DHS awards $19.4M contract for security services in Maryland, highlighting need for consistent guard presence
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,424,026 ($19.4M)
Contractor: CDA Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Start Date: 2025-10-01
End Date: 2026-07-31
Contract Duration: 303 days
Daily Burn Rate: $64.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ARMED PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Place of Performance
Location: ANNAPOLIS, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 21401
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Homeland Security obligated $19.4 million to CDA INC for work described as: ARMED PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF MARYLAND Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in state-wide security infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive market for security services. 3. Contract duration of 30 months indicates a need for sustained security operations. 4. Fixed-price contract type offers cost certainty for the agency. 5. Focus on Maryland suggests a geographically concentrated security requirement. 6. The award to CDA INC warrants a review of their past performance and capacity.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $19.4 million over approximately 30 months for security services in Maryland appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar contracts for armed protective security officers across the state would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Without specific per-unit cost data or comparison to market rates for similar services in Maryland, a definitive assessment of pricing efficiency is challenging. However, the firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides cost predictability.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition suggests a robust process was followed to solicit proposals from various security service providers.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to bid, driving down costs and improving the quality of services received.
Public Impact
Federal facilities and personnel within Maryland will benefit from enhanced security. The contract ensures the provision of armed protective security officer services. Geographic impact is statewide across Maryland. Workforce implications include job creation for security officers in Maryland.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for contractor over-reliance on a single large contract.
- Need to ensure consistent quality of service across all deployed officers.
- Risk of price escalation in future contract renewals if competition diminishes.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market.
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Clear service delivery area (statewide Maryland) simplifies operational oversight.
Sector Analysis
The security services sector is a significant component of government contracting, encompassing a wide range of protective and monitoring functions. This contract falls within the Security Guards and Patrol Services industry (NAICS 561612), which is characterized by numerous providers ranging from small local firms to large national corporations. Government spending in this sector is substantial, driven by the need to protect federal assets and personnel. This award to CDA INC is a typical example of how agencies procure essential security functions.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely limited unless CDA INC voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be necessary to fully assess the impact on small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Procurement Operations, with specific contract officers and CORs (Contracting Officer's Representatives) responsible for monitoring performance and ensuring compliance. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Protective Service Contracts
- Department of Homeland Security Security Services
- Statewide Security Guard Contracts
- Armed Security Personnel Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for service quality variability
- Dependence on contractor's personnel retention
- Need for continuous performance monitoring
Tags
security-services, armed-guards, dhs, department-of-homeland-security, maryland, statewide, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, security-guards-and-patrol-services, naics-561612
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Homeland Security awarded $19.4 million to CDA INC. ARMED PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CDA INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Office of Procurement Operations).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-07-31.
What is CDA INC's track record with federal contracts, particularly in security services?
A review of CDA INC's federal contract history would be necessary to assess their performance. This would involve examining past awards, performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS reports), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. Understanding their experience with similar-sized contracts and security requirements in Maryland or comparable regions would provide insight into their capability to fulfill this current award. A positive track record with consistent performance and adherence to contract terms would be a strong indicator of reliability for this new DHS contract.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar security services in Maryland?
To benchmark the value, the awarded price of $19.4 million over approximately 30 months needs to be compared against prevailing market rates for armed protective security officers in Maryland. This involves researching average hourly wages, overhead costs, and profit margins for security firms operating in the state. Factors such as the specific security clearances required, the level of training mandated, and the 24/7 operational tempo will influence these rates. If the contract's per-hour or per-officer cost is significantly lower than market averages, it suggests good value. Conversely, a higher cost might indicate potential overpayment or unique service requirements justifying the premium.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks include potential service disruptions due to personnel turnover, failure to meet performance standards, or security breaches. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contractor performance monitoring by DHS, clear performance metrics within the contract, and contingency plans for service continuity. The firm fixed-price nature mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. Ensuring CDA INC has adequate bonding and insurance, along with a strong quality control plan, further addresses financial and operational risks. Regular communication and site visits by CORs are crucial for early risk identification.
How effective is the current security service provision in Maryland, and what improvements does this contract aim to achieve?
The effectiveness of current security services would be assessed based on historical incident reports, response times, and overall security posture within DHS facilities in Maryland. This new contract aims to ensure a consistent and high level of security by potentially consolidating services, updating operational requirements, or addressing identified gaps in previous service provisions. Improvements could include enhanced surveillance capabilities, more rigorous officer training, or better integration with local law enforcement. The contract's success will be measured by its ability to maintain a secure environment and prevent security incidents.
What are the historical spending patterns for security services by DHS in Maryland?
Analyzing historical spending by DHS for security services in Maryland would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and types of services procured. This includes examining previous contracts awarded for similar security functions, noting any significant increases or decreases in spending over time. Understanding these patterns helps contextualize the current $19.4 million award, indicating whether it represents a typical investment, an expansion of services, or a cost-saving measure. It also informs future budget planning and identifies potential areas for efficiency improvements.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Guards and Patrol Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 185 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR STE 220, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 21401
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,424,026
Exercised Options: $19,424,026
Current Obligation: $19,424,026
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 70RFP324DE3000002
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-10-01
Current End Date: 2026-07-31
Potential End Date: 2026-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-25
More Contracts from CDA Inc
- Federal Contract — $33.8M (Department of Defense)
- Task Order Under Multiple Award Contract 70rfp224dec000009 for Protective Security Officer (PSO) Services Throughout Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands — $33.3M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Protective Security Officer Services Throughout the State of Maryland — $21.5M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Central California Basic Armed Protective Security Officer (PSO) Services — $21.2M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Protective Security Officer Services Throughout the State of Maryland — $18.7M (Department of Homeland Security)
Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- THE United States Coast Guard HAS a Requirement to Procure UP to Twenty-Six (26) Fast Response Cutters (frcs) on a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basis With an Economic Price Adjustment (EPA). Phase II of the FRC Program Will Complete the Fleet for a Total of 58 Cutters — $2.1B (Bollinger Shipyards Lockport, L.L.C.)
- Design and Construct NEW Vertical Barrier and Power Distribution, Lighting, Cameras, Equipment Shelters and Linear Ground Detection System (lgds) in Hildago County, NM — $1.8B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Production&delivery of National Security Cutter (NSC) 6 — $1.7B (Huntington Ingalls Incorporated)
- YUM-2 Vertical Border and Waterborne Barrier Construction — $1.7B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Construct Vertical Border Barrier — $1.6B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)