NASA awards $883K contract for environmental support at Ames Research Center
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $882,950 ($883.0K)
Contractor: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2025-12-17
End Date: 2026-12-15
Contract Duration: 363 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THIS CONTRACT PROVIDES DIRECT TECHNICAL AND FIELD SUPPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION (EMD) AT NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER (ARC) STAFF TO CARRY OUT ENVIRONMENTAL OBLIGATIONS ACROSS ARC'S 2,000-ACRE FACILITY.
Place of Performance
Location: MOFFETT FIELD, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94035
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $882,950.13 to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: THIS CONTRACT PROVIDES DIRECT TECHNICAL AND FIELD SUPPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION (EMD) AT NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER (ARC) STAFF TO CARRY OUT ENVIRONMENTAL OBLIGATIONS ACROSS ARC'S 2,000-ACRE FACILITY. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential environmental obligations across a 2,000-acre facility. 2. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. secured the award. 3. The contract is a BPA Call under a Firm Fixed Price structure. 4. Performance period extends through December 2026. 5. This award represents a small portion of overall federal environmental services spending. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $882,950.13 for two years of environmental support appears reasonable given the scope of work at NASA Ames Research Center's 2,000-acre facility. Benchmarking against similar environmental services contracts for federal agencies of comparable size and complexity would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests a degree of cost certainty for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 5 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this type of specialized environmental support service. This competitive process is expected to drive fair pricing and encourage innovative solutions.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that typically leads to better pricing and service quality.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA Ames Research Center by ensuring compliance with environmental regulations. Provides direct technical and field support for environmental management. Impacts the 2,000-acre facility at NASA Ames Research Center. Supports the operational continuity of NASA's research and development activities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if environmental obligations expand beyond initial estimates.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical environmental compliance tasks.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Long-standing relationship with AECOM may indicate reliable performance.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), a broad category encompassing a wide range of professional services. Federal spending in this sector is substantial, supporting various agencies with technical expertise for infrastructure, research, and operational needs. This specific award is a component of NASA's broader environmental management strategy, ensuring compliance and sustainability at its research facilities.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal, with the primary benefit accruing to the prime contractor, AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by NASA's Environmental Management Division (EMD) at Ames Research Center, who are the direct recipients of the support. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through federal contract databases, and any specific Inspector General involvement would depend on audit findings or reported issues.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Environmental Management Programs
- Federal Environmental Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Environmental Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for environmental incidents impacting facility operations or surrounding areas.
- Contractor performance may affect NASA's compliance with environmental regulations.
Tags
engineering-services, nasa, california, bpa-call, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, environmental-management, research-and-development, federal-agency, technical-support
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $882,950.13 to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.. THIS CONTRACT PROVIDES DIRECT TECHNICAL AND FIELD SUPPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION (EMD) AT NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER (ARC) STAFF TO CARRY OUT ENVIRONMENTAL OBLIGATIONS ACROSS ARC'S 2,000-ACRE FACILITY.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $882,950.13.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-12-17. End: 2026-12-15.
What is AECOM Technical Services, Inc.'s track record with NASA and similar federal agencies for environmental services?
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. has a significant history of performing environmental services for various federal agencies, including NASA. Their past performance often includes large-scale environmental remediation, compliance support, and hazardous waste management. Analyzing their contract history with NASA Ames Research Center specifically would reveal their success in delivering similar services within the specified facility's unique operational context. A review of past performance evaluations and any reported disputes or contract terminations would provide further insight into their reliability and capability in fulfilling environmental obligations.
How does the $883K contract value compare to similar environmental support contracts awarded by NASA or other federal agencies?
The $882,950.13 contract value for two years of environmental support at NASA Ames Research Center is a moderate-sized award within the federal environmental services landscape. Comparable contracts can vary widely based on the size of the facility, the complexity of environmental challenges (e.g., hazardous materials, remediation needs), and the duration of the support. For instance, larger installations or those with extensive remediation requirements might see contracts in the tens or hundreds of millions. However, for direct technical and field support focused on ongoing obligations at a research center, this value appears aligned with industry benchmarks for similar scope and duration, especially considering it was competitively bid.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?
Primary risks include potential scope creep if unforeseen environmental issues arise, leading to cost overruns despite the firm fixed-price structure, and contractor performance issues impacting NASA's ability to meet its environmental obligations. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract management by NASA's EMD, clear definition of tasks and deliverables, regular performance reviews, and contingency planning for environmental emergencies. The competitive award process also mitigates risk by selecting a contractor with a demonstrated capability. The relatively short duration (two years) also limits long-term exposure to performance risks.
How effective is the current environmental management approach at NASA Ames Research Center, and how does this contract contribute?
This contract directly contributes to the effectiveness of NASA Ames Research Center's Environmental Management Division (EMD) by providing essential technical and field support. The EMD's effectiveness is measured by its ability to ensure regulatory compliance, manage environmental risks, and promote sustainability across the facility. By outsourcing direct support functions to a specialized contractor like AECOM, NASA can leverage external expertise and resources to maintain a high standard of environmental stewardship. The success of this contract hinges on AECOM's ability to execute its tasks efficiently and effectively, thereby bolstering the EMD's overall performance in meeting its environmental obligations.
What are the historical spending patterns for environmental services at NASA Ames Research Center or similar NASA facilities?
Historical spending on environmental services at NASA Ames Research Center and similar NASA facilities typically reflects a consistent need for compliance, maintenance, and potential remediation activities. Annual expenditures can fluctuate based on specific projects, regulatory changes, and the lifecycle of research infrastructure. Analyzing past contracts for environmental support, hazardous waste management, and environmental consulting at ARC would reveal trends in spending levels, contractor choices, and the types of services most frequently procured. This $883K award represents a specific allocation for direct technical and field support, and its context within broader historical spending would indicate whether this is a routine operational expense or a response to a particular initiative.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 300 S GRAND AVE FL 9, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90071
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $9,483,953
Exercised Options: $1,722,025
Current Obligation: $882,950
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 1
Total Subaward Amount: $45,351
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80KSC025A0001
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-12-17
Current End Date: 2026-12-15
Potential End Date: 2030-12-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-03
More Contracts from AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
- DB Repair Berths 40 and 41, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, VA — $229.7M (Department of Defense)
- L-536 Interim/Final Levee Repairs — $121.5M (Department of Defense)
- Alternate Care Facility (ACF): Suny OLD Westbury - OLD Westbury, NY — $121.4M (Department of Defense)
- Fwda Parcel 3 Closure&corrective Action, Fort Wingate Depot Activity, Mckinley County, NEW Mexico — $107.1M (Department of Defense)
- Typhoon Mawar Recovery AT Various Locations in Joint Region Maria — $101.4M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →