Transportation contract for riverbank rehabilitation awarded to Yorkshire Industries LLC for $586,415

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $586,415 ($586.4K)

Contractor: Yorkshire Industries LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2025-11-10

End Date: 2026-04-17

Contract Duration: 158 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: OK FW SQH T501(1) REHAB RIVERBANK & SANDTOWN WOODS TR RIVERBANK REHABILITATION

Place of Performance

Location: CLAREMORE, ROGERS County, OKLAHOMA, 74017

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $586,415 to YORKSHIRE INDUSTRIES LLC for work described as: OK FW SQH T501(1) REHAB RIVERBANK & SANDTOWN WOODS TR RIVERBANK REHABILITATION Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the scope of riverbank rehabilitation. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Contract duration of 158 days is standard for this type of project. 5. Project is located in Oklahoma, impacting local infrastructure. 6. No small business set-aside, indicating potential for larger firms to dominate.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $586,415 for riverbank rehabilitation seems aligned with typical project costs for similar infrastructure work. Benchmarking against other Federal Highway Administration projects of comparable scope and complexity would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure is advantageous as it caps the government's liability and incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded for defined reasons. With 7 bidders, the level of competition appears healthy, which typically leads to more competitive pricing and better value for the government. The number of bidders suggests that the opportunity was visible and accessible to qualified firms.

Taxpayer Impact: A robust competition among seven bidders generally translates to taxpayer savings by driving down the final contract price. This ensures that the government is not overpaying for the services rendered.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the residents and businesses in the Sandtown Woods and Riverbank areas of Oklahoma, who will experience improved infrastructure resilience. The project will deliver essential riverbank rehabilitation services, crucial for preventing erosion and potential flooding. Geographic impact is localized to the specific riverbank sections within Oklahoma. Workforce implications include potential job creation for construction laborers, engineers, and project managers in the local Oklahoma area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited small business participation due to the nature of the contract and lack of specific set-aside.
The 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants further investigation to ensure it did not unduly limit competition.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Healthy competition with 7 bidders suggests a competitive market.
Project addresses critical infrastructure needs for flood control and stability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction sector, a significant segment of the construction industry focused on public infrastructure. Spending in this sector is often driven by federal and state initiatives aimed at maintaining and improving transportation networks and related environmental protections. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other FHWA contracts for similar rehabilitation projects across the nation.

Small Business Impact

The contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside, nor are there explicit indications of subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity, and the extent of small business involvement will depend on Yorkshire Industries LLC's subcontracting decisions. Without specific subcontracting plans, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular contract may be limited.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Department of Transportation. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified work within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed project progress reports may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Highway Administration Construction Projects
Infrastructure Rehabilitation Programs
River and Coastal Flood Mitigation

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
Lack of explicit small business subcontracting goals.
Need for detailed performance review of contractor on similar projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $586,415 to YORKSHIRE INDUSTRIES LLC. OK FW SQH T501(1) REHAB RIVERBANK & SANDTOWN WOODS TR RIVERBANK REHABILITATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is YORKSHIRE INDUSTRIES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Highway Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $586,415.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-11-10. End: 2026-04-17.

What is the track record of Yorkshire Industries LLC in completing similar riverbank rehabilitation projects for the federal government?

A review of federal contract databases indicates that Yorkshire Industries LLC has been awarded contracts for construction and infrastructure work. However, specific details on their past performance on riverbank rehabilitation projects of similar scale and complexity would require a deeper dive into contract performance reports and past performance evaluations. Examining their history with the Federal Highway Administration or other agencies involved in environmental or civil engineering projects would provide further insight into their capabilities and reliability for this specific type of work. Assessing their on-time and on-budget completion rates for previous projects is crucial for understanding their potential performance on this contract.

How does the awarded price of $586,415 compare to market rates for similar riverbank rehabilitation projects?

Benchmarking the $586,415 contract value against market rates requires detailed analysis of project scope, location, and specific rehabilitation techniques. Generally, firm fixed-price contracts awarded under full and open competition with multiple bidders tend to reflect competitive market pricing. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to analyze recent contracts for similar projects in Oklahoma or surrounding states, considering factors like linear feet of bank stabilized, cubic yards of material moved, and environmental mitigation requirements. Without access to detailed cost breakdowns or a broader market survey of comparable projects, it's challenging to definitively state if this price is above or below market, but the competitive award process suggests it is within a reasonable range.

What are the primary risks associated with this riverbank rehabilitation project, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks for this project include unforeseen subsurface conditions (e.g., unstable soil, groundwater issues), adverse weather impacting construction schedules, and potential environmental compliance challenges. The firm fixed-price contract mitigates financial risk for the government by capping costs. Mitigation strategies likely employed by the contractor include thorough site investigations prior to and during construction, flexible scheduling to account for weather, and adherence to strict environmental permits and protocols. The contract's defined duration and clear scope of work also help manage project execution risks.

What is the expected effectiveness of this rehabilitation in preventing future erosion and flooding?

The effectiveness of the rehabilitation hinges on the specific engineering solutions employed, which are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, riverbank rehabilitation projects utilize methods such as riprap installation, bioengineering techniques (vegetation), or structural reinforcement to stabilize banks and dissipate water energy. If designed and executed properly, these methods can significantly reduce erosion rates and improve the river's capacity to handle flood flows, thereby mitigating flood risk for adjacent areas. The long-term effectiveness will also depend on ongoing monitoring and potential maintenance.

How does historical spending on riverbank rehabilitation by the Department of Transportation compare to this award?

Analyzing historical spending requires access to comprehensive federal procurement data. The Department of Transportation, through agencies like the Federal Highway Administration, regularly funds infrastructure projects, including those related to waterway management and flood control adjacent to transportation corridors. Without specific data on the volume and value of past riverbank rehabilitation contracts awarded by the DOT, a direct comparison is difficult. However, this $586,415 award appears to be a moderately sized project within the broader context of federal infrastructure investments.

What are the implications of the 'exclusion of sources' clause in the contract type?

The contract type 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' implies that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain potential offerors were intentionally excluded. This exclusion must be justified by the agency, often due to reasons like national security, specific technical requirements that only a limited number of firms can meet, or prior work on the project that makes them uniquely qualified. While 7 bidders participated, the exclusion of other potential sources could theoretically limit the breadth of competition and potentially impact price discovery. A thorough review of the justification for excluding sources would be necessary to fully assess its implications.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction › Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: 6982AF25B000021

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 420 LEXINGTON AVE, NEW YORK, NY, 10170

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $586,415

Exercised Options: $586,415

Current Obligation: $586,415

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline