DHS awards $9.4M for risk methodology and programmatic support to Global Miracle Solutions LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,441,472 ($9.4M)

Contractor: Global Miracle Solutions LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2022-09-30

End Date: 2026-07-14

Contract Duration: 1,383 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: RISK METHODOLOGY AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE County, UTAH, 84111

State: Utah Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $9.4 million to GLOBAL MIRACLE SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: RISK METHODOLOGY AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value of $9.4M for risk methodology and programmatic support. 2. Services provided by Global Miracle Solutions LLC. 3. Contract awarded by the Department of Homeland Security (FEMA). 4. Contract duration extends to July 2026. 5. Procurement method: Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources. 6. Contract type: Time and Materials. 7. Place of performance: Utah.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $9.4 million for risk methodology and programmatic support appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized engineering services. However, without specific benchmarks for similar risk analysis contracts or detailed service breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The Time and Materials pricing structure can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored, suggesting a need for diligent oversight to ensure efficient use of funds.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting the pool of bidders. The number of bidders is not specified, but the limited nature of the competition suggests that price discovery might not have been as robust as in a truly unrestricted full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may have resulted in a higher price for taxpayers than if a broader range of qualified vendors had been able to participate. It is crucial to understand the rationale behind the exclusion of sources to ensure fairness and maximize taxpayer value.

Public Impact

The Department of Homeland Security benefits from enhanced risk assessment capabilities. Programmatic support services will aid in the effective execution of DHS initiatives. The contract supports critical national security functions. Workforce implications are likely within the specialized engineering and risk analysis fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost escalation due to Time and Materials pricing.
Limited competition may have impacted optimal price discovery.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes outcome assessment difficult.

Positive Signals

Awarded to a single entity, potentially indicating specialized expertise.
Long contract duration suggests a sustained need for these services.
Performance location in Utah may support regional economic activity.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), which is a significant part of the federal contracting landscape, particularly for agencies like DHS focused on national security and emergency management. The market for risk analysis and programmatic support is competitive, with many firms offering specialized expertise. Benchmarking this contract's value against similar large-scale engineering support contracts would provide further insight into its cost-effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus, as the 'ss' (small business set-aside) and 'sb' (small business) flags are false. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary contractor, Global Miracle Solutions LLC, is likely a larger entity, and opportunities for small businesses may be limited unless they are direct subcontractors to the prime.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within FEMA. Accountability measures would be tied to the delivery orders issued against the contract and the performance standards outlined. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, but detailed programmatic oversight information is often internal to the agency. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Homeland Security Grants Program
FEMA Disaster Relief Fund
National Preparedness System
Risk Management and Analysis Services

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
Limited competition may affect price discovery.
Scope creep risk in T&M contracts.
Need for robust oversight to ensure value for money.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $9.4 million to GLOBAL MIRACLE SOLUTIONS LLC. RISK METHODOLOGY AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GLOBAL MIRACLE SOLUTIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Emergency Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-09-30. End: 2026-07-14.

What is the specific nature of the 'risk methodology and programmatic support' being provided?

The contract specifies 'RISK METHODOLOGY AND PROGRAMMATIC SUPPORT' under the description. While the exact deliverables are not detailed in the provided data, this typically involves developing, refining, or implementing frameworks for assessing risks across various operational domains within the Department of Homeland Security. Programmatic support likely entails assisting with the planning, execution, monitoring, and evaluation of specific DHS programs, ensuring they align with strategic objectives and regulatory requirements. This could include data analysis, policy development, stakeholder engagement, and reporting related to risk management initiatives.

How does the $9.4 million contract value compare to similar risk analysis and programmatic support contracts awarded by DHS or FEMA?

Benchmarking the $9.4 million contract value requires access to a broader dataset of comparable contracts. However, for specialized engineering and programmatic support services, especially those involving complex risk methodologies for a large agency like DHS, this value is not inherently excessive. Contracts for similar services can range from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of dollars, depending on the scope, duration, and complexity. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, coupled with a duration extending to July 2026, suggests a potentially significant amount of labor hours will be expended. A detailed comparison would necessitate analyzing contracts with similar NAICS codes (e.g., 541330 - Engineering Services) and service descriptions.

What are the potential risks associated with a Time and Materials contract for this type of service?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, like this one, carry inherent risks, primarily the potential for cost overruns if not managed diligently. Unlike fixed-price contracts, the government pays for the actual labor hours and material costs incurred by the contractor. This structure can incentivize contractors to extend project timelines or increase resource utilization to maximize billing. For risk methodology and programmatic support, risks include scope creep, inefficient task execution, and difficulty in precisely forecasting final costs. Robust oversight, clear task definitions, and regular performance reviews are critical to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives good value.

What does 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' imply for the bidding process and potential cost savings?

The 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' (F&O CAES) designation suggests that the solicitation was intended to be open to all responsible sources, but specific sources were excluded from consideration. The reasons for exclusion must be justified and documented, often due to specific technical requirements, prior performance issues, or national security concerns. While it aims for broad competition, the exclusion of certain entities can limit the competitive landscape. This might lead to fewer bids than a truly unrestricted competition, potentially impacting price discovery and potentially resulting in a higher cost for taxpayers compared to a scenario with maximum feasible competition.

What is the track record of Global Miracle Solutions LLC in performing similar federal contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of Global Miracle Solutions LLC in performing similar federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data snippet. A comprehensive assessment would require accessing federal procurement databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) to review their past performance ratings, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on previous awards. Understanding their experience with risk methodology, programmatic support, and contracts of similar size and complexity for agencies like DHS is crucial for evaluating their capability and reliability on this current award.

How does the contract's performance location in Utah impact the overall cost and service delivery?

The specified place of performance is Utah. While the exact impact on cost and service delivery isn't detailed, a concentrated performance location can sometimes streamline project management and communication. It may also influence labor costs, as rates can vary significantly by geographic region. If the work requires on-site presence or coordination with facilities in Utah, this location is logical. However, if the work is primarily remote, the specific location might be less critical unless it relates to specific regional expertise or data handling requirements. Travel costs, if any, would also be a factor.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 270 EAST 100 S, SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 84111

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,958,269

Exercised Options: $9,441,472

Current Obligation: $9,441,472

Actual Outlays: $4,841,682

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAD20D1047

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline