HHS awards $3.9M for consulting services to Kiliuda Consulting, LLC under a BPA call

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,900,591 ($3.9M)

Contractor: Kiliuda Consulting, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2025-09-22

End Date: 2026-09-21

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.7K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 33 QUALIFIED CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL TO PERFORM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS STATEMENT OF WORK.

Place of Performance

Location: ANCHORAGE, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99503

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $3.9 million to KILIUDA CONSULTING, LLC for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 33 QUALIFIED CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL TO PERFORM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS STATEMENT OF WORK. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures). 3. Performance period is one year, with an estimated value of $3.9 million. 4. The contractor will provide 33 qualified personnel. 5. The contract is a labor hours type. 6. The award was made to Kiliuda Consulting, LLC. 7. The contract is managed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.9 million for 33 personnel over one year suggests a per-person cost of approximately $118,199 annually. This rate appears to be within a reasonable range for consulting services, though specific skill sets and experience levels would influence the exact valuation. Benchmarking against similar administrative and management consulting contracts would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The contract type (labor hours) allows for flexibility but requires careful monitoring to ensure efficient resource utilization.

Cost Per Unit: Approximately $118,199 per person per year (based on total contract value and personnel count).

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), indicating a competitive process within the simplified acquisition threshold. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP generally allows for a reasonable number of offers, promoting price discovery. The use of SAP suggests the agency sought competitive bids while streamlining the acquisition process for a contract of this size.

Taxpayer Impact: Competing under SAP likely resulted in a more efficient acquisition process and potentially competitive pricing for taxpayers, compared to a full and open competition for a larger contract value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which will receive administrative management and general management consulting services. The services delivered will support the operational efficiency and management functions of the NIH. The geographic impact is primarily within the agency's operational locations, likely supporting federal employees and research initiatives. The contract will impact the workforce by providing 33 qualified contractor personnel to augment federal staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if labor hours are not managed efficiently.
Ensuring the 33 personnel provided meet the required qualifications and experience levels throughout the contract term.
The reliance on contractor personnel for critical management functions could pose continuity risks if not properly managed.

Positive Signals

The contract was competed, suggesting a degree of market vetting and potential for competitive pricing.
The award to Kiliuda Consulting, LLC indicates they met the agency's requirements and were selected through a competitive process.
The clear definition of 33 personnel required provides a defined scope for resource allocation.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This is a broad category encompassing a wide range of services supporting government operations. Spending in this sector is substantial across federal agencies, with consulting services often used to improve efficiency, implement new policies, or provide specialized expertise. Benchmarks for similar consulting services vary widely based on the specific expertise required.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on the small business ecosystem would be through potential subcontracting opportunities, if Kiliuda Consulting, LLC chooses to engage small businesses. Without specific subcontracting plans or goals outlined, the direct benefit to small businesses from this particular award is uncertain.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance work statement and deliverables. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics and specific oversight activities are not publicly detailed in this summary. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) Contracts
GSA Schedule Contracts
Department of Health and Human Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost creep due to labor hour contract type.
Ensuring consistent quality and qualifications of 33 personnel over the contract term.
Reliance on contractor personnel for management functions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $3.9 million to KILIUDA CONSULTING, LLC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 33 QUALIFIED CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL TO PERFORM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS STATEMENT OF WORK.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KILIUDA CONSULTING, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (National Institutes of Health).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-22. End: 2026-09-21.

What is the track record of Kiliuda Consulting, LLC in performing similar government contracts?

Information regarding Kiliuda Consulting, LLC's specific track record on similar government contracts is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their performance history, one would typically review past performance evaluations, contract awards, and any reported issues or successes on previous federal engagements. A thorough review would involve searching federal procurement databases like SAM.gov and FPDS for their contract history, looking for awards of similar size, scope, and complexity, particularly within the administrative and management consulting domain. Understanding their past performance is crucial for evaluating their capability to successfully execute this current contract and manage the 33 personnel effectively.

How does the per-person cost benchmark against similar consulting contracts within HHS or NIH?

The estimated annual cost per person of approximately $118,199 for consulting services at NIH requires comparison with similar contracts to establish a robust benchmark. Factors such as the specific expertise required (e.g., policy analysis, IT management consulting, financial advisory), the seniority of the personnel, and the geographic location of service delivery significantly influence per-person costs. While this figure appears within a plausible range for skilled consultants, a detailed analysis would involve comparing it to contracts for comparable services awarded by HHS or NIH, ideally those competed under similar conditions and with similar labor hour structures. Without access to detailed pricing data from comparable contracts, it is difficult to definitively assess whether this represents excellent, fair, or questionable value for money.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential cost overruns due to inefficient labor hour utilization, challenges in ensuring the consistent qualification and experience of the 33 contractor personnel throughout the performance period, and continuity risks if critical management functions become overly reliant on contractor staff. Mitigation strategies would typically involve robust contract oversight by NIH program managers, including regular performance reviews, detailed tracking of labor hours against milestones, and clear performance standards in the Statement of Work. The agency should also have contingency plans for personnel turnover and ensure knowledge transfer mechanisms are in place. The competitive nature of the award under SAP may also mitigate some risks by selecting a contractor with a demonstrated ability to meet requirements.

What is the historical spending pattern for administrative management and general management consulting services at NIH?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for administrative management and general management consulting services at NIH is essential for contextualizing this $3.9 million award. This would involve examining NIH's procurement data over several fiscal years to identify trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the contractors frequently engaged. Understanding whether this award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending in this category provides insight into NIH's strategic priorities and resource allocation. It also helps in identifying if there are recurring needs for such services or if this is a one-time requirement. Benchmarking this contract's value against the historical average for similar services at NIH can further inform the assessment of its value and necessity.

How does the use of a BPA Call under SAP affect competition and pricing for these services?

Using a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) for this contract suggests a streamlined approach to obtaining services that are likely anticipated or recurring. SAP itself is designed for acquisitions below the full and open competition threshold, allowing for more efficient procurement processes. A BPA Call leverages an existing agreement, potentially reducing the time and effort needed to solicit and award. While SAP allows for competition, it may not reach the same breadth as full and open competition. The number of bidders and the specific terms of the underlying BPA would determine the extent of price discovery. For taxpayers, this method aims to balance efficiency and cost-effectiveness, assuming the BPA was established with competitive pricing and the call-off process continues to foster competitive offers within the SAP framework.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Kiliuda Consulting

Address: 2702 DENALI ST STE 100, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,900,591

Exercised Options: $3,900,591

Current Obligation: $3,900,591

Actual Outlays: $518,017

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 75N91022A00001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline