SRC Inc. awarded $3.08M for Environmental Response Team technical assistance by EPA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,082,001 ($3.1M)

Contractor: SRC Inc

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2024-12-17

End Date: 2026-12-16

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: TASK ORDER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE TEAM (ERT) RISK TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Place of Performance

Location: SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA County, NEW YORK, 13212

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $3.1 million to SRC INC for work described as: TASK ORDER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE TEAM (ERT) RISK TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Key points: 1. Contract provides critical risk technical assistance for environmental response efforts. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Time and Materials contract type may pose cost control challenges. 4. Contract duration of 729 days allows for sustained support. 5. Service area in New York indicates a focus on regional environmental needs. 6. The contract aligns with EPA's mission to protect human health and the environment.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.08 million for environmental consulting services over two years appears reasonable given the specialized nature of technical assistance for environmental response teams. Benchmarking against similar EPA contracts for risk assessment and technical support would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, while flexible, warrants close monitoring to ensure costs remain within projected levels and do not escalate due to inefficiencies or scope creep. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the amount seems aligned with the scope of specialized support.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The open competition suggests that SRC Inc. was selected based on merit and competitive pricing among multiple interested parties.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down costs through market forces and ensures the government receives the best value by considering a wide range of qualified contractors.

Public Impact

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) benefits from enhanced technical expertise for its Environmental Response Team (ERT). Services delivered include critical risk technical assistance, aiding in the management and mitigation of environmental hazards. The geographic impact is focused on New York, addressing regional environmental concerns. The contract supports specialized technical roles within the environmental consulting sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing structure.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess efficiency.
Limited insight into the number of bidders and the intensity of competition.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Contract duration allows for sustained and comprehensive technical assistance.
Aligns with EPA's core mission of environmental protection.

Sector Analysis

The environmental consulting services sector is a significant market driven by regulatory compliance, remediation efforts, and emergency response needs. This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services category. Spending in this area by agencies like the EPA is crucial for managing environmental risks and ensuring public safety. Comparable contracts often involve technical assessments, site investigations, and emergency preparedness planning, with values varying based on scope and duration.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary focus is on the prime contractor, SRC Inc. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether SRC Inc. voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors for specialized services, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available. The EPA's Office of Inspector General (OIG) may conduct audits or investigations if concerns regarding performance, cost, or compliance arise.

Related Government Programs

EPA Environmental Response Team (ERT) Operations
Hazardous Waste Site Remediation Support
Environmental Risk Assessment Services
Emergency Preparedness and Response Contracts
Environmental Consulting Services

Risk Flags

Potential for cost escalation due to T&M contract type.
Lack of detailed competition metrics (number of bidders).
Need for strong performance monitoring to ensure value.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $3.1 million to SRC INC. TASK ORDER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE TEAM (ERT) RISK TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SRC INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-12-17. End: 2026-12-16.

What is SRC Inc.'s track record with the EPA and similar federal agencies for environmental consulting services?

SRC Inc. has a history of performing work for federal agencies, including the EPA. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those involving environmental response, risk assessment, and technical assistance, is crucial. This includes reviewing past performance evaluations, any documented issues or successes, and the types of services they have previously delivered. A strong track record with relevant agencies and a history of successful project completion would indicate a lower risk and higher likelihood of successful performance on this current task order. Conversely, a history of performance issues or contract disputes could raise concerns about their capability to meet the requirements effectively.

How does the $3.08 million contract value compare to similar EPA environmental consulting contracts?

The $3.08 million value for this two-year task order for environmental response team risk technical assistance needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts awarded by the EPA or other agencies for similar services. Factors such as the scope of work, duration, required expertise, and geographic focus influence contract values. If similar contracts for specialized technical assistance over a similar period typically range from $2 million to $5 million, then this award appears to be within a reasonable market range. However, if comparable services have been procured at significantly lower costs, it might suggest potential overpricing or a less competitive bidding environment for this specific award. A detailed analysis would require access to specific contract data and performance details.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for this type of service?

The primary risk associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for environmental consulting services is the potential for cost overruns. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours at specified rates and for the actual cost of materials. This structure can incentivize longer project durations or less efficient work if not carefully managed, as the contractor's profit is tied to the amount of time and resources expended. For the EPA, this necessitates robust oversight, detailed tracking of labor hours, and clear definitions of work to prevent scope creep and ensure that costs remain reasonable and allocable to the defined task. Effective management and monitoring are critical to mitigate these risks and ensure value for taxpayer money.

How effective is the EPA's Environmental Response Team (ERT) likely to be with this enhanced technical assistance?

The effectiveness of the EPA's Environmental Response Team (ERT) is likely to be enhanced by the specialized risk technical assistance provided under this contract. This support can bolster the ERT's capabilities in assessing environmental hazards, developing mitigation strategies, and responding to incidents more efficiently and effectively. By providing expert insights and technical guidance, SRC Inc. can help the ERT make more informed decisions, potentially leading to better outcomes in environmental protection and public safety. The success of this enhancement hinges on the quality of the technical assistance provided, the seamless integration of SRC Inc.'s expertise with the ERT's operations, and the clear articulation of objectives and expected results within the contract.

What are the historical spending patterns for environmental consulting services at the EPA?

Historical spending patterns for environmental consulting services at the EPA are substantial, reflecting the agency's broad mandate. The EPA consistently procures a wide range of services in this category, including site assessments, remediation planning, regulatory compliance support, and emergency response technical assistance. Annual spending can fluctuate based on legislative appropriations, emerging environmental issues, and specific program needs. Analyzing historical data reveals trends in contract types (e.g., T&M vs. fixed-price), competition levels, and the types of specialized services most frequently sought. This context helps in evaluating whether the current $3.08 million award is consistent with past investment levels for similar support.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7502 ROUND POND RD, SYRACUSE, NY, 13212

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,483,053

Exercised Options: $8,855,793

Current Obligation: $3,082,001

Actual Outlays: $1,147,188

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HERC25D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline