DOT awards $4.97M engineering support contract to ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC for AJW-151
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,972,821 ($5.0M)
Contractor: Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation
Start Date: 2025-03-25
End Date: 2026-03-18
Contract Duration: 358 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NAS ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR AJW-151
Place of Performance
Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73169
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Transportation obligated $5.0 million to ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: NAS ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR AJW-151 Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized engineering support services. 2. Competition was conducted after excluding sources, raising questions about full and open market engagement. 3. Performance period of 358 days suggests a focused scope of work. 4. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks. 5. The contract is positioned within the broader engineering services sector for the FAA. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller firms.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $4.97 million for a period of 358 days for engineering support services seems within a reasonable range for specialized technical assistance. Benchmarking against similar contracts for engineering services within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, given the fixed-price nature, the government has a defined cost ceiling, which is a positive indicator for cost control.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This indicates that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded from the outset. The specific reasons for exclusion are not detailed here, but this approach typically suggests a need for specialized capabilities or prior performance that narrowed the field. The number of bidders is not provided, making it difficult to fully assess the breadth of competition and its impact on price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The exclusion of sources may limit the potential for the most competitive pricing, as a smaller pool of bidders might be less incentivized to offer their lowest possible rates compared to a truly open competition.
Public Impact
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will benefit from specialized engineering support for the AJW-151 program. This contract will ensure the continued provision of critical engineering services necessary for aviation infrastructure and operations. The services are likely to be performed in Oklahoma, based on the provided location data. The contract supports a firm specializing in federal system solutions, contributing to the federal IT and engineering workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition due to source exclusion could lead to higher costs.
- Lack of transparency regarding the reasons for excluding sources.
- Potential for vendor lock-in if specialized knowledge is concentrated with the awarded contractor.
Positive Signals
- Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC is an established federal contractor.
- The contract duration is defined, allowing for clear performance expectations.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS code 541330), a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector supports various government agencies by providing specialized design, consulting, and technical expertise. Spending in this area is often driven by infrastructure projects, defense needs, and technological advancements. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other engineering support contracts awarded by the FAA and similar agencies for projects of similar scale and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that this was not a small business set-aside, and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract may be limited, either as prime contractors or subcontractors, unless ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC voluntarily includes them in their subcontracting plan.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Federal Aviation Administration's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded within the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified engineering services. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, although specific details regarding the 'exclusion of sources' rationale may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Aviation Administration Engineering Services
- Department of Transportation Professional Services Contracts
- AJW-151 Program Support
- Engineering Consulting Services
Risk Flags
- Limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Potential lack of transparency regarding exclusion rationale.
- Dependency on contractor's specialized knowledge.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-transportation, federal-aviation-administration, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, limited-competition, professional-services, oklahoma, ajw-151, asrc-federal-system-solutions-llc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Transportation awarded $5.0 million to ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC. NAS ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR AJW-151
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $5.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-03-25. End: 2026-03-18.
What is the track record of ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC with the Federal Aviation Administration?
ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC has a history of performing contracts with various federal agencies, including the FAA. To assess their specific track record with the FAA, a detailed review of their past performance on similar engineering support contracts would be necessary. This would involve examining contract histories for on-time delivery, quality of work, adherence to budget, and overall customer satisfaction ratings. A positive performance history with the FAA on comparable projects would increase confidence in their ability to successfully execute this current contract. Conversely, any past issues or disputes could represent a potential risk factor.
How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar engineering support services?
Without specific details on the scope of work and the exact services provided under this $4.97 million contract, a precise market rate comparison is challenging. However, the contract's fixed-price nature suggests that the government has negotiated a ceiling cost. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable engineering support contracts awarded by the FAA or other agencies for similar technical requirements and contract durations. Factors such as the level of expertise required, the complexity of the systems supported (AJW-151), and the geographic location of service delivery would influence market rates. A preliminary assessment suggests the value is within a plausible range for specialized federal engineering support.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract award?
The primary risks associated with this contract include potential limitations in price competition due to the 'exclusion of sources' clause, which may have restricted the number of qualified bidders. If the excluded sources possessed unique capabilities or offered more competitive pricing, the government might not have achieved the best possible value. Another risk could be the contractor's ability to deliver the highly specialized engineering support required for the AJW-151 program within the specified timeframe and budget, although the fixed-price contract mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. Finally, the dependency on a single contractor for specific engineering functions could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
How effective is the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' approach for ensuring value?
The effectiveness of 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' in ensuring value is context-dependent. This approach is typically used when specific technical requirements, security needs, or prior performance necessitate a narrowed field of potential offerors. While it allows for competition among a selected group, it inherently limits the breadth of market engagement compared to a truly open solicitation. If the exclusions are well-justified and the remaining pool of bidders is still robust and competitive, it can lead to good value. However, if the exclusions are arbitrary or result in a lack of meaningful competition, it can lead to suboptimal pricing and reduced innovation, thus diminishing the value for taxpayers.
What is the historical spending trend for engineering support services by the FAA?
Historical spending trends for engineering support services by the FAA are generally substantial, reflecting the agency's continuous need for technical expertise in areas such as air traffic control systems, aircraft safety, infrastructure development, and regulatory compliance. The FAA consistently procures a wide range of engineering services, from design and analysis to testing and integration, often through competitive solicitations. Analyzing past FAA budgets and contract awards for engineering services would reveal patterns of increased or decreased spending, shifts in technology focus (e.g., NextGen initiatives), and the types of engineering disciplines most in demand. This specific contract for AJW-151 represents a portion of that ongoing investment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Address: 7000 MUIRKIRK MEADOWS DR STE 100, BELTSVILLE, MD, 20705
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $9,413,153
Exercised Options: $4,972,821
Current Obligation: $4,972,821
Actual Outlays: $2,765,521
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 6973GH18D00008
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-03-25
Current End Date: 2026-03-18
Potential End Date: 2026-03-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-12
More Contracts from Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC
- Aerospace Systems Technical Reasearch and Operations Support Services (astros) — $216.1M (Department of Defense)
- ,Ct::igf Engineering Services Mets II Bridge Contract.the Purpose of the Multidisciplinary Engineering and Technical Services II Bridge (mets II Bridge) Contract IS to Acquire Engineering and Related Services to the Mechanical Systems Division (MSD), the Software Engineering Division (SED), the Instrument Systems and Technology Division (istd), the Electrical Engineering Division (EED), and the Mission Engineering and Systems Analysis Division (mesa) and Related Organizations Under Aetd, AS Required, for the Formulation, Design, Development, Non-Flight Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. the Emphases in Engineering Services ARE in the Areas of Systems Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, and Guidance Navigation and Control (GN&C) Services. to This END, the Contractor Provides On/Off-Site Multidisciplinary Engineering Services, Pursuant to Task Assignments Issued by the Contracting Officer — $133.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Program Analysis and Control — $104.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Satellite and Ground Command and Control — $98.0M (Department of Defense)
- Services to Support the Operation, Maintenance and Logistics of the Peterson-Schriever Garrison Information and Communications Systems — $69.3M (Department of Defense)
View all Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Transportation Contracts
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $3.8B (Lockheed Martin Services, LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Delivery Order Award IS to ADD Funding for FTI Telecommunications Services — $1.9B (Harris Corporation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Leidos, Inc.)
- Center for Advanced Aviation Development (caasd) Ffrdc Mitre — $1.7B (THE Mitre Corporation)
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $1.5B (Harris Corporation)