NASA awards $104M contract to ASRC Federal for Program Analysis and Control
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $104,034,312 ($104.0M)
Contractor: Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2019-12-17
End Date: 2021-06-15
Contract Duration: 546 days
Daily Burn Rate: $190.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: PROGRAM ANALYSIS AND CONTROL
Place of Performance
Location: GREENBELT, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20771
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $104.0 million to ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: PROGRAM ANALYSIS AND CONTROL Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $104M awarded to ASRC Federal. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. 3. Contract duration of 546 days. 4. The contract falls under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330).
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The award amount is substantial, but without specific performance metrics or benchmarks, assessing its value is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The competition was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', indicating a specific reason for excluding certain potential bidders. This method may limit price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs compared to unrestricted full and open competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for this significant contract. The specific value for money and efficiency of this procurement method will impact the overall taxpayer return.
Public Impact
Supports critical program analysis and control functions for NASA. Impacts the operational efficiency and success of NASA's programs. Potential for job creation within ASRC Federal and its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can incentivize higher costs.
- Limited competition method may reduce price competitiveness.
- Contract duration is relatively short, potentially leading to follow-on contract needs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded to an established federal contractor.
- Supports essential NASA operations.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is crucial for government agencies like NASA. Spending in this sector is often driven by complex project requirements and specialized expertise.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically be managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers to ensure performance and cost control. The effectiveness of this oversight is not detailed in the provided data.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF contract type.
- Limited competition may result in a less competitive price.
- Lack of transparency on specific program supported.
- No indication of small business participation.
Tags
engineering-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, md, delivery-order, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $104.0 million to ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC. PROGRAM ANALYSIS AND CONTROL
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $104.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2019-12-17. End: 2021-06-15.
What specific program analysis and control functions does this contract support, and how do they align with NASA's strategic goals?
This contract likely supports critical functions such as project planning, risk management, budget tracking, and performance monitoring for various NASA initiatives. Its alignment with strategic goals would depend on the specific programs it serves, ensuring efficient resource allocation and successful mission execution.
What were the specific reasons for excluding sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method, and did this impact the final price?
Exclusion of sources typically occurs when only a limited number of contractors possess the unique capabilities or proprietary information required for the specific service. While intended to ensure specialized needs are met, this can sometimes reduce competitive pressure, potentially influencing the final negotiated price.
How will the effectiveness and value of this $104M contract be measured and ensured throughout its duration?
Effectiveness and value are typically measured through performance metrics outlined in the contract, such as timely delivery of reports, accuracy of analysis, and adherence to budget. NASA's program managers and contracting officers are responsible for monitoring these metrics and ensuring the contractor meets all obligations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 80GSFC20D0001
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Address: 7000 MUIRKIRK MEADOWS DR STE 100, BELTSVILLE, MD, 20705
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $104,304,312
Exercised Options: $104,304,312
Current Obligation: $104,034,312
Actual Outlays: $104,034,312
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 157
Total Subaward Amount: $73,625,667
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 80GSFC20D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2019-12-17
Current End Date: 2021-06-15
Potential End Date: 2021-06-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-02-28
More Contracts from Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC
- Aerospace Systems Technical Reasearch and Operations Support Services (astros) — $216.1M (Department of Defense)
- ,Ct::igf Engineering Services Mets II Bridge Contract.the Purpose of the Multidisciplinary Engineering and Technical Services II Bridge (mets II Bridge) Contract IS to Acquire Engineering and Related Services to the Mechanical Systems Division (MSD), the Software Engineering Division (SED), the Instrument Systems and Technology Division (istd), the Electrical Engineering Division (EED), and the Mission Engineering and Systems Analysis Division (mesa) and Related Organizations Under Aetd, AS Required, for the Formulation, Design, Development, Non-Flight Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. the Emphases in Engineering Services ARE in the Areas of Systems Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, and Guidance Navigation and Control (GN&C) Services. to This END, the Contractor Provides On/Off-Site Multidisciplinary Engineering Services, Pursuant to Task Assignments Issued by the Contracting Officer — $133.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Satellite and Ground Command and Control — $98.0M (Department of Defense)
- Services to Support the Operation, Maintenance and Logistics of the Peterson-Schriever Garrison Information and Communications Systems — $69.3M (Department of Defense)
- Research Facilities and Engineering Support Services (rf&ess) — $61.7M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →