DHS awards $139,570 engineering services contract to AECOM for locker room upgrades

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $139,570 ($139.6K)

Contractor: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2025-11-25

End Date: 2026-07-30

Contract Duration: 247 days

Daily Burn Rate: $565/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: AE TRAVERSE CITY AST LOCKER ROOM

Place of Performance

Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44199

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $139,569.5 to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: AE TRAVERSE CITY AST LOCKER ROOM Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized engineering services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of 247 days is standard for this type of project. 4. Fixed-price contract shifts risk to the contractor. 5. Project location in Ohio may have implications for local workforce. 6. Focus on facility upgrades indicates a need for improved infrastructure.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $139,570 for engineering services related to locker room upgrades seems within a reasonable range for specialized technical support. Benchmarking against similar facility renovation projects for government entities would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor has adequately estimated costs and risks, which can be beneficial for the government in controlling expenditures. However, without detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to private sector projects of similar scope, a definitive assessment of optimal pricing is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The number of bidders is not specified, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which is expected to lead to more favorable pricing and better quality services for the government. The open competition suggests that the U.S. Coast Guard sought the best value proposition from the market.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the potential for cost savings and improved service quality due to a competitive bidding process. Full and open competition increases the likelihood that the government secures a fair price for the engineering services.

Public Impact

Personnel at the U.S. Coast Guard facility in Ohio will benefit from improved locker room facilities. Engineering services will be delivered to support infrastructure modernization at a federal site. The geographic impact is localized to the specific U.S. Coast Guard installation in Ohio. The contract may indirectly support local engineering and construction jobs in Ohio.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if initial requirements are not clearly defined.
Dependence on contractor's expertise for accurate engineering assessments.
Risk of delays if unforeseen site conditions are encountered.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
Clear project objective for facility improvement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS code 541330), which encompasses firms providing engineering consulting and design services. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services for infrastructure projects, facility maintenance, and specialized technical support across various agencies. The market for engineering services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of undertaking government contracts. This specific award represents a small portion of overall federal spending on engineering and architectural services, which often runs into billions annually.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. is a large business. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific contract appears limited unless subcontracting opportunities arise organically.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the U.S. Coast Guard contracting office and the assigned contracting officer's representative (COR). The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by fixing the total cost. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Facilities Engineering
Military Construction
Government Infrastructure Modernization
Department of Homeland Security Facilities Management

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope is not clearly defined.
Risk of delays due to unforeseen site conditions.
Dependence on contractor's expertise for accurate engineering solutions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $139,569.5 to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.. AE TRAVERSE CITY AST LOCKER ROOM

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $139,569.5.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-11-25. End: 2026-07-30.

What is AECOM Technical Services, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of Homeland Security or U.S. Coast Guard?

AECOM Technical Services, Inc. has a substantial history of securing federal contracts across various agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and its components like the U.S. Coast Guard. Their portfolio often includes engineering, construction management, environmental services, and facility support. Analyzing their past performance on similar-sized projects, especially those involving facility upgrades or specialized engineering for maritime or security-related infrastructure, would provide insight into their reliability and capability. A review of past performance evaluations and any documented issues or successes on previous DHS/USCG contracts would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment of their track record.

How does the $139,570 contract value compare to similar engineering services contracts for facility upgrades awarded by the U.S. Coast Guard or other federal agencies?

The contract value of $139,570 for engineering services related to locker room upgrades is relatively modest in the context of large federal procurement. To benchmark its value, one would compare it to contracts for similar scope and complexity, such as architectural design, MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing) engineering, or project management for minor facility renovations. Data from similar contracts awarded by the U.S. Coast Guard or other agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA) or Department of Defense for comparable facility improvements would be essential. If this price is significantly higher or lower than comparable contracts, it could indicate issues with pricing, scope definition, or the competitiveness of the procurement.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Key risks for this contract include potential scope creep if the initial requirements for locker room upgrades are not precisely defined, leading to cost overruns or delays. Another risk is the contractor's ability to accurately assess existing conditions and unforeseen site issues that could impact the engineering design and subsequent construction. Delays in obtaining necessary permits or approvals could also pose a risk. Mitigation strategies likely involve a clearly defined scope of work, robust project management by the COR, regular progress reviews, and contingency planning within the contract for unforeseen circumstances. The firm fixed-price nature also incentivizes the contractor to manage risks effectively.

How effective is the firm fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money for this specific project?

The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in ensuring value for money when the scope of work is well-defined and the risks are understood. For this locker room upgrade project, an FFP contract provides cost certainty to the government, as the total price is fixed regardless of the contractor's actual costs. This incentivizes the contractor to perform efficiently and manage their own costs effectively to maximize profit. The value for money is realized if the competitive bidding process resulted in a fair price for the defined scope and quality. However, if the scope is poorly defined, the contractor may build in significant contingencies, or change orders could increase the total cost.

What is the historical spending pattern for engineering services by the U.S. Coast Guard, and how does this contract fit within that pattern?

Historical spending on engineering services by the U.S. Coast Guard typically supports a wide range of activities, from major infrastructure projects (e.g., air stations, bases, vessels) to smaller facility maintenance and upgrades. This $139,570 contract for locker room improvements represents a minor expenditure within the broader category of facilities engineering. Analyzing historical data would reveal the frequency and average value of such smaller-scale facility upgrade contracts. This specific award appears to be a routine, albeit necessary, investment in maintaining and improving essential personnel facilities, fitting within the Coast Guard's ongoing operational and infrastructure support needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 70Z08325RTRAV28679463

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 300 S GRAND AVE STE 1100, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90071

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $139,570

Exercised Options: $139,570

Current Obligation: $139,570

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70Z05018DAECOMT06

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline