DOT awards $1.57M to JSTOOGOOD LLC for management consulting, with limited competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,574,228 ($1.6M)

Contractor: Jstoogood LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2023-08-16

End Date: 2026-08-16

Contract Duration: 1,096 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CONTRACT AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES SEED FUNDING

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTIC CITY, ATLANTIC County, NEW JERSEY, 08405

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $1.6 million to JSTOOGOOD LLC for work described as: CONTRACT AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES SEED FUNDING Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating defined scope and cost. 2. Limited competition suggests potential for higher pricing than a fully competed contract. 3. Contract duration of 1096 days provides a stable period for service delivery. 4. The contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. 5. Awarded via a BPA Call, suggesting it's part of a pre-established agreement. 6. Geographic location of service is New Jersey.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $1.57 million over three years for management consulting services appears within a reasonable range for specialized support. However, without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar administrative management consulting contracts would provide better context on pricing efficiency. The firm-fixed-price structure offers cost certainty but requires careful scope management to ensure value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) and was awarded via a BPA Call. The 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation, combined with the 'limited' competition level, suggests that the procurement process may not have involved a broad solicitation. While a BPA Call implies a pre-existing framework agreement, the specific competition for this call is not detailed, raising questions about the extent of market engagement.

Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition can lead to taxpayers potentially paying more than they would in a fully open market scenario, as the number of bidding entities is restricted.

Public Impact

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the primary beneficiary, receiving administrative management and general management consulting services. Services are expected to support the agency's operational and administrative functions. The contract's impact is geographically focused on New Jersey, where the services will be performed. The contract supports a single contractor, JSTOOGOOD LLC, and its workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed competition information raises concerns about optimal price discovery.
Limited transparency on specific performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
The contract's reliance on a BPA Call warrants scrutiny of the underlying agreement's competitiveness.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the agency.
Contract duration offers stability for service planning and execution.
Awarding to a specific contractor suggests alignment with agency needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is crucial for government operations, providing expertise in areas like strategic planning, organizational efficiency, and administrative support. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized consulting. The contract value of $1.57 million is moderate within the broader federal consulting landscape, which sees contracts ranging from small task orders to multi-billion dollar programs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from set-aside requirements. The primary contractor, JSTOOGOOD LLC, is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) within the Department of Transportation. Accountability measures are generally managed through contract performance reviews and adherence to the firm-fixed-price terms. Transparency is dependent on the agency's public reporting practices for contract awards and performance. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Federal Aviation Administration Contracts
Department of Transportation BPA Calls
Management Support Services

Risk Flags

Limited competition may result in suboptimal pricing.
Lack of detailed performance metrics hinders value assessment.
Contract awarded via BPA Call requires review of underlying agreement.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $1.6 million to JSTOOGOOD LLC. CONTRACT AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES SEED FUNDING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JSTOOGOOD LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-08-16. End: 2026-08-16.

What is the track record of JSTOOGOOD LLC in performing federal contracts, particularly in management consulting?

Information regarding JSTOOGOOD LLC's specific track record with federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their performance history, one would need to consult federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS-NG. These databases would reveal past awards, performance evaluations (if available), and any history of contract disputes or terminations. A thorough review would help determine if JSTOOGOOD LLC has a demonstrated history of successful delivery for similar management consulting services, especially within the federal government context. Understanding their past performance is crucial for evaluating the risk associated with this current award and ensuring successful project outcomes.

How does the $1.57 million contract value compare to similar management consulting contracts awarded by the FAA or DOT?

The $1.57 million contract value for administrative management and general management consulting services over approximately three years is a moderate-sized award. To benchmark this effectively, a comparison with similar contracts awarded by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or the broader Department of Transportation (DOT) is necessary. Analysis of historical contract data would reveal the typical range for such services, considering factors like contract duration, scope of work, and contractor experience. If this contract's value is significantly higher or lower than comparable awards, it could indicate potential issues with pricing efficiency or scope definition. Benchmarking helps ensure that taxpayer funds are being used judiciously and that the contract represents good value for the services rendered.

What are the specific risks associated with a 'limited' competition award for management consulting services?

A 'limited' competition award, as indicated for this contract, carries several risks. Primarily, it suggests that the number of potential bidders was restricted, which can lead to reduced price competition. This lack of robust competition may result in the government paying a higher price than if the contract had been fully and openly competed. Furthermore, limited competition can sometimes mean that innovative solutions or a wider range of expertise available in the market are not considered. There's also a risk that the chosen contractor may have less incentive to perform at their best, knowing that alternative options were not thoroughly explored by the agency. Transparency in the justification for limited competition is key to mitigating these risks.

What are the expected outcomes or program effectiveness indicators for this management consulting contract?

The provided data does not specify the expected outcomes or program effectiveness indicators for this management consulting contract. Typically, such contracts would have clearly defined deliverables, performance metrics, and key performance indicators (KPIs) outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW). These could include improvements in operational efficiency, development of strategic plans, enhancement of administrative processes, or successful implementation of new management techniques. Without these details, it is difficult to assess the potential effectiveness of the services provided by JSTOOGOOD LLC. A review of the SOW and any associated performance work statements would be necessary to understand the intended impact and how success will be measured.

What has been the historical spending pattern for administrative management and general management consulting services by the FAA?

To understand the historical spending patterns for administrative management and general management consulting services by the FAA, one would need to analyze multi-year procurement data. This analysis would involve examining the total amount spent annually on contracts within the NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services) by the FAA. It would also be beneficial to track the number of contracts awarded, the average contract value, and the types of competition used (e.g., full and open, sole source). Such a review would reveal trends in spending, identify major contractors, and provide context for the current $1.57 million award, indicating whether this represents an increase, decrease, or typical level of investment in these services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2300 WEST RATHGEBER RD, WICHITA FALLS, TX, 76310

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,065,227

Exercised Options: $1,574,228

Current Obligation: $1,574,228

Actual Outlays: $1,303,634

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 693KA922A00170

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline