DOT's FAA awards $926K engineering support contract to ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $925,944 ($925.9K)

Contractor: Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2025-03-26

End Date: 2026-03-18

Contract Duration: 357 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NAS ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR AJW-154

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73169

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $925,943.6 to ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: NAS ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR AJW-154 Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized engineering support services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. No immediate risk indicators are apparent from the provided data. 4. Contract duration is approximately one year, aligning with typical project timelines. 5. This contract falls within the engineering services sector, supporting aviation infrastructure. 6. The award is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $925,943.60 for engineering support services seems within a reasonable range for specialized technical assistance. Benchmarking against similar contracts for aviation engineering support would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that the solicitation was broadly advertised and multiple bids were likely considered. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows for a wide range of qualified contractors to participate. The specific details of the bidding process, such as the number of proposals received, are not provided but the chosen method is designed to foster robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process like this typically leads to better pricing for taxpayers by encouraging multiple firms to offer their best terms and services to win the contract.

Public Impact

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) benefits from specialized engineering expertise. Services will support critical aviation infrastructure and safety initiatives. The contract's geographic impact is likely national, given the FAA's scope. Workforce implications include employment for engineers and technical specialists within the contractor's organization.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract operates within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), a critical component of the broader aerospace and defense industry. The market for specialized aviation engineering support is substantial, driven by the continuous need for infrastructure upgrades, regulatory compliance, and technological advancements within the Federal Aviation Administration. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other FAA contracts for similar engineering and technical support services, as well as broader government spending on engineering consulting.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through set-asides is not applicable. However, the prime contractor, ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, contributing to the broader small business ecosystem. Further analysis would be needed to determine subcontracting plans and actual utilization.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Federal Aviation Administration. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement data systems where contract awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-transportation, federal-aviation-administration, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, aviation, professional-services, oklahoma, medium-value

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $925,943.6 to ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC. NAS ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR AJW-154

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $925,943.6.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-03-26. End: 2026-03-18.

What is the track record of ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC with the FAA and DOT?

ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC has a significant history of contracting with various U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Transportation and its sub-agencies like the FAA. A review of federal procurement databases would reveal the extent and nature of their past performance. Generally, companies with extensive government contracts have established processes for compliance and delivery. Specific performance metrics, past performance evaluations, and any disputes or contract terminations related to their work with the FAA would provide a more detailed understanding of their reliability and capability for this specific engineering support role.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar engineering support contracts awarded by the FAA?

The contract value of approximately $926,000 for a duration of roughly one year (357 days) for engineering support services needs to be benchmarked against similar FAA contracts. Factors such as the specific technical expertise required, the scope of work, and the complexity of the aviation systems involved would influence pricing. Without access to a detailed comparison of contract scopes and market rates for specialized aviation engineering, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents superior or inferior value. However, the use of full and open competition suggests an effort to achieve market-based pricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this engineering support contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract are generally related to performance and schedule. If ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC fails to deliver the required engineering expertise or meets critical deadlines, it could impact FAA operations or safety initiatives. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, cost overruns are primarily the contractor's risk, but scope creep or unforeseen technical challenges could lead to requests for contract modifications. Another potential risk is the availability of specialized engineering talent within the contractor's workforce to meet the FAA's demands throughout the contract period.

How effective is the FAA in leveraging engineering support contracts to maintain and improve aviation safety?

The FAA's use of engineering support contracts is a critical mechanism for maintaining and improving aviation safety. These contracts provide access to specialized expertise that may not be available in-house, covering areas like system design, safety analysis, regulatory compliance, and technology integration. The effectiveness hinges on clear statement of work, robust oversight, and selecting contractors with proven capabilities. By outsourcing specific engineering tasks, the FAA can focus its internal resources on core regulatory and oversight functions, thereby enhancing its overall capacity to ensure a safe air transportation system.

What has been the historical spending trend for engineering services by the FAA over the past five years?

Analyzing the historical spending trend for engineering services by the FAA over the past five years would provide context for the current $926K award. Generally, spending in this category fluctuates based on infrastructure investment cycles, new technology adoption, and regulatory changes. A significant increase or decrease in spending could indicate shifts in FAA priorities or budget allocations. Understanding this trend helps in assessing whether this particular contract represents a typical investment or a deviation, and whether overall spending is aligned with the agency's mission and operational needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation

Address: 7000 MUIRKIRK MEADOWS DR STE 100, BELTSVILLE, MD, 20705

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,308,042

Exercised Options: $925,944

Current Obligation: $925,944

Actual Outlays: $750,781

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 6973GH18D00008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-03-26

Current End Date: 2026-03-18

Potential End Date: 2026-03-18 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-08

More Contracts from Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC

View all Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Transportation Contracts

View all Department of Transportation contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending