Transportation awards $2.35M engineering services contract to ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,349,132 ($2.3M)
Contractor: Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation
Start Date: 2025-03-25
End Date: 2026-03-18
Contract Duration: 358 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Transportation
Official Description: FUNDING TO SUPPORT AJW-161
Place of Performance
Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73169
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Transportation obligated $2.3 million to ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: FUNDING TO SUPPORT AJW-161 Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized engineering services. 2. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources suggests a deliberate procurement strategy. 3. Contract duration of 358 days is standard for this type of service. 4. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks. 5. The award is for engineering services, a critical component of infrastructure projects. 6. The contractor has a track record with federal agencies.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $2.35 million for engineering services over approximately one year appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized technical support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for engineering services within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or Department of Transportation (DOT) would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the scope and associated costs, which is a positive indicator for cost control.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on predefined criteria, possibly related to specialized capabilities or prior performance. The number of bidders is not specified, but this procurement method suggests a balance between ensuring broad competition and targeting specific expertise.
Taxpayer Impact: This procurement method aims to ensure fair pricing by allowing multiple qualified vendors to bid, while also ensuring that the selected vendor possesses the necessary specialized skills for the task, ultimately benefiting taxpayers by securing expert services.
Public Impact
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will benefit from enhanced engineering support for its initiatives. Services delivered will likely include technical analysis, design review, and project support for aviation infrastructure. The geographic impact is likely national, given the FAA's purview, though specific project locations are not detailed. The contract supports the federal workforce by engaging a private sector contractor for specialized engineering tasks.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for limited competition if exclusion criteria were overly restrictive.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical engineering services.
Positive Signals
- ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC is a known entity in the federal contracting space.
- Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
- The contract is for essential engineering services supporting aviation infrastructure.
Sector Analysis
Engineering services represent a significant segment of federal contracting, particularly within sectors like transportation and defense, where specialized technical expertise is paramount. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering a range of capabilities. This contract, valued at $2.35 million, falls within the mid-range for specialized engineering support, likely contributing to the broader efforts of the FAA in maintaining and improving aviation infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar engineering support contracts within the DOT often range from hundreds of thousands to several million dollars, depending on the scope and duration.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract. As it was awarded under full and open competition, there is no explicit requirement for subcontracting to small businesses unless it is part of ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC's standard business practices or a voluntary commitment. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether smaller, specialized engineering firms were able to participate in the bidding process or if they are likely to be subcontracted by the prime awardee.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases where contract awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Aviation Administration Operations Support
- Department of Transportation Engineering Services
- Air Traffic Control System Modernization
- Aviation Infrastructure Development
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to exclusion of sources.
- Contract performance risk if specialized expertise is not adequately applied.
Tags
transportation, federal-aviation-administration, engineering-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, department-of-transportation, asrc-federal-system-solutions-llc, oklahoma, delivery-order
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Transportation awarded $2.3 million to ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC. FUNDING TO SUPPORT AJW-161
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-03-25. End: 2026-03-18.
What is ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC's track record with the Federal Aviation Administration and Department of Transportation?
ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC has a history of performing contracts with various federal agencies, including the Department of Transportation and its sub-agencies like the FAA. Their past performance typically involves providing a range of IT, engineering, and professional services. A review of federal procurement data would reveal specific contract vehicles, values, and performance ratings. Generally, companies like ASRC Federal are established players in the federal contracting landscape, suggesting a baseline level of experience and capability. However, a detailed analysis of their specific performance on similar FAA or DOT contracts, including any past issues or commendations, would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their suitability for this particular award.
How does the $2.35 million contract value compare to similar engineering services contracts awarded by the FAA?
The $2.35 million contract value for engineering services awarded to ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC is within a moderate range for specialized technical support within the Federal Aviation Administration. Similar contracts for engineering support, system design, or technical consulting services awarded by the FAA can range from several hundred thousand dollars for smaller, focused tasks to tens of millions for large-scale, multi-year projects. This specific award, with a duration of approximately one year, suggests a scope that is substantial but not exceptionally large. Benchmarking against contracts with similar scopes, durations, and service types (e.g., AJW-161 program support) would confirm if the pricing is competitive and reflects fair market value for the services rendered.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?
The primary risks associated with this contract include potential performance issues if the contractor fails to deliver the required engineering services to the FAA's satisfaction, and schedule delays that could impact downstream projects. Cost risks are largely mitigated by the firm-fixed-price contract type, which shifts the financial burden of cost overruns to the contractor. Performance risks are managed through contract oversight by the FAA, defined deliverables, and performance metrics. Schedule risks are addressed through the contract's defined period of performance and potential incentives or penalties, though these are not explicitly detailed here. The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method also aims to mitigate risk by selecting a contractor with demonstrated capabilities.
What is the expected program effectiveness or impact of these engineering services on the FAA's mission?
The expected program effectiveness of these engineering services is to enhance the Federal Aviation Administration's capability to manage, develop, and maintain its complex systems and infrastructure. Specifically, the funding is designated to 'SUPPORT AJW-161,' which likely pertains to a specific program or initiative within the FAA, possibly related to air traffic management, aviation safety, or technological modernization. By securing specialized engineering expertise, the FAA can ensure that its projects are technically sound, compliant with regulations, and efficiently executed. This ultimately contributes to the safety, efficiency, and modernization of the national airspace system, benefiting airlines, passengers, and the broader aviation industry.
How has federal spending on engineering services within the Department of Transportation trended over the past five years?
Federal spending on engineering services within the Department of Transportation (DOT) has generally seen a consistent demand, driven by the need to maintain, upgrade, and expand the nation's transportation infrastructure. While specific figures fluctuate annually based on budget allocations and project priorities, the overall trend indicates sustained investment. Factors influencing this spending include infrastructure bills, technological advancements in transportation (e.g., NextGen in aviation, smart highways), and the ongoing maintenance requirements of existing assets. The DOT, encompassing agencies like the FAA, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration, consistently procures engineering services across various disciplines, making it a significant sector for engineering firms.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Address: 7000 MUIRKIRK MEADOWS DR STE 100, BELTSVILLE, MD, 20705
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $3,353,009
Exercised Options: $2,349,132
Current Obligation: $2,349,132
Actual Outlays: $1,537,592
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 6973GH18D00008
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-03-25
Current End Date: 2026-03-18
Potential End Date: 2026-03-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-02-11
More Contracts from Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC
- Aerospace Systems Technical Reasearch and Operations Support Services (astros) — $216.1M (Department of Defense)
- ,Ct::igf Engineering Services Mets II Bridge Contract.the Purpose of the Multidisciplinary Engineering and Technical Services II Bridge (mets II Bridge) Contract IS to Acquire Engineering and Related Services to the Mechanical Systems Division (MSD), the Software Engineering Division (SED), the Instrument Systems and Technology Division (istd), the Electrical Engineering Division (EED), and the Mission Engineering and Systems Analysis Division (mesa) and Related Organizations Under Aetd, AS Required, for the Formulation, Design, Development, Non-Flight Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. the Emphases in Engineering Services ARE in the Areas of Systems Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, and Guidance Navigation and Control (GN&C) Services. to This END, the Contractor Provides On/Off-Site Multidisciplinary Engineering Services, Pursuant to Task Assignments Issued by the Contracting Officer — $133.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Program Analysis and Control — $104.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Satellite and Ground Command and Control — $98.0M (Department of Defense)
- Services to Support the Operation, Maintenance and Logistics of the Peterson-Schriever Garrison Information and Communications Systems — $69.3M (Department of Defense)
View all Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Transportation Contracts
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $3.8B (Lockheed Martin Services, LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Delivery Order Award IS to ADD Funding for FTI Telecommunications Services — $1.9B (Harris Corporation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Leidos, Inc.)
- Center for Advanced Aviation Development (caasd) Ffrdc Mitre — $1.7B (THE Mitre Corporation)
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $1.5B (Harris Corporation)