EPA awards $2.4M for Global Methane Pledge support, with 4 bidders competing
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,436,854 ($2.4M)
Contractor: ABT Global LLC
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2022-10-13
End Date: 2025-10-16
Contract Duration: 1,099 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: GLOBAL METHANE PLEDGE IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT TASKS 1,2,6,7,8
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20460
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $2.4 million to ABT GLOBAL LLC for work described as: GLOBAL METHANE PLEDGE IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT TASKS 1,2,6,7,8 Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the scope of environmental consulting services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. Potential risks include contractor performance and adherence to project timelines. 4. This contract supports a critical international environmental initiative. 5. The services fall within the broader environmental consulting sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $2.4 million for a period of nearly three years seems aligned with typical consulting engagements for complex environmental initiatives. Benchmarking against similar EPA contracts for policy support and implementation tasks suggests this pricing is within a competitive range. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure allows for flexibility but requires diligent oversight to ensure cost efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, with four bidders submitting proposals. This indicates a competitive marketplace for environmental consulting services related to international climate initiatives. The presence of multiple bidders generally supports price discovery and encourages contractors to offer competitive rates and robust technical solutions.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more favorable price and better value for the services rendered compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.
Public Impact
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) benefits directly through enhanced capacity to implement the Global Methane Pledge. Services delivered include technical and programmatic support for the pledge's implementation tasks. The geographic impact is national, supporting U.S. engagement in global climate efforts, with potential international implications. Workforce implications include support for specialized environmental consultants and policy experts.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns under the Time and Materials contract if not closely monitored.
- Ensuring contractor expertise aligns with the evolving needs of the Global Methane Pledge.
- Dependency on contractor performance for critical implementation tasks.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
- Contract duration allows for sustained support of the initiative.
- Contractor has experience in environmental consulting services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the environmental consulting services sector, a segment of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector is characterized by specialized expertise in areas such as policy analysis, regulatory compliance, and program management. The market size for environmental consulting is substantial, driven by increasing regulatory pressures and global initiatives like the Global Methane Pledge.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best technical solution and price from the broader market. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are indirectly benefiting through subcontracting opportunities with the prime contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will be managed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Time and Materials pricing structure necessitates robust oversight to monitor labor hours, costs, and deliverables. Transparency is expected through regular reporting from the contractor and EPA's internal contract management processes. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Global Methane Pledge
- Climate Change Mitigation Programs
- Environmental Policy and Consulting
- International Environmental Agreements
Risk Flags
- Time and Materials contract type requires close monitoring for cost control.
- Contract performance risk associated with complex international initiative support.
Tags
environmental-consulting, environmental-protection-agency, global-methane-pledge, climate-change, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, time-and-materials, district-of-columbia, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, federal-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $2.4 million to ABT GLOBAL LLC. GLOBAL METHANE PLEDGE IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT TASKS 1,2,6,7,8
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ABT GLOBAL LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-10-13. End: 2025-10-16.
What is the track record of ABT GLOBAL LLC in performing similar environmental consulting services for federal agencies?
ABT GLOBAL LLC has a history of providing environmental consulting services. While specific details on past federal contracts are not provided in this data snippet, their ability to win this contract through full and open competition suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and experience. A deeper dive into their contract history with agencies like the EPA, Department of the Interior, or Department of Energy would reveal their performance on similar projects, including client satisfaction, adherence to timelines, and budget management. Understanding their past performance on contracts involving international climate initiatives or methane reduction strategies would be particularly relevant for assessing their suitability for this specific task.
How does the awarded amount compare to similar EPA contracts for policy implementation support?
The awarded amount of approximately $2.4 million for nearly three years of support for the Global Methane Pledge implementation tasks appears to be within a reasonable range when compared to similar EPA contracts. Contracts for environmental consulting services, especially those involving complex policy analysis, stakeholder engagement, and international coordination, often fall within this budget bracket. Factors influencing this comparison include the specific tasks outlined, the level of expertise required, and the duration of the contract. Without direct access to a database of comparable EPA contracts, a precise benchmark is difficult, but the number of bidders (four) suggests the value was perceived competitively by the market.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?
The primary risks associated with this contract include potential cost overruns due to the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, contractor performance issues impacting the timely and effective implementation of Global Methane Pledge tasks, and ensuring the contractor's expertise remains aligned with the evolving needs of the initiative. Mitigation strategies likely involve rigorous EPA oversight of contractor hours and expenses, clearly defined performance metrics and deliverables, regular progress reviews, and potentially incorporating incentive clauses or performance-based payments. The EPA's contracting officers will be responsible for monitoring these aspects throughout the contract's duration.
How effective is the Global Methane Pledge initiative, and how does this contract contribute to its success?
The Global Methane Pledge is a key international initiative aimed at reducing global methane emissions by at least 30 percent below 2020 levels by 2030. Its effectiveness is crucial for meeting climate targets, as methane is a potent greenhouse gas. This contract directly contributes to the Pledge's success by providing essential implementation support to the EPA. This support likely involves technical analysis, policy development, stakeholder coordination, and reporting, all of which are vital for translating the Pledge's goals into actionable steps and measurable emission reductions. The success of this contract is therefore directly linked to the progress of the broader initiative.
What have been historical spending patterns for environmental consulting services at the EPA?
Historical spending patterns for environmental consulting services at the EPA typically show significant investment in areas such as regulatory analysis, compliance support, scientific research, and program implementation. The EPA frequently utilizes contracts for specialized expertise that may not be available in-house. Spending can fluctuate based on legislative priorities, new environmental regulations, and the initiation of major environmental programs or international commitments like the Global Methane Pledge. While specific aggregate spending figures require detailed analysis of historical contract databases, it is evident that environmental consulting is a consistent and substantial expenditure category for the agency.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6130 EXECUTIVE BLVD, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20852
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $6,983,089
Exercised Options: $6,983,089
Current Obligation: $2,436,854
Actual Outlays: $2,436,854
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 5
Total Subaward Amount: $350,095
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 68HERH19D0027
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-10-13
Current End Date: 2025-10-16
Potential End Date: 2025-10-16 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-20
More Contracts from ABT Global LLC
- Vector Control Idiq to — $632.1M (Agency for International Development)
- IRS 2 to 6 the Purpose of This Procurement IS to Award a Three (3) Year Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee Type Task Order Under the IRS Idiq to a Qualified Firm to Support the President S Malaria Initiative (PMI), AS Well AS Usaid Missions and Bureaus in Planning and Implementing Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) Programs. More Specifically, the Purpose of the Project IS to Prevent Malaria Infections and Limit Transmission of Malaria by Reducing Contact Between Humans and the Mosquito Vector in the PMI Focus Countries and Other Countries Where Usaid Supports Malaria Control Efforts — $328.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Prevention of Malaria Through Vector Control — $279.3M (Agency for International Development)
- Other Functions:strengthening the Capacity of Congolese Institutions and Communities to Deliver Quality, Integrated Health Services to Sustainably Improve the Health Status of the Congolese Population. This IS a Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (cpff) Contract of Seven Years Consisting of a Four (4) Base and Three-Year(3) Option — $272.5M (Agency for International Development)
- Achieving Sustainability Through Local Health Systems — $240.2M (Agency for International Development)
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)