EPA awards $32.4M for Superfund Analytical Services, extending contract through January 2027

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,410,123 ($32.4M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2023-03-20

End Date: 2027-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,413 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: QSS CONTRACT: SUPERFUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES BRANCH (ASB) TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22042

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $32.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: QSS CONTRACT: SUPERFUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES BRANCH (ASB) TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in environmental cleanup oversight. 2. Task order awarded under a broad indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 3. Performance period spans nearly four years, indicating a long-term need for these services. 4. Fixed-price contract type suggests cost certainty for the agency. 5. The contractor, General Dynamics Information Technology, has a substantial presence in federal IT and professional services. 6. This award falls within the administrative management and general management consulting services NAICS code.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The total award amount of $32.4 million over approximately 3.75 years suggests a moderate annual spend for analytical services. Benchmarking against similar EPA contracts for Superfund-related analytical support would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure offers predictability, but the ultimate value depends on the efficiency and quality of the services delivered. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a precise value assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is generally expected to yield fair market pricing and encourage innovation. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it drives down costs through market forces and ensures the government receives the best possible value for its investment.

Public Impact

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) benefits through enhanced capacity for Superfund site cleanup and oversight. Services delivered include critical analytical support for assessing environmental contamination and remediation effectiveness. Geographic impact is nationwide, supporting Superfund sites across the United States. Workforce implications may include specialized analytical chemists, project managers, and data analysts within the contractor's organization.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if analytical needs evolve significantly beyond initial projections.
Reliance on a single large contractor for critical analytical functions could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing and vendor selection.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the EPA.
Long performance period indicates a stable, ongoing need for these essential services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically consulting and analytical services. The market for environmental consulting and analytical services is substantial, driven by regulatory requirements and a growing focus on environmental protection. The EPA is a major client in this space, with significant spending allocated to Superfund program support. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large federal contracts for environmental testing and analysis.

Small Business Impact

The contract indicates that small business participation was not a primary set-aside consideration, as the 'ss' (small business set-aside) field is false. While the prime contractor is a large entity, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors, depending on the specific task requirements and the prime's subcontracting plan. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business involvement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is likely managed by the EPA's contracting officers and program managers responsible for the Superfund program. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within budget. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal contract databases, though detailed performance reports may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Program
Environmental Remediation Services
Environmental Consulting Services
Federal Analytical Laboratories

Risk Flags

Long-term contract duration may increase risk if requirements change.
Reliance on a single large contractor for critical services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $32.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. QSS CONTRACT: SUPERFUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES BRANCH (ASB) TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-03-20. End: 2027-01-31.

What is the historical spending trend for Superfund Analytical Services Branch (ASB) task orders awarded to General Dynamics Information Technology?

Analyzing historical spending data for ASB task orders awarded to General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) would provide context for the current $32.4 million award. Without access to specific historical contract data, it's difficult to ascertain if this represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending compared to previous periods. However, the duration of this task order (nearly four years) suggests a sustained commitment to these services. Understanding past spending patterns can help identify trends in the EPA's reliance on GDIT for analytical support and assess the consistency of contract values over time.

How does the per-task order value of this contract compare to other similar Superfund analytical services contracts awarded by the EPA?

To compare the per-task order value, we would need to identify similar contracts for Superfund analytical services awarded by the EPA, ideally within the same timeframe and scope. The current task order's value of $32.4 million over approximately 3.75 years translates to an average annual spend of roughly $8.6 million. If other comparable task orders have significantly higher or lower annual values, it could indicate differences in the scope of work, complexity of analytical needs, or market pricing. A comprehensive benchmark would involve analyzing a portfolio of similar contracts to establish a typical range for such services.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the performance of General Dynamics Information Technology under this contract?

The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided data. However, for analytical services supporting the Superfund program, typical KPIs would likely include metrics related to the accuracy and timeliness of analytical results, adherence to quality assurance protocols, completeness of reporting, and responsiveness to EPA requests. Performance would also be assessed against contract deliverables and milestones. The EPA's contracting officer and technical monitors would be responsible for tracking these KPIs and ensuring GDIT meets the required performance standards throughout the contract period.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the broader environmental consulting and analytical services market?

This $32.4 million task order awarded to General Dynamics Information Technology signifies a substantial commitment by the EPA to environmental analytical services, particularly for the Superfund program. For the broader market, it indicates continued demand for specialized scientific and technical expertise in environmental assessment and remediation. While GDIT is a large prime contractor, this award may create subcontracting opportunities for smaller, specialized analytical laboratories or consulting firms. It also reinforces the importance of firms with established capabilities in environmental data analysis and regulatory compliance within the federal contracting landscape.

Are there any known performance issues or past disputes associated with General Dynamics Information Technology's previous contracts with the EPA or other federal agencies?

Assessing past performance issues or disputes for General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) requires a review of federal contract databases and past performance information repositories. GDIT is a large, established federal contractor with a wide range of services. While specific details of past performance are not provided here, agencies typically consider a contractor's track record during the source selection process. Any significant past performance concerns would likely have been a factor in the 'full and open competition' evaluation. A thorough review would involve checking sources like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 68HERH21R0030

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp

Address: 3150 FAIRVIEW PARK DR STE 100, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $54,141,324

Exercised Options: $54,141,324

Current Obligation: $32,410,123

Actual Outlays: $26,585,774

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 13

Total Subaward Amount: $17,297,774

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HERH23D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline