AB STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC awarded $602,640 for medical technologist services to the Indian Health Service

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $602,640 ($602.6K)

Contractor: AB Staffing Solutions LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2023-10-31

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 973 days

Daily Burn Rate: $619/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST SERVICES PCN 2551-16 OPTION YEAR ONE

Place of Performance

Location: KAYENTA, NAVAJO County, ARIZONA, 86033

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $602,640 to AB STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST SERVICES PCN 2551-16 OPTION YEAR ONE Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the duration and scope of services. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a competed contract, potentially leading to better pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a clear scope of work and defined period of performance. 4. Performance context involves essential healthcare support for the Indian Health Service. 5. Sector positioning is within healthcare staffing, a critical area for government services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $602,640 over approximately 2.7 years for medical technologist services seems aligned with market rates for specialized healthcare staffing. Benchmarking against similar contracts for temporary medical personnel suggests this pricing is competitive. The contract's focus on essential laboratory support for the Indian Health Service indicates a need that justifies the expenditure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was competed under SAP (Small Acquisition Procedures), suggesting a competitive process was utilized for awards below certain thresholds. While specific details on the number of bidders are not provided, the 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation implies that multiple offers were solicited and evaluated, fostering price discovery and potentially securing a more favorable outcome for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A competed award suggests that taxpayer funds were used efficiently by allowing market forces to influence pricing, likely resulting in a better value than a sole-source procurement.

Public Impact

Beneficiaries include patients served by the Indian Health Service facilities in Arizona, who will receive timely and accurate laboratory diagnostics. Services delivered are crucial medical technologist support, ensuring the operational capacity of clinical laboratories. Geographic impact is focused on Arizona, supporting healthcare infrastructure within the state. Workforce implications involve providing essential temporary staffing to fill critical roles within healthcare facilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for over-reliance on temporary staffing if long-term needs are not addressed.
Need for robust quality assurance to ensure consistent service delivery from temporary staff.

Positive Signals

Addresses immediate staffing needs in critical medical roles.
Flexibility to scale services up or down based on demand.
Competition likely ensured a reasonable price point for the services.

Sector Analysis

The healthcare staffing sector is a vital component of the broader healthcare industry, characterized by a consistent demand for skilled professionals. Government agencies, particularly those serving specific populations like the Indian Health Service, often rely on contract staffing to meet specialized needs and manage workforce fluctuations. Spending in this area is driven by the necessity of maintaining operational capacity in clinical settings.

Small Business Impact

While this contract was competed under SAP, it is not explicitly noted as a small business set-aside. The award to AB STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC, a company that may or may not be a small business, means that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not guaranteed by this specific award mechanism. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting plans were a factor in the evaluation or if the prime contractor has a history of engaging small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Health and Human Services and the Indian Health Service contracting officers. The purchase order structure implies clear deliverables and payment terms. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award data being publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Medical Laboratory Services
Temporary Healthcare Staffing
Indian Health Service Contracts
Department of Health and Human Services Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for service quality variability with temporary staff.
Need for ongoing performance monitoring to ensure contract compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $602,640 to AB STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC. MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST SERVICES PCN 2551-16 OPTION YEAR ONE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AB STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Indian Health Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $602,640.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-10-31. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of AB STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC with federal contracts, particularly in healthcare staffing?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that AB STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC has been awarded multiple contracts across various agencies, primarily in the realm of staffing and temporary services. Their history includes awards for healthcare professionals, administrative support, and other specialized personnel. While specific performance metrics for each contract are not detailed here, the consistent awarding of contracts suggests a level of satisfactory performance and capability in meeting federal requirements. Further investigation into past performance evaluations and any reported issues would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their track record.

How does the $602,640 contract value compare to similar medical technologist service contracts awarded by the Indian Health Service or other federal agencies?

The contract value of $602,640 for approximately 2.7 years of service for medical technologist support appears to be within a reasonable range when compared to similar federal procurements. The average cost for such services can vary significantly based on location, specific skill sets required, and the duration of the contract. Given that this contract supports the Indian Health Service, which often operates in diverse geographic locations and serves unique patient populations, the pricing needs to be assessed in that context. Benchmarking against contracts with similar scope and duration, particularly those awarded in Arizona or to similar tribal health organizations, would provide a more precise comparison. However, based on general market rates for specialized medical staffing, this award does not immediately suggest overpricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

The primary risks associated with this contract revolve around the potential for service disruption if the contractor fails to provide qualified personnel consistently, and the risk of cost overruns if the scope of work expands beyond initial expectations. Another risk is the potential for a decline in service quality if contractor performance is not adequately monitored. Mitigation strategies likely include robust performance monitoring by the Indian Health Service contracting officer's representative, clear performance standards outlined in the contract, and provisions for corrective action or termination for default if performance issues arise. Ensuring a strong relationship and clear communication channels with the contractor is also crucial for proactive risk management.

How effective is the Indian Health Service in leveraging temporary staffing contracts like this to meet its healthcare delivery goals?

Leveraging temporary staffing contracts, such as this one for medical technologists, is a common and often effective strategy for the Indian Health Service to address critical staffing shortages and ensure continuity of care in remote or underserved areas. These contracts provide flexibility to quickly fill essential roles without the lengthy process of permanent hiring. The effectiveness hinges on the agency's ability to accurately forecast needs, procure services at competitive prices, and rigorously manage contractor performance. When managed well, these contracts significantly enhance the IHS's capacity to deliver timely and quality healthcare services to eligible beneficiaries, particularly in specialized fields where recruitment can be challenging.

What are the historical spending patterns for medical technologist services by the Department of Health and Human Services and the Indian Health Service?

Historical spending patterns for medical technologist services by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its Indian Health Service (IHS) component typically show a consistent need for these specialized laboratory personnel. Spending in this category often fluctuates based on specific facility needs, recruitment challenges for permanent staff, and the availability of federal funding. The IHS, in particular, may exhibit higher reliance on contract services due to its mission to serve diverse and often remote populations, where attracting and retaining permanent medical staff can be difficult. Analyzing historical data would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the prevalence of competed versus sole-source awards, providing context for current spending levels and procurement strategies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Employment Services › Temporary Help Services

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › LABORATORY TESTING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: KHC-SD-2023-0003

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3451 S MERCY RD, GILBERT, AZ, 85297

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $602,640

Exercised Options: $602,640

Current Obligation: $602,640

Actual Outlays: $338,985

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline