NASA awards $2.39M contract for environmental consulting at Kennedy Space Center, Florida
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,387,369 ($2.4M)
Contractor: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2019-09-11
End Date: 2026-11-30
Contract Duration: 2,637 days
Daily Burn Rate: $905/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: GROUNDWATER INTERIM MEASURES AND MONITORING AT MOBILE LAUNCHER PLATFORM/VEHICLE ASSEMBLE AREA AT KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA
Place of Performance
Location: ORLANDO, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32899
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $2.4 million to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: GROUNDWATER INTERIM MEASURES AND MONITORING AT MOBILE LAUNCHER PLATFORM/VEHICLE ASSEMBLE AREA AT KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA Key points: 1. Contract focuses on groundwater interim measures and monitoring. 2. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. is the awarded contractor. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 4. Performance period spans from September 2019 to November 2026. 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price. 6. This award is a delivery order under a larger contract. 7. The geographic location is Florida.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $2.39 million for environmental consulting services over a period of approximately 7 years appears reasonable given the scope of work involving groundwater monitoring and interim measures at a major federal facility like Kennedy Space Center. Benchmarking against similar environmental consulting contracts for large-scale federal projects suggests that this pricing is competitive. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government, provided the scope is well-defined.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and value for the government. This approach ensures that the most capable and cost-effective solution is selected.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process for this contract helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs and encourages innovation from multiple providers.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are NASA and its operations at Kennedy Space Center, ensuring environmental compliance and operational continuity. Services delivered include critical environmental consulting for groundwater management and monitoring. The geographic impact is localized to Kennedy Space Center, Florida. The contract supports specialized environmental consulting roles, potentially impacting the local environmental services workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if environmental conditions are more complex than initially assessed.
- Reliance on a single delivery order under a potentially larger IDIQ contract could limit flexibility if needs change significantly.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
- Long performance period allows for sustained environmental monitoring and management.
Sector Analysis
Environmental consulting services represent a significant sector within professional services, supporting government agencies in meeting regulatory requirements and managing environmental impacts. This contract fits within the broader category of environmental remediation and monitoring services, often required for large federal installations. Comparable spending benchmarks for environmental consulting at major federal sites can vary widely based on complexity, but this award appears to be within a typical range for specialized groundwater services.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific award is likely minimal unless AECOM Technical Services, Inc. voluntarily includes small business subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within NASA at Kennedy Space Center. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract structure, requiring AECOM to deliver specified services within budget. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Environmental Consulting Services
- Groundwater Monitoring Contracts
- Federal Facility Environmental Management
Risk Flags
- Potential for environmental condition complexity impacting scope.
- Long performance period may introduce evolving regulatory risks.
Tags
environmental-consulting, nasa, kennedy-space-center, florida, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, groundwater-monitoring, environmental-services, federal-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $2.4 million to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.. GROUNDWATER INTERIM MEASURES AND MONITORING AT MOBILE LAUNCHER PLATFORM/VEHICLE ASSEMBLE AREA AT KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-09-11. End: 2026-11-30.
What is the track record of AECOM Technical Services, Inc. in performing similar environmental consulting contracts for federal agencies?
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. has a substantial track record of performing environmental consulting and remediation services for various federal agencies, including NASA, the Department of Defense, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Their experience often encompasses large-scale projects involving site assessment, groundwater monitoring, remediation design, and implementation, similar to the scope outlined for the Kennedy Space Center contract. Publicly available contract databases often show numerous awards to AECOM for environmental services, indicating a strong presence and capability in this sector. While specific performance details for individual contracts are not always public, their consistent awards suggest a generally positive performance history and ability to meet federal requirements.
How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated cost or budget for this type of environmental consulting service?
Without access to NASA's internal cost estimates or budget allocations for this specific requirement, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the awarded amount of $2.39 million for approximately seven years of groundwater interim measures and monitoring at a complex site like Kennedy Space Center suggests a competitive procurement process. Industry benchmarks for environmental consulting services can vary significantly based on the complexity of the site, regulatory requirements, and the specific services required. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, the award indicates that AECOM's proposed price was deemed fair and reasonable by NASA, likely falling within or below their anticipated budget range for these essential environmental services.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks for this contract include potential unforeseen environmental conditions at Kennedy Space Center that could increase the scope or complexity of groundwater monitoring and interim measures, leading to cost overruns if not managed effectively. Another risk is the long performance period, which could see changes in regulatory requirements or technology. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract management by NASA, clear definition of interim measures, and performance standards within the contract. The firm-fixed-price structure incentivizes AECOM to manage costs and risks proactively. Regular progress reviews and reporting mechanisms would also be in place to identify and address issues early.
How effective has AECOM been in delivering environmental services on previous NASA contracts?
Assessing the specific effectiveness of AECOM on previous NASA contracts requires detailed performance reviews, which are often not publicly disclosed. However, AECOM's continued success in securing contracts with NASA and other federal agencies suggests a generally satisfactory level of performance. Their ability to win competitive bids and fulfill contract obligations over extended periods indicates competence and reliability. For this particular contract, effectiveness will be measured against the defined scope of work, including the successful implementation of interim measures and the accuracy and timeliness of groundwater monitoring data provided to NASA.
What are the historical spending patterns for environmental consulting services at Kennedy Space Center?
Historical spending on environmental consulting services at Kennedy Space Center has likely been substantial, given the site's long history of space launch activities and associated environmental management needs. NASA consistently invests in environmental compliance, remediation, and monitoring across its facilities. While specific figures for KSC's environmental consulting spend over time are not provided in this data, it's reasonable to assume a consistent allocation of resources for these critical functions. This $2.39 million award represents a portion of that ongoing investment, focused on specific groundwater management needs during the contract period.
What is the significance of the 'delivery order' award type in this context?
The 'delivery order' award type signifies that this contract is likely a task order issued under a larger, pre-existing indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar master agreement. This approach allows agencies to procure services efficiently by having pre-negotiated terms, conditions, and pricing established. For NASA, it means they can issue specific orders for defined work, like this groundwater project, without needing to conduct a full, separate procurement each time. It provides flexibility and speed for acquiring necessary services as needs arise, while still maintaining a competitive framework if the IDIQ itself was competed.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 300 S GRAND AVE STE 1100, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90071
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,387,369
Exercised Options: $2,387,369
Current Obligation: $2,387,369
Actual Outlays: $2,284,631
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 6
Total Subaward Amount: $465,922
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC019D0010
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-09-11
Current End Date: 2026-11-30
Potential End Date: 2026-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-20
More Contracts from AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
- DB Repair Berths 40 and 41, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, VA — $229.7M (Department of Defense)
- L-536 Interim/Final Levee Repairs — $121.5M (Department of Defense)
- Alternate Care Facility (ACF): Suny OLD Westbury - OLD Westbury, NY — $121.4M (Department of Defense)
- Fwda Parcel 3 Closure&corrective Action, Fort Wingate Depot Activity, Mckinley County, NEW Mexico — $107.1M (Department of Defense)
- Typhoon Mawar Recovery AT Various Locations in Joint Region Maria — $101.4M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →