EPA Awards $3.1M Contract for Hazardous Substance Remediation at Yuma Cathode Ray Tube Site

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,100,000 ($3.1M)

Contractor: Environmental Quality Management, Inc

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2025-09-08

End Date: 2026-07-24

Contract Duration: 319 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 9021 - YUMA CRT TO ADDRESS THE RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES INTO THE ENVIRONMENT, SPECIFICALLY DUST CONTAINING LEAD, CADMIUM, ARSENIC, BARIUM, AND CHROMIUM, AT THE YUMA CATHODE RAY TUBE SITE IN YUMA, ARIZONA.

Place of Performance

Location: SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO County, CALIFORNIA, 94105

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $3.1 million to ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC for work described as: 9021 - YUMA CRT TO ADDRESS THE RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES INTO THE ENVIRONMENT, SPECIFICALLY DUST CONTAINING LEAD, CADMIUM, ARSENIC, BARIUM, AND CHROMIUM, AT THE YUMA CATHODE RAY TUBE SITE IN YUMA, ARIZONA. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on lead, cadmium, arsenic, barium, and chromium contamination. 2. Environmental Quality Management, Inc. is the awarded contractor. 3. The contract is for remediation services, indicating a need for specialized cleanup. 4. The sector is environmental services, crucial for public health and safety.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.1 million appears reasonable for a complex environmental remediation project involving multiple hazardous substances. Benchmarking against similar EPA Superfund or hazardous waste site cleanup contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' suggesting an initial limited scope or specific requirement that was later opened. This method aims for competitive pricing but the exclusion of sources might limit the pool.

Taxpayer Impact: The taxpayer impact is the $3.1 million investment in environmental cleanup, which is necessary to mitigate health risks and restore the site.

Public Impact

Protects public health by removing toxic substances from the environment. Addresses potential long-term health issues associated with lead and other heavy metal exposure. Contributes to the environmental restoration of the Yuma area. Ensures compliance with environmental regulations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns in complex remediation projects.
Ensuring contractor's long-term effectiveness and compliance.
Managing public perception and community concerns during cleanup.

Positive Signals

Clear identification of hazardous substances.
Defined remediation goals and timeline.
Awarded to a company with relevant experience (assumed).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the environmental remediation sector, which is critical for addressing legacy industrial contamination. Spending in this area is driven by regulatory requirements and public health concerns, with costs varying significantly based on site complexity and contaminant types.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-asides or participation goals for small businesses in this contract. Larger environmental remediation projects often involve prime contractors who may subcontract portions of the work.

Oversight & Accountability

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Robust oversight will be crucial to ensure the remediation is conducted safely, effectively, and within budget, with regular progress reports and site inspections.

Related Government Programs

Remediation Services
Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
Environmental Protection Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Complexity of hazardous material remediation.
Potential for cost overruns.
Ensuring long-term effectiveness of cleanup.
Public health and environmental impact risks.
Contract duration and potential for delays.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $3.1 million to ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC. 9021 - YUMA CRT TO ADDRESS THE RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES INTO THE ENVIRONMENT, SPECIFICALLY DUST CONTAINING LEAD, CADMIUM, ARSENIC, BARIUM, AND CHROMIUM, AT THE YUMA CATHODE RAY TUBE SITE IN YUMA, ARIZONA.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-08. End: 2026-07-24.

What specific remediation technologies will be employed, and how do they compare in cost-effectiveness for the identified contaminants?

The specific remediation technologies are not detailed in the provided data. Effective technologies for lead, cadmium, arsenic, barium, and chromium might include soil stabilization, encapsulation, excavation and off-site disposal, or in-situ treatment. Cost-effectiveness depends on the concentration and mobility of the contaminants, site accessibility, and regulatory requirements for final cleanup levels. A thorough cost-benefit analysis of different technological approaches would be essential for optimal resource allocation.

What are the potential long-term environmental risks if the remediation is not fully effective or if unforeseen issues arise during the cleanup process?

Incomplete remediation could lead to persistent environmental contamination, posing ongoing risks to groundwater, soil, and local ecosystems. Unforeseen issues, such as discovering deeper contamination plumes or encountering unexpected geological conditions, could necessitate additional funding, extended timelines, and potentially more aggressive cleanup methods. Long-term monitoring would be critical to detect any re-emergence of contaminants or migration into surrounding areas, ensuring the site remains safe.

How will the effectiveness of the remediation be measured and verified to ensure the site meets safety standards post-cleanup?

Effectiveness will be measured through rigorous post-remediation sampling and analysis of soil, air, and potentially groundwater to confirm that contaminant levels are below regulatory limits. Verification typically involves independent third-party assessments and EPA review of the contractor's final remediation report. Long-term monitoring plans may also be implemented to ensure the sustained integrity of the remediation efforts and the absence of contaminant migration.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 CARILLION BLVD, CINCINNATI, OH, 45240

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,100,000

Exercised Options: $3,100,000

Current Obligation: $3,100,000

Actual Outlays: $168,884

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $684,217

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0924D0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline