of Energy may have specific subcontracting goals outlined in the contract, which would necessitate the prime contractor, Innovative Technology Partnerships LLC, to engage small businesses for a portion of the work. The extent of this impact depends on the nature of the services required and the availability of qualified small businesses in Arkansas capable of fulfilling those subcontracting roles. Without explicit subcontracting requirements, the primary benefit to the small business ecosystem would be indirect, potentially through employment opportunities created by the prime contractor's operations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 89233119QNA000098

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6301 INDIAN SCHOOL RD NE STE 300, ALBUQUERQUE, NM, 87110

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $51,654,510

Exercised Options: $51,654,510

Current Obligation: $49,159,291

Actual Outlays: $36,119,069

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAA18D008Z

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-02-17

Current End Date: 2026-06-30

Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-07

More Contracts from Innovative Technology Partnerships LLC

View all Innovative Technology Partnerships LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending