Yulista Tactical Services LLC awarded $96.6M for aircraft logistics and maintenance by NASA
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $96,643,226 ($96.6M)
Contractor: Yulista Tactical Services LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2018-03-01
End Date: 2023-02-28
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $53.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: AIRCRAFT LOGISTICS AND MAINTENANCE
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35806
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $96.6 million to YULISTA TACTICAL SERVICES LLC for work described as: AIRCRAFT LOGISTICS AND MAINTENANCE Key points: 1. Contract value of $96.6 million over five years indicates significant investment in aviation support. 2. The contract type (Cost Plus Award Fee) suggests performance incentives are tied to mission success. 3. Awarded by NASA, this contract likely supports critical aerospace operations and research. 4. The duration of 1825 days (5 years) points to a long-term need for these services. 5. The contract's focus on logistics and maintenance is crucial for fleet readiness and operational efficiency.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total award of $96.6 million over five years for aircraft logistics and maintenance appears reasonable given the scope of services typically required by an agency like NASA. Benchmarking against similar large-scale aviation support contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Cost Plus Award Fee structure allows for flexibility and incentivizes performance, which can lead to better outcomes than fixed-price contracts in complex environments. However, without detailed breakdowns of labor rates, material costs, and specific award fee criteria, a definitive assessment of cost-effectiveness is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' which suggests that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded. This could be due to specific technical requirements, past performance, or other pre-qualification criteria. The number of bidders is not explicitly stated, but the 'limited' competition level might imply fewer than a full and open competition, potentially impacting price discovery. Further details on the exclusion rationale would clarify the extent of competition.
Taxpayer Impact: A limited competition may result in higher prices for taxpayers compared to a broad, unrestricted competition, as it narrows the pool of potential offerors. This can reduce the pressure on contractors to offer the most competitive pricing.
Public Impact
This contract directly benefits NASA by ensuring the operational readiness and maintenance of its aircraft fleet, supporting its diverse missions in space exploration and aeronautics research. The services delivered include comprehensive logistics and maintenance, crucial for the safety and efficiency of flight operations. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around NASA facilities where aircraft are based and maintained, potentially including Alabama where the contractor is registered. Workforce implications include the creation or sustainment of skilled jobs in aviation maintenance, logistics, and related technical fields.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The 'limited' competition aspect raises concerns about whether the most competitive pricing was achieved for the taxpayer.
- The Cost Plus Award Fee structure, while incentivizing, can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed rigorously.
- Lack of detailed public information on the specific services and performance metrics makes it difficult to fully assess value for money.
Positive Signals
- The significant contract value suggests a high level of trust and confidence in Yulista Tactical Services LLC's capabilities.
- The long-term nature of the contract (5 years) indicates a stable and ongoing need for these critical services, providing continuity for NASA's operations.
- Awarding to a single entity for comprehensive logistics and maintenance can streamline operations and ensure accountability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the aerospace and defense services sector, specifically focusing on aviation logistics and maintenance. This is a critical segment supporting government and commercial aviation fleets. The market for such services is substantial, driven by the need to maintain aging aircraft, ensure operational readiness, and support complex technological advancements. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large government contracts for similar aviation support services across agencies like the Department of Defense and FAA.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false, and there is no indication of a small business set-aside (ss). This suggests the contract was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. Consequently, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside provision. The impact on the small business ecosystem would be indirect, potentially through competition with larger firms that may engage small businesses as lower-tier subcontractors, but this is not a primary focus of this award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Accountability measures are embedded within the Cost Plus Award Fee structure, which links contractor compensation to performance outcomes. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. NASA's Office of Inspector General (OIG) would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Aviation Support Services
- Aerospace Logistics Contracts
- Aircraft Maintenance Services
- Government Aviation Fleet Management
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may impact price competitiveness.
- Cost Plus Award Fee contracts require diligent oversight to manage costs effectively.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical logistics and maintenance poses a risk.
Tags
nasa, aircraft-logistics, aircraft-maintenance, yulista-tactical-services-llc, cost-plus-award-fee, limited-competition, alabama, federal-contract, aerospace, aviation-support, delivery-order
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $96.6 million to YULISTA TACTICAL SERVICES LLC. AIRCRAFT LOGISTICS AND MAINTENANCE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is YULISTA TACTICAL SERVICES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $96.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-03-01. End: 2023-02-28.
What is the historical spending pattern for aircraft logistics and maintenance by NASA?
Analyzing NASA's historical spending on aircraft logistics and maintenance reveals a consistent and significant investment in these areas. Over the past decade, NASA has allocated substantial funds to ensure the operational readiness of its diverse aviation assets, which support critical research, flight testing, and operational missions. Spending fluctuates based on fleet modernization needs, specific program requirements, and the lifecycle of aircraft assets. Contracts in this domain often span multiple years and involve complex service requirements, leading to multi-million dollar awards. While specific year-over-year figures require detailed database queries, the overall trend indicates a sustained commitment to maintaining a high-performance aviation capability, essential for fulfilling NASA's scientific and exploratory objectives.
How does the performance of Yulista Tactical Services LLC on similar contracts compare?
Assessing Yulista Tactical Services LLC's performance on similar contracts requires access to detailed performance evaluations and past performance data, which are often not publicly available in full detail. However, the award of a significant contract like this by NASA suggests a positive assessment of the contractor's capabilities and track record. Agencies typically conduct thorough past performance reviews before awarding large contracts, considering factors such as on-time delivery, quality of service, cost control, and adherence to contract requirements. Without specific performance metrics from prior engagements, it's difficult to provide a granular comparison. Generally, contractors with a history of successful, large-scale aviation support contracts are favored for such awards.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how are they measured?
The key performance indicators (KPIs) for this Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract are not publicly detailed but would typically revolve around ensuring aircraft availability, mission readiness, maintenance turnaround times, safety compliance, and cost efficiency. For a CPAF contract, NASA would establish specific performance standards and metrics. The 'award fee' component means that Yulista Tactical Services LLC's compensation is directly tied to exceeding these performance expectations. NASA would likely have a formal process for evaluating performance against these KPIs, potentially involving regular reviews, audits, and data reporting from the contractor. Successful achievement of these KPIs would result in higher award fees, while failure to meet them could reduce the contractor's overall earnings.
What is the risk assessment associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
The primary risks associated with this aircraft logistics and maintenance contract include potential cost overruns due to the CPAF structure, performance failures leading to mission delays or safety incidents, and contractor viability issues. Mitigation strategies are inherent in the contract type and oversight. The CPAF structure incentivizes performance, and NASA's oversight would involve continuous monitoring of costs and performance against KPIs. Risk mitigation also involves rigorous contractor vetting during the procurement process, including past performance reviews. Furthermore, NASA likely has contingency plans and alternative support arrangements in place to address potential disruptions. The 'limited' competition aspect could also be seen as a risk if it leads to suboptimal pricing, which NASA would aim to mitigate through negotiation and performance incentives.
How does this contract align with NASA's overall strategic goals for its aviation assets?
This contract directly aligns with NASA's strategic goals by ensuring the reliable operation and maintenance of its aviation assets. These assets are crucial for supporting a wide range of NASA activities, from aeronautical research and flight testing to supporting space mission operations (e.g., transporting personnel and equipment). By outsourcing logistics and maintenance to a specialized contractor like Yulista Tactical Services LLC, NASA can focus its internal resources on core scientific and engineering endeavors. The contract's emphasis on performance through the CPAF structure further supports NASA's goal of achieving mission success efficiently and effectively, ensuring that its aviation capabilities remain state-of-the-art and fully mission-capable.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Support Activities for Air Transportation › Other Support Activities for Air Transportation
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 8600 ADVANCED GTWY SW, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35808
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $106,072,841
Exercised Options: $106,072,841
Current Obligation: $96,643,226
Actual Outlays: $79,947,450
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80JSC018D0002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-03-01
Current End Date: 2023-02-28
Potential End Date: 2023-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-16
More Contracts from Yulista Tactical Services LLC
- Aircraft Logistics and Maintenance — $115.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →