Coast Guard awards $751K contract for demolition of multiple aids-to-navigation structures

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $751,470 ($751.5K)

Contractor: Joint Forces Construction, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2025-08-26

End Date: 2026-07-03

Contract Duration: 311 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DEMO MULTIPLE ATON STRUCTURES AT ANT CRISFIELD - DEMOLISH MULTIPLE ATON STRUCTURES- PN 8404695

Place of Performance

Location: CRISFIELD, SOMERSET County, MARYLAND, 21817

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $751,470.12 to JOINT FORCES CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C. for work described as: DEMO MULTIPLE ATON STRUCTURES AT ANT CRISFIELD - DEMOLISH MULTIPLE ATON STRUCTURES- PN 8404695 Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Joint Forces Construction, L.L.C. for demolition services. 2. The contract is for a firm-fixed-price delivery order. 3. Project duration is 311 days, with an expected completion date of July 3, 2026. 4. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 5. The project is located in Maryland. 6. This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction industry.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $751,470.12 for the demolition of multiple aids-to-navigation structures appears reasonable given the scope of work. While specific benchmarks for similar demolition projects are not readily available, the firm-fixed-price nature of the contract helps to control costs. The contractor, Joint Forces Construction, L.L.C., will be responsible for managing all expenses associated with the demolition, providing a clear cost expectation for the U.S. Coast Guard.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple interested parties were allowed to submit bids. The solicitation process likely involved advertising the requirement and evaluating proposals based on predefined criteria. The presence of 7 bidders (no=7) suggests a healthy level of competition for this type of service, which generally leads to more competitive pricing and better value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through a competitive bidding process. A larger pool of bidders typically results in more favorable pricing for the government.

Public Impact

The U.S. Coast Guard will benefit from the removal of outdated or damaged aids-to-navigation structures. This project contributes to the safety and efficiency of maritime navigation. The services delivered include the safe and environmentally sound demolition of structures. The project's geographic impact is localized to Maryland. The contract may have implications for the local construction workforce in Maryland.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for unforeseen environmental hazards during demolition requiring additional mitigation costs.
Contractor's past performance on similar demolition projects needs thorough review to ensure successful execution.
Coordination with maritime authorities to minimize disruption to ongoing navigation during demolition activities.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process and potential for competitive pricing.
Clear project duration and completion date allow for effective planning and resource allocation by the Coast Guard.

Sector Analysis

The demolition of aids-to-navigation structures falls within the broader construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. This contract represents a niche service within the larger construction market. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar demolition projects are difficult to ascertain without more specific project details, but the overall federal spending on construction and infrastructure maintenance is substantial, with agencies like the Coast Guard regularly undertaking such projects to maintain operational readiness and safety.

Small Business Impact

While this contract was awarded under full and open competition and there is no indication of a small business set-aside (sb=false), the prime contractor, Joint Forces Construction, L.L.C., may engage small businesses for subcontracting opportunities. The extent of small business participation will depend on the prime contractor's subcontracting plan and the availability of qualified small business subcontractors for specialized demolition or related services.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will be managed by the U.S. Coast Guard, likely through a contracting officer's representative (COR) who will monitor performance, ensure compliance with contract terms, and approve payments. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for the contractor to deliver the specified services within the agreed-upon budget. Transparency is facilitated through the federal procurement data system where contract awards are publicly reported.

Related Government Programs

Coast Guard Infrastructure Maintenance
Maritime Navigation Aids
Federal Demolition Contracts
Commercial Building Construction

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.
Environmental compliance during demolition activities.
Ensuring minimal disruption to active maritime traffic.
Contractor's ability to meet quality and safety standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $751,470.12 to JOINT FORCES CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C.. DEMO MULTIPLE ATON STRUCTURES AT ANT CRISFIELD - DEMOLISH MULTIPLE ATON STRUCTURES- PN 8404695

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JOINT FORCES CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $751,470.12.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-26. End: 2026-07-03.

What is the specific nature of the 'aids-to-navigation structures' to be demolished, and what are the primary reasons for their removal?

The 'aids-to-navigation structures' likely refer to physical markers such as buoys, beacons, or small towers that guide mariners. Their removal is typically due to obsolescence, damage, being replaced by newer technology, or no longer serving a critical navigational purpose. The specific reasons for demolition in this case would be detailed in the contract's statement of work, which is not provided here. However, the U.S. Coast Guard is responsible for maintaining these aids, and decommissioning outdated or non-functional ones is a standard part of their asset management to ensure navigational safety and reduce maintenance burdens.

Can Joint Forces Construction, L.L.C.'s past performance on similar government contracts be assessed to gauge their capability for this demolition project?

Assessing Joint Forces Construction, L.L.C.'s past performance is crucial for understanding their capability. While the provided data indicates the awardee, it does not include details on their performance history. Typically, government agencies review past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) during the source selection process. A review of publicly available contract databases or agency-specific performance records would be necessary to determine if they have successfully completed similar demolition or construction projects for the government, meeting schedule, cost, and quality requirements. Positive past performance would increase confidence in their ability to execute this contract successfully.

How does the $751,470.12 contract value compare to the typical costs for similar demolition projects of maritime infrastructure?

Directly comparing the $751,470.12 contract value to similar demolition projects is challenging without specific details on the size, complexity, materials, and environmental considerations of the structures being removed. Demolition costs can vary significantly based on factors like accessibility, hazardous material abatement (e.g., asbestos, lead paint), and disposal requirements. However, for a project involving multiple structures over a 311-day period, this value appears within a reasonable range for specialized maritime construction services. A more precise benchmark would require access to detailed project scopes and cost breakdowns of comparable federal or private sector demolition contracts.

What are the potential risks associated with this demolition contract, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?

Potential risks include unforeseen site conditions (e.g., unstable foundations, submerged debris), environmental hazards (e.g., hazardous materials within the structures), disruption to ongoing maritime traffic, and contractor performance issues (delays, quality defects). Mitigation strategies likely involve thorough site investigations prior to demolition, adherence to strict environmental protocols, detailed work sequencing plans to minimize navigational impact, and robust contract oversight by the U.S. Coast Guard. The firm-fixed-price contract also shifts some financial risk to the contractor, incentivizing them to manage costs and risks effectively.

What is the historical spending pattern for the U.S. Coast Guard on aids-to-navigation maintenance and demolition?

The U.S. Coast Guard historically spends significant funds on maintaining and modernizing its aids-to-navigation (AtoN) system. This includes the upkeep of physical structures, the transition to electronic AtoN, and the decommissioning of obsolete assets. While specific historical spending figures for demolition alone are not readily available in this dataset, the Coast Guard's overall budget for acquisitions, construction, and improvements often includes allocations for such infrastructure projects. Annual reports and budget justifications from the Department of Homeland Security and the Coast Guard would provide more detailed insights into their long-term investment strategies and spending trends in this area.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 70Z08325RCLEV0089

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 328 OLD YORK HAMPTON HWY, YORKTOWN, VA, 23692

Business Categories: Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $751,470

Exercised Options: $751,470

Current Obligation: $751,470

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70Z08318DPCR07400

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline