Cadmus Group LLC awarded $19.5M for environmental and social safeguarding technical assistance by USAID

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,465,496 ($19.5M)

Contractor: THE Cadmus Group LLC

Awarding Agency: Agency for International Development

Start Date: 2023-08-23

End Date: 2025-03-12

Contract Duration: 567 days

Daily Burn Rate: $34.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDING AWARD IS TO PROVIDE OUS AND MISSIONS WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, TRAINING SUPPORT AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TO PERFORM THE AGENCY'S THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANDATE

Place of Performance

Location: WALTHAM, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02451

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Agency for International Development obligated $19.5 million to THE CADMUS GROUP LLC for work described as: THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDING AWARD IS TO PROVIDE OUS AND MISSIONS WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, TRAINING SUPPORT AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TO PERFORM THE AGENCY'S THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANDATE Key points: 1. Contract provides critical technical assistance for USAID's environmental and social mandate. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust market for these specialized services. 3. Potential for long-term impact on agency's environmental and social performance. 4. Contract duration of over 1.5 years indicates a significant scope of work. 5. Focus on knowledge management and training points to capacity building efforts.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $19.5 million for environmental and social safeguarding technical assistance appears reasonable given the scope and duration. While direct comparisons are difficult without more specific service details, similar large-scale technical assistance contracts for federal agencies often fall within this range. The time and materials pricing structure allows for flexibility but requires diligent oversight to ensure cost-effectiveness. Benchmarking against industry standards for environmental consulting services would provide further insight into value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters competitive pricing and encourages a wider range of innovative solutions. The agency's decision to use full and open competition suggests confidence in the market's ability to meet its needs effectively.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and better value for the services rendered, maximizing the impact of federal funds.

Public Impact

Beneficiaries include USAID missions and personnel requiring environmental and social safeguarding expertise. Services delivered encompass technical assistance, training, and knowledge management. Geographic impact is global, supporting USAID's international development projects. Workforce implications include enhanced capacity for agency staff in environmental and social compliance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The environmental consulting services sector is a significant part of the professional services industry, supporting government and private sector compliance with environmental regulations. This contract falls within the broader category of management and technical consulting, with a specific focus on environmental and social safeguards, a critical area for international development agencies like USAID. Comparable spending in this niche often involves long-term engagements for policy development, impact assessments, and capacity building.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, The Cadmus Group LLC, is a large business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within the provided data. Future analysis could explore subcontracting opportunities to ensure small businesses can participate in supporting these critical environmental and social safeguarding efforts.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by USAID's contracting officers and program managers, ensuring adherence to the terms and conditions. The time and materials pricing structure necessitates robust monitoring of labor hours and costs. Transparency is facilitated through the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), which records contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

environmental-consulting, technical-assistance, usaid, definitive-contract, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, international-development, safeguarding, knowledge-management, training, large-business, massachusetts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Agency for International Development awarded $19.5 million to THE CADMUS GROUP LLC. THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDING AWARD IS TO PROVIDE OUS AND MISSIONS WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, TRAINING SUPPORT AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TO PERFORM THE AGENCY'S THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANDATE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE CADMUS GROUP LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Agency for International Development (Agency for International Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-08-23. End: 2025-03-12.

What is The Cadmus Group LLC's track record with USAID and similar federal agencies for environmental consulting services?

The Cadmus Group LLC has a history of performing work for federal agencies, including USAID. While specific details on past environmental consulting contracts with USAID are not provided in this data snippet, their award for this significant contract suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and experience. A deeper dive into their contract history within the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) would reveal the extent and nature of their previous engagements, including performance ratings, past performance on similar projects, and any notable successes or challenges. This would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and expertise in delivering environmental and social safeguarding services.

How does the $19.5 million contract value compare to similar environmental and social safeguarding technical assistance contracts awarded by USAID or other development agencies?

Without specific comparable contract data, a precise benchmark is challenging. However, $19.5 million for a definitive contract spanning over 1.5 years for comprehensive technical assistance, training, and knowledge management in environmental and social safeguarding is substantial. This suggests a significant scope of work, potentially covering multiple missions or complex projects. Typically, such contracts are awarded through competitive processes to ensure value. Benchmarking would ideally involve comparing this award to other large-scale technical assistance contracts for environmental compliance, risk assessment, and sustainable development support within the international development sector, considering factors like duration, deliverables, and geographic reach.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential cost overruns due to the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, which requires diligent oversight to manage labor hours and rates effectively. Another risk is ensuring the consistent quality and relevance of technical assistance and training across diverse global contexts and USAID missions. Furthermore, measuring the long-term impact and effectiveness of the delivered services presents an inherent challenge. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract management, clear performance metrics, regular reporting requirements, site visits, and feedback mechanisms from USAID missions to ensure the contractor meets objectives and maintains quality standards.

How will the effectiveness of the environmental and social safeguarding mandate be measured under this contract?

The effectiveness of the environmental and social safeguarding mandate under this contract will likely be measured through a combination of performance metrics and deliverables outlined in the contract statement of work. These could include the number of missions receiving technical assistance, the quality and utilization of training programs, the development and dissemination of knowledge management products, and adherence to environmental and social safeguard policies. USAID program managers will be responsible for monitoring progress against these metrics and assessing the contractor's performance. Periodic reviews and final evaluations will likely be conducted to determine the overall impact and success of the services provided in strengthening the agency's safeguarding capabilities.

What is the historical spending trend for environmental and social safeguarding support services by USAID?

Analyzing historical spending trends for environmental and social safeguarding support services by USAID would provide valuable context for this $19.5 million award. Without access to USAID's historical procurement data specifically filtered for these services, it's difficult to establish a precise trend. However, given the increasing global focus on environmental sustainability and social responsibility in development projects, it is plausible that spending in this area has been stable or increasing. Understanding past investments can help assess whether this contract represents a significant increase, a continuation of existing efforts, or a reallocation of resources within USAID's broader mandate.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesEnvironmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 410 TOTTEN POND ROAD, WALTHAM, MA, 02451

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $45,996,641

Exercised Options: $45,996,641

Current Obligation: $19,465,496

Actual Outlays: $9,762,231

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-08-23

Current End Date: 2025-03-12

Potential End Date: 2025-03-12 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-05-27

More Contracts from THE Cadmus Group LLC

View all THE Cadmus Group LLC federal contracts →

Other Agency for International Development Contracts

View all Agency for International Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending