DOT awards $3.35M engineering support contract to ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,350,461 ($3.4M)
Contractor: Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation
Start Date: 2025-03-26
End Date: 2026-03-18
Contract Duration: 357 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES CONTRACT
Place of Performance
Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73169
State: Oklahoma Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Transportation obligated $3.4 million to ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract value represents a moderate investment in specialized engineering and technical support. 2. Competition was conducted under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' suggesting a potentially limited but justified bidding process. 3. The contract is a delivery order, indicating it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle. 4. Performance is expected to occur in Oklahoma, with a duration of 357 days. 5. The firm fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized for this specific award.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $3.35 million for engineering and technical support services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized engineering services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests an expectation of well-defined requirements and cost control by the contractor.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This procurement method implies that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources were excluded, possibly due to specific requirements or prior contract vehicles. The number of bidders is not specified, but this approach can sometimes lead to less competitive pricing compared to unrestricted full and open competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a structured competition that aims to balance openness with specific project needs, potentially securing specialized expertise.
Public Impact
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will benefit from enhanced engineering and technical support services. Services delivered will likely contribute to the ongoing operations and maintenance of critical aviation infrastructure. The geographic impact is centered in Oklahoma, where the contractor will perform the work. The contract supports specialized engineering roles, potentially impacting the technical workforce within the aerospace and defense sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
- Reliance on a single delivery order may indicate a narrow scope within a broader IDIQ.
- Firm fixed-price contracts can pose risks if unforeseen technical challenges arise.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Contract duration of 357 days allows for focused project execution.
- Award to an established entity like ASRC Federal suggests a degree of contractor reliability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), a critical component of the aerospace and defense industry. The market for engineering and technical support services is substantial, driven by government and private sector demand for specialized expertise in areas like aerospace, defense, and infrastructure. Spending in this sector is often characterized by long-term relationships and complex project requirements.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The absence of a set-aside suggests that the primary focus was on securing the most suitable large business contractor for the specialized services required.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will be managed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) within the Department of Transportation. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon budget. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics are typically internal.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Operations and Maintenance Contracts
- Department of Transportation Engineering Services
- Aerospace Engineering Support Contracts
- Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Vehicles
Risk Flags
- Limited competition due to exclusion of sources.
- Potential for scope creep in fixed-price engineering contracts.
- Contract duration is relatively short, suggesting a specific task or phase.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-transportation, federal-aviation-administration, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition-after-exclusion-of-sources, oklahoma, it-support, technical-support, aerospace, medium-value-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Transportation awarded $3.4 million to ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC. ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ASRC FEDERAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-03-26. End: 2026-03-18.
What is the track record of ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC with the FAA and DOT?
ASRC Federal System Solutions LLC has a history of performing various IT and engineering support services for federal agencies, including the FAA and other components of the Department of Transportation. Their past performance often involves complex system integration, software development, and technical support. Analyzing their specific contract history with the FAA would reveal their success rates, any past performance issues, and their experience with similar types of engineering and technical support requirements. This information is crucial for assessing their capability to successfully execute the current $3.35 million contract.
How does the $3.35 million contract value compare to similar engineering support contracts awarded by the FAA?
The $3.35 million contract value for engineering and technical support services is a moderate amount for a single delivery order. To benchmark its value, one would compare it to other FAA contracts for similar services, considering factors like contract duration, scope of work, and the specific technical expertise required. For instance, larger, multi-year IDIQ contracts for comprehensive engineering support might run into hundreds of millions of dollars, while smaller, specialized task orders could be in the low millions. This $3.35 million award suggests a focused scope of work, possibly addressing a specific technical challenge or a defined phase of a larger project within the FAA's operational needs.
What are the primary risks associated with this firm fixed-price contract?
The primary risk with a firm fixed-price (FFP) contract, especially for engineering services, is the potential for scope creep or unforeseen technical complexities that were not adequately defined during the bidding process. If the contractor encounters significant challenges that require more resources or time than initially estimated, they may incur losses unless contract modifications are approved. Conversely, the government risks paying a premium if the contractor's initial cost estimates were overly conservative. Effective project management and clear statement of work are crucial to mitigate these risks for both parties.
What does the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' procurement method imply for program effectiveness?
The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method implies that the FAA sought competitive bids but had specific reasons to exclude certain potential offerors. This could be due to the need for specific security clearances, unique technical capabilities, or because the contract is a follow-on to a previous effort where only certain contractors possess the necessary knowledge. While it aims for competition, the exclusion of sources might limit the pool of bidders, potentially impacting the range of innovative solutions or the most competitive pricing. However, if the exclusions were justified by essential requirements, it could lead to a more effective outcome by ensuring the selection of a highly qualified contractor.
What is the historical spending trend for engineering and technical support services by the FAA?
Historical spending by the FAA on engineering and technical support services has generally been substantial, reflecting the agency's continuous need for expertise in areas such as air traffic control systems, aircraft safety, infrastructure development, and regulatory compliance. Annual spending can fluctuate based on major modernization programs, research initiatives, and operational demands. Analyzing past FAA budgets and contract awards for similar services would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the primary contractors utilized. This context helps in understanding the significance of the current $3.35 million award within the broader spending landscape.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Address: 7000 MUIRKIRK MEADOWS DR STE 100, BELTSVILLE, MD, 20705
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,225,413
Exercised Options: $3,350,461
Current Obligation: $3,350,461
Actual Outlays: $2,426,422
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 6973GH18D00008
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-03-26
Current End Date: 2026-03-18
Potential End Date: 2026-03-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-27
More Contracts from Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC
- Aerospace Systems Technical Reasearch and Operations Support Services (astros) — $216.1M (Department of Defense)
- ,Ct::igf Engineering Services Mets II Bridge Contract.the Purpose of the Multidisciplinary Engineering and Technical Services II Bridge (mets II Bridge) Contract IS to Acquire Engineering and Related Services to the Mechanical Systems Division (MSD), the Software Engineering Division (SED), the Instrument Systems and Technology Division (istd), the Electrical Engineering Division (EED), and the Mission Engineering and Systems Analysis Division (mesa) and Related Organizations Under Aetd, AS Required, for the Formulation, Design, Development, Non-Flight Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. the Emphases in Engineering Services ARE in the Areas of Systems Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, and Guidance Navigation and Control (GN&C) Services. to This END, the Contractor Provides On/Off-Site Multidisciplinary Engineering Services, Pursuant to Task Assignments Issued by the Contracting Officer — $133.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Program Analysis and Control — $104.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Satellite and Ground Command and Control — $98.0M (Department of Defense)
- Services to Support the Operation, Maintenance and Logistics of the Peterson-Schriever Garrison Information and Communications Systems — $69.3M (Department of Defense)
View all Asrc Federal System Solutions LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Transportation Contracts
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $3.8B (Lockheed Martin Services, LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Delivery Order Award IS to ADD Funding for FTI Telecommunications Services — $1.9B (Harris Corporation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Leidos, Inc.)
- Center for Advanced Aviation Development (caasd) Ffrdc Mitre — $1.7B (THE Mitre Corporation)
- Dafis UDO Reconstruct W/O Advance — $1.5B (Harris Corporation)